Discrimination between Metastasis and Glioblastoma Multiforme Based on Morphometric Analysis of MR Images

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Mangiola A,
   2. De Bonis P,
   3. Maira G,
   4. et al

   . Invasive tumor cells and prognosis in a selected population of patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer 2008;113:841–46

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Gavrilovic IT,
   2. Posner JB

   . Brain metastases: epidemiology and pathophysiology. J Neurooncol 2005;75:5–14

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Giese A,
   2. Bjerkvig R,
   3. Berens ME,
   4. et al

   . Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1624–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Claes A,
   2. Idema AJ,
   3. Wesseling P

   . Diffuse glioma growth: a guerilla war. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114:443–58. Epub 2007 Sep 6

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Frieboes HB,
   2. Zheng X,
   3. Sun C-H,
   4. et al

   . An integrated computational/experimental model of tumor invasion. Cancer Res 2006;66:1597–604

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Frieboes HB,
   2. Lowengrub JS,
   3. Wise S,
   4. et al

   . Computer simulation of glioma growth and morphology. Neuroimage 2007;37:S59–70

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Stein AM,
   2. Demuth T,
   3. Mobley D,
   4. et al

   . A mathematical model of glioblastoma tumor spheroid invasion in a three-dimensional in vitro experiment. Biophys J 2007;92:356–65. Epub 2006 Oct 13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Al-Okaili RN,
   2. Krejza J,
   3. Woo JH,
   4. et al

   . Intraaxial brain masses: MR imaging based diagnostic strategy—initial experience. Radiology 2007;243:539–50

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Wang S,
   2. Kim S,
   3. Chawla S,
   4. et al

   . Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2009;44:653–60

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Chiang IC,
    2. Kuo Y-T,
    3. Lu C-Y,
    4. et al

    . Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings. Neuroradiology 2004;46:619–27. Epub 2004 Jul 9

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Law M,
    2. Cha S,
    3. Knopp EA,
    4. et al

    . High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology 2002;222:715–22

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Opstad KS,
    2. Murphy MM,
    3. Wilkins PR,
    4. et al

    . Differentiation of metastases from high-grade gliomas using short echo time 1H spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:187–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Fan G,
    2. Sun B,
    3. Wu Z,
    4. et al

    . In vivo single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases. Clin Radiol 2004;59:77–85

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Devos A,
    2. Simonetti AW,
    3. Van Der Graaf M,
    4. et al

    . The use of multivariate MR imaging intensities versus metabolic data from MR spectroscopic imaging for brain tumor classification. J Magn Reson 2005;173:218–28

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Devos A,
    2. Lukas L,
    3. Suykens JAK,
    4. et al

    . Classification of brain tumors using short echo time 1H MR spectra. J Magn Reson 2004;170:164–75

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. García-Gómez JM,
    2. Luts J,
    3. Julià-Sapé M,
    4. et al

    . Multiproject-multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Resn Mater Phy 2009;22:5–18

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. Herlidou-Même S,
    2. Constans JM,
    3. Carsin B,
    4. et al

    . MRI texture analysis on texture test objects, normal brain and intracranial tumors. Magn Res Imaging 2003;21:989–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Georgiadis P,
    2. Cavouras D,
    3. Kalatzis I,
    4. et al

    . Improving brain tumor characterization on MRI by probabilistic neural networks and non-linear transformation of textural feature. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008;89:24–32. Epub 2007 Nov 28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Georgiadis P,
    2. Cavouras D,
    3. Kalatzis I,
    4. et al

    . Enhancing the discrimination accuracy between metastases, gliomas and meningiomas on brain MRI by volumetric textural features and ensemble pattern recognition methods. Magn Res Imaging 2009;27:120–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Massart DL,
    2. Vandeginste BG,
    3. Buydens LMC,
    4. et al

    . Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1998
21. 21.↵
    1. Le Cam L,
    2. Neyman J

    1. McQueen J

    . Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Le Cam L, Neyman J eds. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, California: University of California; 1967:281–97
22. 22.↵
    1. Calli C,
    2. Kitis O,
    3. Yunten N,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors. Eur Radiol 2006;58:394–403

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Rollin N,
    2. Guyotat J,
    3. Streichenberger N,
    4. et al

    . Clinical relevance of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in assessing intra-axial brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2006;48:150–59

    CrossRefPubMed