Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine

BLADE in Sagittal T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine

C. Fellner, C. Menzel, F.A. Fellner, C. Ginthoer, N. Zorger, A. Schreyer, E.M. Jung, S. Feuerbach and T. Finkenzeller
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2010, 31 (4) 674-681; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1894
C. Fellner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Menzel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F.A. Fellner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Ginthoer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Zorger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Schreyer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.M. Jung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Feuerbach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Finkenzeller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    TSE (A) and BLADE (B) in a 69-year-old woman with syringomyelia C6/C7. Superior grading in BLADE compared with TSE regarding reduced flow phenomena (mean grade BLADE, 2.0; TSE, 4.0) and truncation artifacts (BLADE, 2.0; TSE, 3.5), improved contrast vertebral body/disk (BLADE, 1.5; TSE, 2.5), contrast spinal cord/CSF (BLADE, 1.5; TSE, 4.0), and diagnostic reliability for the depiction of the spinal cord (BLADE, 2.0; TSE, 5.0).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    TSE (A) and BLADE (B) in a 73-year-old woman with degenerative disk disease. Improved image sharpness in BLADE (BLADE, 2.0; TSE, 4.0), reduced motion artifacts (BLADE, 2.5; TSE, 4.0), and improved reliability of spinal cord depiction (BLADE, 2.5; TSE, 5.0) compared with TSE.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    TSE (A) and BLADE (B) in a 60-year-old man with myelopathy following cervical osteosynthesis. Similar metal artifacts (mean grade, 4.0) in TSE (A) and BLADE (B).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Number of examinations with nondiagnostic quality regarding all evaluation criteria in TSE and BLADE (nondiagnostic grading by at least 1 reader). *, Highly significant difference between TSE and BLADE (P < .001).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    TSE (A) and BLADE (B) in a 72-year-old man with paresthesia of the left hand. Nondiagnostic image quality (image sharpness, motion artifacts, diagnostic reliability spinal cord: mean score, 5.0) in TSE (A) compared with fair, but still diagnostic quality in BLADE (B) (image sharpness, 4.0; motion artifacts, 4.0; diagnostic reliability of spinal cord, 4.5).

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    TSE (A, C) and BLADE (B, D) in a 19-year-old woman with paresthesia of both hands and feet after a traffic accident: no pathologic findings of the spinal cord or vertebral bodies. No motion artifacts are seen in TSE (adjacent section positions, A, C) (mean grade, 1.0); indentation artifacts (arrows) were detected on some of the BLADE (B, D) images.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    BLADE sequence during 2 types of brief head motion (A, B) in a volunteer without pathologic changes of the spinal cord: nodding (A) during the first half of the data acquisition (ie, during the first concatenation) results in similar indentation artifacts (arrows) as in the patient shown in Fig 6; no relevant artifacts appear by shaking his head (B) during the second half of the data acquisition.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Measurement parameters for sagittal T2-weighted TSE and BLADE

    TSEBLADE
    TR (ms)/TE (ms)3000/1133000/112
    Echo-train length1735
    Bandwidth, Hz/pixel140296
    Section thickness (mm)/section gap (mm)3/0.63/0.6
    FOV, mm × mm250 × 250250 × 250
    Matrix size384 × 384384 × 384
    Phase-encoding directionHead–feetRotating
    Oversampling (phase-encoding direction)85%100%
    No. acquisitions21
    Flow compensationYesNo
    Acquisition time, min:s4:174:20
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Results of the visual evaluation on a scale from 1 (excellent) to 5 (nondiagnostic): means and standard deviations

    Reader 1Reader 2Mean (reader 1, reader 2)
    TSEBLADETSEBLADETSEBLADE
    Image sharpness2.20 ± 1.041.62 ± 0.76***2.45 ± 1.111.50 ± 0.73***2.32 ± 1.021.56 ± 0.68***
    Artifacts
    Motion2.23 ± 1.241.55 ± 0.91***2.30 ± 1.181.55 ± 0.87***2.27 ± 1.171.55 ± 0.83***
    Truncation2.77 ± 0.992.42 ± 0.72*2.53 ± 0.652.12 ± 0.49***2.65 ± 0.732.27 ± 0.52***
    Metal3.78 ± 0.443.89 ± 0.33ns4.00 ± 0.003.44 ± 0.53ns3.89 ± 0.223.67 ± 0.35ns
    Flow phenomena2.93 ± 0.821.98 ± 0.77***3.00 ± 0.922.18 ± 0.62***2.97 ± 0.792.08 ± 0.62***
    Contrast
    Vertebral body/disk2.38 ± 0.962.12 ± 0.80*1.93 ± 1.021.18 ± 0.47***2.16 ± 0.861.65 ± 0.54***
    Spinal cord/CSF2.42 ± 0.981.97 ± 0.80**2.62 ± 1.081.62 ± 0.78***2.52 ± 0.931.79 ± 0.69***
    Diagnostic reliability
    Spinal cord3.03 ± 1.262.70 ± 0.89**2.93 ± 1.192.38 ± 0.78***2.98 ± 1.162.54 ± 0.77***
    • Note:—Wilcoxon rank sum test; ns indicates no significant difference between TSE and BLADE (P ≥ .05);

    • * P < .05;

    • ** P < .01;

    • *** P< .001.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Results of the quantitative evaluation: SNR and CNR

    TSEBLADE
    SNRvertebral body11.13 ± 2.939.43 ± 1.93***
    SNRvertebral disk5.61 ± 2.865.11 ± 2.50ns
    SNRCSF41.93 ± 15.2341.29 ± 14.06ns
    SNRspinal cord16.79 ± 4.5412.99 ± 2.56***
    CNRvertebral body/vertebral disk5.52 ± 4.424.32 ± 3.02ns
    CNRCSF–spinal cord25.14 ± 13.4028.30 ± 13.62ns
    • Note:—t test: ns indicates no significant difference between TSE and BLADE (P ≥ .05); *, P < .05; **, P < .01;

    • *** , P < .001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 4
1 Apr 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
BLADE in Sagittal T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
C. Fellner, C. Menzel, F.A. Fellner, C. Ginthoer, N. Zorger, A. Schreyer, E.M. Jung, S. Feuerbach, T. Finkenzeller
BLADE in Sagittal T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2010, 31 (4) 674-681; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1894

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
BLADE in Sagittal T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine
C. Fellner, C. Menzel, F.A. Fellner, C. Ginthoer, N. Zorger, A. Schreyer, E.M. Jung, S. Feuerbach, T. Finkenzeller
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2010, 31 (4) 674-681; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1894
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion Imaging of the Human Spinal Cord: Comparison with Conventional Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • CT-Guided C2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: Case Series and Clinical Outcomes
  • The Evaluation and Prediction of Laminoplasty Surgery Outcome in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Using Diffusion Tensor MRI
  • Subject-Specific Studies of CSF Bulk Flow Patterns in the Spinal Canal: Implications for the Dispersion of Solute Particles in Intrathecal Drug Delivery
Show more Spine

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire