Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrainF
Open Access

Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined, Dynamic and Static, Contrast-Enhanced 4D MR Venography

S. Meckel, C. Reisinger, J. Bremerich, D. Damm, M. Wolbers, S. Engelter, K. Scheffler and S.G. Wetzel
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2010, 31 (3) 527-535; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1869
S. Meckel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Reisinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Bremerich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Damm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Wolbers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Engelter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Scheffler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.G. Wetzel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Fifty-six-year-old woman with subacute left proximal lateral sinus thrombosis (duration of symptoms, 5 days). The arteriovenous transit of a contrast bolus is depicted on the dynamic series of combo-4D MRV (A–E; coronal MIP reformations of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRV; temporal interval between images, 1.5 seconds). At early venous phase, faint filling of cortical veins and the superior sagittal sinus is noted (B). At subsequent later venous phase, the left proximal transverse sinus does not show increased contrast filling other than very faint peripheral enhancement of its dural wall (long arrow in C). At following later venous phases, no increase in contrast filling of this sinus portion is observed (long arrow in D and E). On axial static image of combo-4D MRV (contrast-enhanced 3D VIBE sequence), a hypointense filling defect within the proximal left transverse sinus is depicted (small arrow in F).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Twenty-five-year-old man with subacute thrombosis (thrombus age, 4 days) of posterior portion of superior sagittal sinus, torcular region, and right lateral sinus. Sagittal source image of static VIBE part of combo-4D MRV reveals large isointense filling defect within posterior portion of superior sagittal sinus extending into torcular area (long white arrow in A). On sagittal whole-brain MIP reconstructed image of 2D TOF MRV, most of this thrombus shows hyperintense signal intensity mimicking flow. The small vertical signal intensity gap (short white arrow in B) was misinterpreted as artifact on a single section derived from in-plane signal intensity loss (coronal acquisition). No flow signal intensity is depicted in thrombosed right lateral sinus.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Seventy-six-year-old man with acute venous thrombosis involving left parietal cortical vein (thrombus age approximately 1 day). GRE image shows typical magnetic susceptibility effect with hypointense signal intensity and blooming in left parasagittal parietal cortical vein (long white arrow in A). Static 3D contrast-enhanced VIBE MR venographic images from combo-4D MRV are centered on region of interest (B and C). No evidence of cortical venous filling defect can be seen on axial image (B) and targeted axial thick-slab MIP reformation (thickness, 20 mm; C) of VIBE sequence in corresponding area. Likewise, this thrombosed cortical vein is not evident on 2D TOF MR venogram, as demonstrated by targeted axial thick-slab (thickness, 20 mm; D) and standard coronal whole-head (E) MIP reformations. On the latter image, additional thrombosis of right lateral sinus is depicted (short white arrows in E).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Fifty-three-year-old man with chronic left lateral sinus thrombosis (thrombus age approximately 7 years). Combo-4D MRV consisting of dynamic 3D contrast-enhanced MR venographic images and static 3D contrast-enhanced VIBE MR venographic images. Upper panel, Coronal MIP reformations of combo-4D MRV demonstrate chronic thrombosis of the left lateral sinus. On early venous phase image of the dynamic MRV series (A), a thin channel of contrast enhancement is depicted within a large gap inside the left transverse/sigmoid sinus (long arrow). An increase in this contrast enhancement is noted at the subsequent later venous phase (time delay of 1.5 seconds between dynamic images) on the corresponding image (long arrow, B). On the static MRV image (C), intense contrast-enhancement mimicking patency of these sinuses is disclosed (long arrow). Note also focal postthrombotic changes inside the right lateral sinus (short arrows) without dynamic contrast enhancement. Middle panel, Targeted axial oblique MIP reformations (parallel to the course of the lateral sinuses) of combo-4D MRV show more clearly the dynamic enhancement patterns of chronic left lateral sinus thrombosis (D–F). Lower panel: On corresponding axial GRE image, no relevant magnetic susceptibility effect is observed in the affected venous sinuses (G; short arrow and arrowheads). On T2W image, chronic thrombus reveals an isointense signal intensity (H; short arrow and arrowheads). Complete loss of normal flow signal intensity in left lateral sinus and jugular bulb, as well as irregular signal intensity void at the right transverse/sigmoid sinus junction are depicted on coronal MIP reformation of 2D-TOF MRV (I).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Forty-three-year-old man who underwent MR and MRV investigation for posterior fossa hemorrhage. Axial thick-slab MIP reformations of 2D TOF (A) and static part of combo-4D MRV (contrast-enhanced 3D VIBE, B) are targeted on lateral sinuses (slab thickness, 20 mm). On TOF MRV image, large flow gap in proximal transverse sinus is demonstrated (long white arrow in A). Combo-4D MRV image shows hypoplastic transverse sinus without evidence of thrombosis (short white arrow in B).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Reader agreement rates for CVT at venous segment level

    Imaging Technique
    T2WGRETOF MRVCombo-4D MRV
    Polychoric correlation test0.830.640.880.95
    Binary test0.890.870.890.94
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Average sensitivity and specificity for 2 readers and 53 sites of CVT in 39 patients assessed on venous segment level and on patient level

    Imaging Technique, % (95% CI)Pair-wise Difference, P Valuea
    T2WGRETOF MRVCombo-4D MRV
    Venous segment levelb
    All segments, all stages
        Sensitivity (n = 53)62 (48–74)49 (34–64)72 (59–81)76 (64–84)2(.002), 5(.006)
        Specificity (n = 181)98 (94–99)98 (94–99)96 (92–97)99 (96–100)3(.02)
    Dural venous sinuses, all stages
        Sensitivity (n = 34)72 (55–84)39 (24–57)82 (66–92)97 (84–100)1(.003), 2(<.001), 3(.03), 4(.03), 5(<.001), 6(.005)
        Specificity (n = 122)99 (95–100)98 (94–99)95 (90–97)99 (95–100)3(.02), 4(.007)
    Cortical veins, all stages
        Sensitivity (n = 19)45 (27–64)66 (46–81)53 (35–69)37 (20–58)2(.01)
        Specificity (n = 59)95 (86–99)97 (87–100)98 (89–100)99 (91–100)
    All segments
        Sensitivity, acute stage (n = 16)56 (25–85)56 (36–74)75 (44–96)63 (44–76)N/A
        Sensitivity, subacute stage (n = 31)63 (48–75)50 (29–71)71 (57–80)84 (67–94)N/A
        Sensitivity, chronic stage (n = 6)75 (36–94)20 (6–61)67 (32–88)67 (30–90)N/A
    Patient level, all stagesc
        Sensitivity (m = 20)75 (56–85)55 (38–71)83 (63–91)90 (69–97)2(<.001), 5(.002)
        Specificity (m = 19)97 (77–100)95 (74–100)79 (58–90)100 (80–100)3(.009), 4(.04)
    • Note:—n refers to the number of venous segments included in the calculation; m refers to the number of patients included in the calculation.

    • a Superscripts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 indicate significant difference between combo-4D MRV and T2W, combo-4D MRV and GRE, combo-4D MRV and TOF MRV, TOF MRV and T2W, TOF MRV and GRE, and between GRE and T2W, respectively.

    • b Binary test on venous segment level, ie, test is positive if score is >3.

    • c Binary test on patient level, ie, test is positive for patient if score >3 for any of the patient's venous segments.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    AUC and comparisons between imaging techniques for 2 readers and 53 sites of cerebral venous thrombosis in 39 patients

    AUC EstimatePair-wise Difference, P Value
    Reader 1Reader 2Average (95% CI)
    All veins
        Combo-4D MRV0.940.900.92 (0.88–0.96)a(.03), b(.03)
        TOF MRV0.920.930.93 (0.88–0.97)c(.005), d(.02)
        GRE0.830.890.86 (0.81–0.91)
        T2W0.850.830.84 (0.78–0.91)
    Dural venous sinuses
        Combo-4D MRV0.981.000.99 (0.97–1.00)a(.005), b(<.001)
        TOF MRV0.950.960.96 (0.92–1.00)c(.01), d(<.001)
        GRE0.810.870.84 (0.79–0.89)
        T2W0.890.910.90 (0.84–0.96)
    Cortical veins
        Combo-4D MRV0.870.730.80 (0.70–0.90)
        TOF MRV0.870.900.89 (0.78–0.99)c(.01), e(.02)
        GRE0.850.910.88 (0.78–0.97)
        T2W0.770.700.74 (0.60–0.87)
    • Note:—Superscripts a, b, c, d, and e indicate significant differences between combo-4D MRV and T2W, combo-4D MRV and GRE, TOF MRV and T2W, TOF MRV and GRE, and between TOF MRV and combo-4D MRV, respectively.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 3
1 Mar 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined, Dynamic and Static, Contrast-Enhanced 4D MR Venography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Meckel, C. Reisinger, J. Bremerich, D. Damm, M. Wolbers, S. Engelter, K. Scheffler, S.G. Wetzel
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined, Dynamic and Static, Contrast-Enhanced 4D MR Venography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2010, 31 (3) 527-535; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1869

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined, Dynamic and Static, Contrast-Enhanced 4D MR Venography
S. Meckel, C. Reisinger, J. Bremerich, D. Damm, M. Wolbers, S. Engelter, K. Scheffler, S.G. Wetzel
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2010, 31 (3) 527-535; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1869
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Whole-brain meso-vein imaging in living humans using fast 7 T MRI
  • Overview of Imaging Modalities in Stroke
  • Early Detection and Quantification of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis by Magnetic Resonance Black-Blood Thrombus Imaging
  • Investigating intracerebral haemorrhage
  • Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire