A Noninvasive Imaging Approach to Assess Plaque Severity: The Carotid Atherosclerosis Score

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Moore WS,
   2. Barnett HJ,
   3. Beebe HG,
   4. et al

   . Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;91:566–79

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Barnett HJ,
   2. Taylor DW,
   3. Eliasziw M,
   4. et al

   . Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421–28

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Virmani R,
   2. Kolodgie FD,
   3. Burke AP,
   4. et al

   . Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1262–75

   FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Toussaint JF,
   2. LaMuraglia GM,
   3. Southern JF,
   4. et al

   . Magnetic resonance images: lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation 1996;94:932–38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Saam T,
   2. Ferguson MS,
   3. Yarnykh VL,
   4. et al

   . Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:234–39

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Fayad ZA,
   2. Fuster V

   . Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;902:173–86

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Murphy RE,
   2. Moody AR,
   3. Morgan PS,
   4. et al

   . Prevalence of complicated carotid atheroma as detected by magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:3053–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Yuan C,
   2. Zhang SX,
   3. Polissar NL,
   4. et al

   . Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation 2002;105:181–85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Cai J,
    3. Ma L,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. Radiology 2006;240:464–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Altaf N,
    2. Daniels L,
    3. Morgan PS,
    4. et al

    . Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:337–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Takaya N,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Chu B,
    4. et al

    . Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 2006;37:818–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Singh N,
    2. Moody AR,
    3. Gladstone DJ,
    4. et al

    . Moderate carotid artery stenosis: MR imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage predicts risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events in asymptomatic men. Radiology 2009;252:502–08

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Kerwin WS,
    3. Yarnykh VL,
    4. et al

    . MRI of atherosclerosis in clinical trials. NMR Biomed 2006;19:636–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Underhill HR,
    2. Yarnykh VL,
    3. Hatsukami TS,
    4. et al

    . Carotid plaque morphology and composition: initial comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic field strengths. Radiology 2008;248:550–60

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Kerwin W,
    2. Xu D,
    3. Liu F,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis: plaque analysis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007;18:371–78

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Hatsukami TS,
    2. Ross R,
    3. Polissar NL,
    4. et al

    . Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000;102:959–64

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Cai J,
    2. Hatsukami TS,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al

    . In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid-rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Circulation 2005;112:3437–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Chu B,
    2. Kampschulte A,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al

    . Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke 2004;35:1079–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Chu B,
    2. Ferguson MS,
    3. Chen H,
    4. et al

    . Cardiac magnetic resonance features of the disruption-prone and the disrupted carotid plaque. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:883–96

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Harrell FE Jr.,
    2. Lee KL,
    3. Califf RM,
    4. et al

    . Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med 1984;3:143–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Kerwin WS,
    3. Chu B,
    4. et al

    . Sample size calculation for clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging for the quantitative assessment of carotid atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7:799–808

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Underhill HR,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Zhao XQ,
    4. et al

    . Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on carotid plaque morphology and composition in moderately hypercholesterolemic patients: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging trial. Am Heart J 2008;155:584 e581–88. Epub 2008 Jan 18

    PubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Glagov S,
    2. Weisenberg E,
    3. Zarins CK,
    4. et al

    . Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1371–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Babiarz LS,
    2. Astor B,
    3. Mohamed MA,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography with high-resolution black blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing carotid artery stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:63–70

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Underhill HR,
    3. Chu B,
    4. et al

    . Prevalence of American Heart Association type VI carotid atherosclerotic lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging for different levels of stenosis as measured by duplex ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1014–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Dong L,
    2. Underhill HR,
    3. Yu W,
    4. et al

    . Geometric and compositional appearance of atheroma in an angiographically normal carotid artery in patients with atherosclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:311–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. O'Leary DH,
    2. Polak JF,
    3. Kronmal RA,
    4. et al

    . Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults: Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:14–22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Touboul PJ,
    2. Labreuche J,
    3. Vicaut E,
    4. et al

    . Carotid intima-media thickness, plaques, and Framingham risk score as independent determinants of stroke risk. Stroke 2005;36:1741–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Prati P,
    2. Tosetto A,
    3. Vanuzzo D,
    4. et al

    . Carotid intima media thickness and plaques can predict the occurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular events. Stroke 2008;39:2470–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Moody AR,
    2. Murphy RE,
    3. Morgan PS,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:3047–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Bryan RN,
    2. Cai J,
    3. Burke G,
    4. et al

    . Prevalence and anatomic characteristics of infarct-like lesions on MR images of middle-aged adults: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1273–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Manolio TA,
    2. Kronmal RA,
    3. Burke GL,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance abnormalities and cardiovascular disease in older adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke 1994;25:318–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.
    1. Yarnykh VL,
    2. Yuan C

    . T1-insensitive flow suppression using quadruple inversion-recovery. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:899–905

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.
    1. Yarnykh VL,
    2. Yuan C

    . Multislice double inversion-recovery black-blood imaging with simultaneous slice reinversion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:478–83

    CrossRefPubMed