Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Measuring Myelin Repair and Axonal Loss with Diffusion Tensor Imaging

R.J. Fox, T. Cronin, J. Lin, X. Wang, K. Sakaie, D. Ontaneda, S.Y. Mahmoud, M.J. Lowe and M.D. Phillips
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2011, 32 (1) 85-91; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2238
R.J. Fox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Cronin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Lin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Sakaie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Ontaneda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.Y. Mahmoud
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.J. Lowe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.D. Phillips
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DTI is an MR imaging measure of brain tissue integrity and provides an attractive metric for use in neuroprotection clinical trials. The purpose of our study was to use DTI to evaluate the longitudinal changes in brain tissue integrity in a group of patients with MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with MS starting natalizumab were imaged serially for 12 months. Gadolinium-enhancing lesions and 20 regions of interest from normal-appearing white and gray matter brain tissue were followed longitudinally. Average values within each region of interest were derived for FA, λ∥, λ⊥, and MD. New T1 black holes were identified at 12 months. Analysis was performed by using mixed-model regression analysis with slope (ie, DTI change per month) as the dependent variable.

RESULTS: During 1 year, FA increased in gadolinium-enhancing lesions but decreased in NABT (P < .0001 for both). Changes in FA within gadolinium-enhancing lesions were driven by decreased λ⊥ (P < .001), and within NABT, by decreased λ∥ (P < .0001). A higher λ⊥ within gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline predicted conversion to T1 black holes at 12 months. MD was unchanged in both gadolinium-enhancing lesions and NABT.

CONCLUSIONS: We observed changes in DTI measures during 1 year in both gadolinium-enhancing lesions and NABT. The DTI results may represent possible remyelination within acute lesions and chronic axonal degeneration in NAWM. These results support the use of DTI as a measure of tissue integrity for studies of neuroprotective therapies.

Abbreviations

AFNI
Analysis of Functional NeuroImages
DTI
diffusion tensor imaging
EAE
experimental allergic encephalomyelitis
FA
fractional anisotropy
λ∥
axial diffusivity
λ⊥
radial or transverse diffusivity
MD
mean diffusivity
MPRAGE
magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo
MS
multiple sclerosis
NABT
normal-appearing brain tissue
NAWM
normal-appearing white matter
n.s.
not significant
ROI
region of interest

MS is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Conventional MR imaging readily identifies the classic hallmarks of MS in white matter yet has distinct disadvantages.1 Focal lesions identify areas of active inflammation and tissue injury but do not characterize the degree of tissue injury. Despite an absence of new lesions in patients with progressive MS, chronic progressive disability is observed for many years. Altogether, conventional imaging is a poor measure of the degree of acute injury, later recovery, and chronic degeneration. More advanced imaging modalities are needed to characterize the degree of tissue injury and its response to therapies more accurately.

DTI is a quantitative MR imaging technique that measures the 3D diffusion of water molecules within tissue through the application of multiple diffusion gradients.2 The power of diffusion techniques comes from measurement of molecular probing of tissue structures by water molecules at a microscopic scale well beyond the typical MR imaging resolution. By measuring the interaction of water molecules with cell membranes, myelin sheaths, and macromolecules, tissue integrity can be inferred.3 Tissue has physical structures that limit diffusion in different directions, so diffusion is typically described as a 3D ellipsoid through a 3 × 3 matrix. In nervous tissue, the largest (or primary) ellipsoid eigenvector represents diffusion along the length of a fiber tract and so is referred to as the λ∥. The other shorter 2 ellipsoid eigenvectors, when averaged together, are called λ⊥. Clinical and pathologic studies have found that λ∥ tends to reflect axonal integrity, whereas λ⊥ corresponds more closely to myelin integrity.4–9 Animal and human studies suggest that λ∥ and λ⊥ are approximate measures of axonal and myelin integrity, particularly in acute injury.

Diffusion ellipsoids in highly organized fiber tracts (eg, pyramidal tracts and the corpus callosum) are very elongated. The absence of fiber tracts in gray matter makes diffusion ellipsoids less elongated, though gray matter still demonstrates some anisotropy. FA is a common metric to describe the degree of diffusion directionality or elongation. A high FA within a single voxel would signify that diffusion occurs predominantly along a single axis. A low FA would signify that diffusion occurs along all 3 cardinal axes. An overall measure of diffusion magnitude is described by MD, which ignores anisotropy and simply describes the overall magnitude of diffusion.

Given the limited dynamic range of conventional imaging to characterize tissue integrity, DTI is an attractive alternative to conventional imaging for measuring tissue integrity in longitudinal MS studies and the potential impact of therapy. Although several studies have correlated DTI measures with functional performance,10–12 little is known about how DTI measures tissue recovery and later degeneration. Similarly, to our knowledge, few studies have evaluated the changes in brain tissue during treatment with natalizumab, and no studies have evaluated patients with MS after starting immunomodulating therapy. In this study, we evaluated the longitudinal change in DTI measures within focal brain regions of patients with MS starting highly effective anti-inflammatory therapy. Specifically, we evaluated the ability of DTI of the brain to characterize changes following acute inflammatory injury and chronic changes in NABT. We hypothesized that longitudinal DTI imaging will measure changes in brain tissue integrity in both gadolinium-enhancing lesions and NABT.

Materials and Methods

Participants

After obtaining local institutional review board approval, we enrolled 22 patients with MS into a longitudinal observational DTI study starting treatment with natalizumab, with baseline MR imaging immediately before the first natalizumab infusion. Patients were enrolled sequentially into this natural history study from an academic specialty clinical center. Inclusion criteria were clinically definite MS by the Revised McDonald Diagnostic Criteria, age >18 years, and ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria were clinical relapse or steroid treatment in the previous 8 weeks (to minimize the potential confounding of corticosteroids), pregnancy, and contraindications to MR imaging, such as severe claustrophobia and implanted devices, such as neurostimulators, pacemakers, and so forth. Patients with MS started natalizumab for clinical indications, according to the US Food and Drug Administration label. Because this was a small pilot study funded by the National Institutes of Health and National Multiple Sclerosis Society, no untreated controls were studied. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. One patient discontinued imaging follow-up after only 2 months and was removed from the data analysis.

MR Imaging Protocol

Imaging was performed on a 3T Trio scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Diffusion-weighted imaging used 71 noncollinear diffusion-weighting gradients (2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm voxels, b=2000 s/mm2, 8 b=0 acquisitions, 256 × 256 mm FOV, 102 × 102 matrix, forty-eight 2.5-mm thick sections, TE/TR = 95/7300 ms). Anatomic imaging was performed for lesion detection and coregistration: 3D MPRAGE (256 × 256 mm FOV, 256 × 128 matrix, one hundred twenty 1.2-mm thick sections, TE/TR = 1.71/1900 ms), proton attenuation/T2-weighted (230 × 230 mm FOV, 320 × 320 matrix, forty-eight 3-mm sections, TE1/TE2/TR = 20/91/3600 ms), and T1 fast low-angle shot (230 × 230 mm FOV, 320 × 320 matrix, forty-eight 3-mm sections, TE/TR = 2.46/300 ms, flip angle = 75°) postgadolinium (0.1 mmol/kg). Total time of each DTI scan was 10 minutes, 40 seconds, for a total scanning time of 47 minutes, 14 seconds. Conventional and DTI images were assessed within a few days of acquisition for quality, and patients returned for repeat acquisition if significant artifacts (ie, spike artifacts, motion) were observed.

Image Analysis

At baseline, all gadolinium-enhancing lesions and 20 regions of interest from NABT (Fig 1) were drawn on each subject by using AFNI.13 For gadolinium-enhancing lesions, regions of interest were drawn over the gadolinium-enhancing region of the lesion on postgadolinium T1-weighted images. For NABT, regions of interest were drawn onto the FA maps to improve the accuracy of longitudinal coregistration. NABT regions of interest were chosen to represent varied white matter and deep gray matter regions. NABT regions of interest were not drawn on areas that showed abnormal signal intensity on either T1-weighted or T2-weighted images at baseline or any follow-up scan. Tissue immediately adjacent to CSF was not included in either gadolinium-enhanced lesions or NABT because of possible later coregistration errors that may include CSF. Regions of interest were followed longitudinally by coregistration of anatomic T1-MPRAGE images acquired at months 1, 2, 6, and 12 to the T1-MPRAGE image acquired at baseline by using Functional MRI of the Brain Software Library.14 Regions of interest were inspected through AFNI at each time point to confirm the accuracy of coregistration and were adjusted when necessary. The reproducibility of these measures in NABT by using this coregistration technique was shown in a previous study, with a median coefficient of variation over 3 annual scans of 9.59% for FA, 2.21% for apparent diffusion coefficient (comparable with MD), 3.70% for λ∥, and 4.19% for λ⊥. Enhancing lesions at baseline were classified at 12 months as either isointense or hypointense (black holes) on T1 images. Isointensity was defined as an inability to visualize any portion of the lesion on nonenhanced T1 images. T1-hole designation at 12 months was then confirmed by a second investigator, and both investigators were blinded to DTI measures. Average values within each region of interest were derived for FA, λ⊥, λ∥, and MD. For descriptive purposes, QBrain Version 1.1.20.0 (Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Leiden, the Netherlands) was used to measure T2 lesion volumes.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Sample regions of interest drawn on a single patient. NABT regions of interest are drawn on FA maps (A−F), and gadolinium-enhancing lesions are drawn on a postgadolinium T1-weighted MPRAGE image (G). The asymmetric placement of regions of interest in A demonstrates a T2 lesion in the right centrum semiovale (T2 images not shown) in which the region of interest had to be shifted anteriorly.

Statistical Analysis

Longitudinal analysis and group comparisons were performed by using mixed-model analysis, with slope (ie, DTI change per month) as the dependent variable. The ability of baseline DTI measures within gadolinium-enhancing lesions to predict T1 black holes at 12 months was evaluated by using either a Satterthwaite or pooled t test, depending on equality of variances for each DTI measure. All assumptions of each statistical model were met. Because of multiple comparisons, significance was set at P < .01. Statistical analysis was performed by 1 coauthor (X.W.). Because this was an exploratory study and few longitudinal DTI data are available in patients with MS, no formal power calculations were performed.

Results

A description of the 21 patients with MS is found in the Table. As a group, these patients are similar to those in previous natalizumab clinical trials (Miller, Polman, Rudick).32–34 At baseline, 11 of 21 patients demonstrated a total of 60 (median = 5) enhancing lesions. At 12 months, 26 (43%) of those enhancing lesions were T1 black holes. There was 85% compliance with natalizumab therapy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Description of the 21 patients with MSa

DTI Changes Following Acute Inflammatory Injury

During 1 year, FA increased in gadolinium-enhancing lesions (+2.10/month, P < .0001; Fig 2). This increase was most prominent during the first 2 months and then became more gradual. Changes in FA within gadolinium-enhancing lesions were driven by decreased λ⊥ (−1.95 10−6 mm2/s/month, P < .003). MD was unchanged in gadolinium-enhancing lesions (P = n.s., data not shown).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Change in DTI measures within gadolinium-enhancing lesions during 1 year. A, FA. B, λ∥. C, λ⊥. FA is unitless (10−3); axial and radial diffusivities are 10−6 mm2/s.

Higher λ⊥ within gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline predicted conversion to T1 black holes at 12 months (P = .0007). FA at baseline showed a trend for predicting T1 black holes at 12 months (P = .011). Changes in DTI measures during 1 year did not differ between enhancing lesions that became T1 black holes and lesions that did not become T1 black holes (Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Change in DTI measures between gadolinium-enhancing lesions that evolved into T1 holes by 12 months and gadolinium-enhancing lesions that did not evolve into T1 black holes by 12 months. A, FA. B, λ∥. C, λ⊥. No-black-hole-versus-black-hole comparison refers to comparison slopes. FA is unitless (10−3); axial and radial diffusivities are 10−6 mm2/s.

DTI Changes in NABT

During 1 year, FA decreased in NABT (−1.02/month, P < .0001; Fig 4). This decrease was gradual during the entire 12-month follow-up. Changes in FA within NABT were driven by decreased λ∥ (−1.92 10−6 mm2/s/month, P < .0001). MD was unchanged in NABT (P = n.s., data not shown).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Change in DTI measures within normal-appearing brain regions of interest during 1 year. A, FA. B, λ∥. C, λ⊥. FA is unitless (10−3); λ∥ and λ⊥ are 10−6 mm2/s.

Discussion

We used longitudinal evaluation of patients with MS starting anti-inflammatory therapy to evaluate the ability of DTI to characterize changes within areas of focal inflammatory injury. Within gadolinium-enhancing lesions, we observed increased FA and decreased λ⊥ during the first 2 months. Remyelination is well-known to occur following acute demyelination injury,15–17 and the reduction in λ⊥ may represent an imaging correlate of remyelination. Experimental animal studies have suggested that λ⊥ is a somewhat specific measure of myelin integrity. Demyelination without axonal injury is induced in cuprizone-treated mice, and changes in λ⊥ paralleled pathologically confirmed demyelination and remyelination.18 DTI studies in shiverer mice (who have congenital dysmyelination with intact axons) found increased λ⊥ but normal λ∥.9 In the EAE mouse model, focal regions of myelin loss are associated with decreased λ⊥.4 Animal ischemia studies also found increased λ⊥ but no change λ∥, and histopathology showed reduced myelination.19 DTI studies from a mouse traumatic brain injury model found reduced FA and λ∥, which corresponded to increased staining for amyloid precursor protein and neurofilament, both indicators of axonal injury.20 Altogether, these animal imaging studies suggest that the changes in λ⊥ we observed within gadolinium-enhancing lesions possibly represent remyelination.

An alternative pathologic explanation for the longitudinal increased FA within gadolinium-enhancing lesions is resolution of edema and inflammatory infiltrates. However, DTI studies from other cerebral edema models suggest that there is little contribution of resolving edema to our DTI observations. Cerebral edema from hepatic encephalopathy is associated with increased MD and variable changes in FA.21,22 After lactulose therapy for hepatic encephalopathy, MD decreased while FA did not change.22 Peritumoral edema shows both a decrease in FA and an increase in apparent diffusion coefficient (which is comparable with MD).23,24 Individual eigenvalue analysis of peritumoral edema showed increase in both λ⊥ and λ∥. In contrast, we observed no change in either MD or λ∥. Furthermore, we observed a change in λ⊥ alone, with no change in λ∥. Although the resolution of gadolinium-enhancing lesions likely involves some resolving edema, comparison of our DTI observations with those from hepatic encephalopathy and cerebral tumors suggest that this represents only a small proportion of tissue recovery.

Chronic T1 hypointensities (T1 black holes) are associated with severe tissue damage, as measured by axonal loss, axonal swelling, and demyelination.25–27 To date, no published studies have evaluated DTI predictors of conversion from gadolinium-enhancing lesions to T1 black holes. In our study, approximately half of the gadolinium-enhancing lesions developed into T1 black holes by 12 months. λ⊥ within gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline predicted evolution into T1 black holes, and a trend was observed with FA. In contrast, we observed no difference in change in DTI measures during 1 year of follow-up between gadolinium-enhancing lesions that became T1 black holes and those that did not. These observations suggest that evolution of gadolinium-enhancing lesions into T1 black holes is influenced predominantly by the degree of initial injury and not the amount of later recovery. These observations also add to the accumulating evidence that DTI is a quantitative measure of the degree of brain tissue injury.

We also applied DTI to study changes in NABT with time during MS therapy. This longitudinal analysis showed gradual decline in FA during 1 year of follow-up. In contrast to enhancing lesions, this decline was driven by a decrease in λ∥, with no significant change in λ⊥. Animal studies of inflammatory injury found a relative specificity of λ∥ to represent axonal injury. DTI studies of the spinal cord of mice with EAE showed decreased λ⊥ throughout the cord, which correlated with increased staining of antibodies against the axonal-relevant β-amyloid precursor protein.4 Retinal ischemia causes wallerian degeneration of the optic nerve, leaving myelin intact for a period of time. Three days after induction of retinal ischemia, DTI of the optic nerve shows decreased λ∥ with no change in λ⊥.8 Subsequent pathology confirmed axonal degeneration without demyelination. A study of patients with corpus callosotomy found an early decrease in λ∥ in the white matter adjacent to the surgery, which was followed by a later decline in λ⊥.6 This imaging time course parallels the wallerian degeneration following axonotomy, with distal axonal loss first, followed later by myelin loss.

These animal studies suggest that our observed decline in λ∥ represents an ongoing degenerative process outside of demyelinating lesions, which preferentially affects axonal integrity. The changes we observed continued despite anti-inflammatory therapy. Continued degeneration in NABT was also observed as accelerated brain atrophy in natalizumab-treated patients compared with healthy controls.28 Our studies suggest that a similar process driven by axonal loss may be occurring in the NABT in patients with MS, even in the absence of active inflammation as measured by clinical relapses and gadolinium-enhancing lesions. There was no change with time in MD within NABT, which suggests that changes in FA and λ∥ were not secondary to resolution of generalized edema.

There are few other longitudinal DTI studies in MS, and no studies have evaluated patients after starting a specific therapy. One 18-month study of untreated patients with MS found increased MD and decreased FA with time in chronic MS lesions. MD also increased in normal-appearing gray matter, but not NAWM.29 Another study of mostly patients with progressive MS found that MD (but not FA) increased during 2.4 years in NAWM.30 We studied patients at an earlier stage of disease and after starting anti-inflammatory therapy, so our observations more accurately characterize a stage of disease that has greater potential for tissue recovery. In addition, we were able to characterize the continued neurodegeneration in NABT, despite cessation of active inflammation. Finally, compared with our study using 71 diffusion gradients, both previous DTI studies used an 8-direction pulse sequence. It has been shown that at least 20 and 30 directions are necessary for robust determination of anisotropy and mean diffusivity, respectively.31

In an open-label study with no formal control group, it may be difficult for our data to differentiate the effect of anti-inflammatory therapy from the natural course of MS. Gadolinium enhancement always resolves, so the increase in FA may be secondary simply to the natural resolution of inflammation in this disease. DTI measures vary from 1 brain region to another and from 1 patient to another, making comparison studies difficult to interpret. Our longitudinal comparison of the same brain regions within the same patients minimized this problem. Furthermore, there is no pathologic data comparing treated and untreated patients with MS, making it difficult to extrapolate imaging data to pathologic changes. Future studies comparing treated and untreated patients are needed to identify the effects of MS therapy on DTI measures of tissue integrity more clearly. This study enrolled patients with MS with variable disease duration and different prior MS therapies, irrespective of other comorbid conditions. Although this process introduces variability in the dataset, it also allows greater generalization of this dataset to general clinical practice and future clinical trials. Indeed, the subjects are representative of both the general MS population and those studied in the major natalizumab clinical trials, making these observations widely applicable to the general MS patient population.

It is well-established that natalizumab therapy reduces new lesions as measured by conventional imaging,32–34 but less known is the impact of any immunosuppressive therapy on advanced imaging measures. The rate of progressive brain atrophy is slower in patients treated with natalizumab, but only in the second year of therapy.28 Natalizumab therapy was associated with a reduction in conversion of gadolinium-enhancing lesions into T1 black holes.35 No studies have evaluated the potential impact of natalizumab therapy on advanced imaging measures, such as DTI. Natalizumab prevents leukocyte adhesion to the capillary endothelial surface, thereby reducing leukocyte transmigration into the central nervous system.36,37 Natalizumab is associated with a rapid and robust reduction in the development of new gadolinium-enhancing lesions,32 which is expected to create a less inflammatory environment, thus allowing more effective repair. Furthermore, enhancing lesions in patients started on natalizumab are less likely to later convert to T1 black holes.35 These observations suggest that natalizumab therapy may have a positive impact on tissue integrity, even in regions with active inflammation.

Our observation suggests that during treatment with natalizumab, there is tissue recovery in areas of active inflammation, as measured by increased FA and reduced λ⊥. Perhaps more important, we observed continued decline in FA and λ∥ within NABT, despite treatment with a highly effective anti-inflammatory therapy. These observations add further evidence to the pathophysiologic separation between inflammation and degeneration.38,39 Additional studies are needed to compare our observations in natalizumab-treated patients with MS with untreated patients with MS.

Our results imply that DTI may provide pathology-specific insights into MS, because FA was driven by different eigenvectors in gadolinium enhancing lesions and NABT. If axial and radial diffusion indeed are relatively specific for axonal injury and demyelination, respectively, then DTI may be a useful biomarker of tissue recovery and later degeneration. Additionally, this study demonstrates that DTI is a dynamic measure of tissue integrity, with the ability to measure both short-term tissue recovery and long-term degeneration. These observations suggest that DTI may be a useful metric of therapeutic trials of tissue recovery and antidegeneration. These studies should target FA and individual diffusivities (λ⊥ for tissue recovery and λ∥ for antidegeneration) instead of MD, because these appear to be more dynamic metrics with time.

Conclusions

We observed changes in DTI measures during 1 year in both gadolinium-enhancing lesions and NABT. The DTI results may represent possible remyelination within acute lesions and chronic axonal degeneration in NAWM. Evolution of gadolinium-enhancing lesions into T1 black holes is related more to the degree of initial injury than the degree of later recovery. These results support the use of DTI as a measure of tissue integrity for studies of neuroprotective therapies.

Footnotes

  • The corresponding author takes full responsibility for the data, analysis, and interpretation and had full access to all data. Statistical analysis was performed by coauthor Dr Xiaofeng Wang.

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (K23NS47211), National Multiple Sclerosis Society (RG 3548A2), and Nancy Davis Center Without Walls.

  • Paper previously presented in part at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, May 16–21, 2009; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and the American Academy of Neurology, April 25-May 2, 2009; Seattle, Washington.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fox RJ
    . Picturing multiple sclerosis: conventional and diffusion tensor imaging. Semin Neurol 2008;28:453–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Basser PJ,
    2. Pierpaoli C
    . Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson 1996;111:209–19
    CrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pierpaoli C,
    2. Basser PJ
    . Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:893–906
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kim JH,
    2. Budde MD,
    3. Liang HF,
    4. et al
    . Detecting axon damage in spinal cord from a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis 2006;21:626–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. DeBoy CA,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Dike S,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of axonal damage in focal inflammatory and demyelinating lesions in rat spinal cord. Brain 2007;130:2199–210
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Concha L,
    2. Gross DW,
    3. Wheatley BM,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging of time-dependent axonal and myelin degradation after corpus callosotomy in epilepsy patients. Neuroimage 2006;32:1090–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schmierer K,
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    3. Boulby PA,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain. Neuroimage 2007;35:467–77. Epub 2006 Dec 16
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Song SK,
    2. Sun SW,
    3. Ju WK,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia. Neuroimage 2003;20:1714–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Song SK,
    2. Sun SW,
    3. Ramsbottom MJ,
    4. et al
    . Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage 2002;17:1429–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fox RJ,
    2. McColl RW,
    3. Lee JC,
    4. et al
    . A preliminary validation study of diffusion tensor imaging as a measure of functional brain injury. Arch Neurol 2008;65:1179–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lowe MJ,
    2. Horenstein C,
    3. Hirsch JG,
    4. et al
    . Functional pathway-defined MRI diffusion measures reveal increased transverse diffusivity of water in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2006;32:1127–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Naismith RT,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Tutlam NT,
    4. et al
    . Disability in optic neuritis correlates with diffusion tensor-derived directional diffusivities. Neurology 2009;72:589–94
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Cox RW
    . AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996;29:162–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Woolrich MW,
    4. et al
    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(suppl 1):S208–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Prineas JW,
    2. Barnard RO,
    3. Kwon EE,
    4. et al
    . Multiple sclerosis: remyelination of nascent lesions. Ann Neurol 1993;33:137–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Raine CS,
    2. Wu E
    . Multiple sclerosis: remyelination in acute lesions. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1993;52:199–204
    PubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Prineas JW,
    2. Kwon EE,
    3. Cho ES,
    4. et al
    . Continual breakdown and regeneration of myelin in progressive multiple sclerosis plaques. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1984;436:11–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Song SK,
    2. Yoshino J,
    3. Le TQ,
    4. et al
    . Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage 2005;26:132–40
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Wu EX,
    3. Tam CN,
    4. et al
    . Characterization of white matter injury in a hypoxic-ischemic neonatal rat model by diffusion tensor MRI. Stroke 2008;39:2348–53
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mac Donald CL,
    2. Dikranian K,
    3. Song SK,
    4. et al
    . Detection of traumatic axonal injury with diffusion tensor imaging in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2007;205:116–31
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kumar R,
    2. Gupta RK,
    3. Elderkin-Thompson V,
    4. et al
    . Voxel-based diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of low-grade hepatic encephalopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1061–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kale RA,
    2. Gupta RK,
    3. Saraswat VA,
    4. et al
    . Demonstration of interstitial cerebral edema with diffusion tensor MR imaging in type C hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 2006;43:698–706
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Toh CH,
    2. Castillo M,
    3. Wong AM,
    4. et al
    . Differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas with use of diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1630–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sundgren PC,
    2. Fan X,
    3. Weybright P,
    4. et al
    . Differentiation of recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1131–42
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. van Walderveen MA,
    2. Kamphorst W,
    3. Scheltens P,
    4. et al
    . Histopathologic correlate of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted spin-echo MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1998;50:1282–88
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bitsch A,
    2. Kuhlmann T,
    3. Stadelmann C,
    4. et al
    . A longitudinal MRI study of histopathologically defined hypointense multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 2001;49:793–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Fisher E,
    2. Chang A,
    3. Fox RJ,
    4. et al
    . Imaging correlates of axonal swelling in chronic multiple sclerosis brains. Ann Neurol 2007;62:219–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Miller DH,
    2. Soon D,
    3. Fernando KT,
    4. et al
    . MRI outcomes in a placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab in relapsing MS. Neurology 2007;68:1390–401
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Oreja-Guevara C,
    2. Rovaris M,
    3. Iannucci G,
    4. et al
    . Progressive gray matter damage in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Neurol 2005;62:578–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Agosta F,
    2. Absinta M,
    3. Sormani MP,
    4. et al
    . In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain 2007;130:2211–19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jones DK
    . The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:807–15
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Miller DH,
    2. Khan OA,
    3. Sheremata WA,
    4. et al
    . A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. New Engl J Med 2003;348:15–23
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rudick RA,
    2. Stuart WH,
    3. Calabresi PA,
    4. et al
    . Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2006;354:911–23
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Polman C,
    2. O'Connor P,
    3. Havrdova E,
    4. et al
    . Clinical results from AFFIRM: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentrer trial to determine the efficacy and safety of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Neurology 2005;64(suppl 1):A146
  35. 35.↵
    1. Dalton CM,
    2. Miszkiel KA,
    3. Barker GJ,
    4. et al
    . Effect of natalizumab on conversion of gadolinium-enhancing lesions to T1 hypointense lesions in relapsing multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2004;251:407–13
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Brocke S,
    2. Piercy C,
    3. Steinman L,
    4. et al
    . Antibodies to CD44 and integrin alpha4, but not L-selectin, prevent central nervous system inflammation and experimental encephalomyelitis by blocking secondary leukocyte recruitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:6896–901
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Yednock TA,
    2. Cannon C,
    3. Fritz LC,
    4. et al
    . Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against alpha 4 beta 1 integrin. Nature 1992;356:63–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Trapp BD,
    2. Nave KA
    . Multiple sclerosis: an immune or neurodegenerative disorder? Annu Rev Neurosci 2008;31:247–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Imitola J,
    2. Chitnis T,
    3. Khoury SJ
    . Insights into the molecular pathogenesis of progression in multiple sclerosis: potential implications for future therapies. Arch Neurol 2006;63:25–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received March 15, 2010.
  • Accepted after revision May 31, 2010.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 1
1 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring Myelin Repair and Axonal Loss with Diffusion Tensor Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.J. Fox, T. Cronin, J. Lin, X. Wang, K. Sakaie, D. Ontaneda, S.Y. Mahmoud, M.J. Lowe, M.D. Phillips
Measuring Myelin Repair and Axonal Loss with Diffusion Tensor Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2011, 32 (1) 85-91; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2238

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Measuring Myelin Repair and Axonal Loss with Diffusion Tensor Imaging
R.J. Fox, T. Cronin, J. Lin, X. Wang, K. Sakaie, D. Ontaneda, S.Y. Mahmoud, M.J. Lowe, M.D. Phillips
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2011, 32 (1) 85-91; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2238
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Dynamic Changes in Long-Standing Multiple Sclerosis Revealed by Longitudinal Structural Network Analysis Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging
  • Patterning Chronic Active Demyelination in Slowly Expanding/Evolving White Matter MS Lesions
  • Imaging outcome measures of neuroprotection and repair in MS: A consensus statement from NAIMS
  • The Use of Noncontrast Quantitative MRI to Detect Gadolinium-Enhancing Multiple Sclerosis Brain Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Natalizumab for Multiple Sclerosis: A Case in Point for the Impact of Translational Neuroimmunology
  • T1 Recovery Is Predominantly Found in Black Holes and Is Associated with Clinical Improvement in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
  • Measuring Brain Tissue Integrity during 4 Years Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging
  • White Matter Diffusion Changes during the First Year of Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • Natalizumab in progressive MS: Results of an open-label, phase 2A, proof-of-concept trial
  • Pulse-Triggered DTI Sequence with Reduced FOV and Coronal Acquisition at 3T for the Assessment of the Cervical Spinal Cord in Patients with Myelitis
  • Differentiation of Tumefactive Demyelinating Lesions from High-Grade Gliomas with the Use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging
  • Crossref (102)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Progressive multiple sclerosis: prospects for disease therapy, repair, and restoration of function
    Daniel Ontaneda, Alan J Thompson, Robert J Fox, Jeffrey A Cohen
    The Lancet 2017 389 10076
  • Phase 2 Trial of Ibudilast in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
    Robert J. Fox, Christopher S. Coffey, Robin Conwit, Merit E. Cudkowicz, Trevis Gleason, Andrew Goodman, Eric C. Klawiter, Kazuko Matsuda, Michelle McGovern, Robert T. Naismith, Akshata Ashokkumar, Janel Barnes, Dixie Ecklund, Elizabeth Klingner, Maxine Koepp, Jeffrey D. Long, Sneha Natarajan, Brenda Thornell, Jon Yankey, Robert A. Bermel, Josef P. Debbins, Xuemei Huang, Patricia Jagodnik, Mark J. Lowe, Kunio Nakamura, Sridar Narayanan, Ken E. Sakaie, Bhaskar Thoomukuntla, Xiaopeng Zhou, Stephen Krieger, Enrique Alvarez, Michelle Apperson, Khurram Bashir, Bruce A. Cohen, Patricia K. Coyle, Silvia Delgado, L. Dana Dewitt, Angela Flores, Barbara S. Giesser, Myla D. Goldman, Burk Jubelt, Neil Lava, Sharon G. Lynch, Harold Moses, Daniel Ontaneda, Jai S. Perumal, Michael Racke, Pavle Repovic, Claire S. Riley, Christopher Severson, Shlomo Shinnar, Valerie Suski, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Vijayshree Yadav, Aram Zabeti
    New England Journal of Medicine 2018 379 9
  • Clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future perspectives
    Daniel Ontaneda, Robert J Fox, Jeremy Chataway
    The Lancet Neurology 2015 14 2
  • Neuropathology of substance use disorders
    Jean Lud Cadet, Veronica Bisagno, Christopher Mark Milroy
    Acta Neuropathologica 2014 127 1
  • Diffusion kurtosis imaging probes cortical alterations and white matter pathology following cuprizone induced demyelination and spontaneous remyelination
    C. Guglielmetti, J. Veraart, E. Roelant, Z. Mai, J. Daans, J. Van Audekerke, M. Naeyaert, G. Vanhoutte, R. Delgado y Palacios, J. Praet, E. Fieremans, P. Ponsaerts, J. Sijbers, A. Van der Linden, M. Verhoye
    NeuroImage 2016 125
  • A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values
    R.J. Fox, K. Sakaie, J.-C. Lee, J.P. Debbins, Y. Liu, D.L. Arnold, E.R. Melhem, C.H. Smith, M.D. Philips, M. Lowe, E. Fisher
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012 33 4
  • Natalizumab in progressive MS
    Jeppe Romme Christensen, Rikke Ratzer, Lars Börnsen, Mark Lyksborg, Ellen Garde, Tim B. Dyrby, Hartwig R. Siebner, Per S. Sorensen, Finn Sellebjerg
    Neurology 2014 82 17
  • Magnetic resonance monitoring of lesion evolution in multiple sclerosis
    Àlex Rovira, Cristina Auger, Juli Alonso
    Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 2013 6 5
  • Setting a research agenda for progressive multiple sclerosis: The International Collaborative on Progressive MS
    Robert J Fox, Alan Thompson, David Baker, Peer Baneke, Doug Brown, Paul Browne, Dhia Chandraratna, Olga Ciccarelli, Timothy Coetzee, Giancarlo Comi, Anthony Feinstein, Raj Kapoor, Karen Lee, Marco Salvetti, Kersten Sharrock, Ahmed Toosy, Paola Zaratin, Kim Zuidwijk
    Multiple Sclerosis Journal 2012 18 11
  • Promoting Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis—Recent Advances
    E. Jolanda Münzel, Anna Williams
    Drugs 2013 73 18

More in this TOC Section

  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire