3D Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Imaging: Reduced CSF Artifacts and Enhanced Sensitivity and Specificity for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bakshi R,
   2. Kamran S,
   3. Kinkel PR,
   4. et al

   . Fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging in acute and subacute cerebral intraventricular hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:629–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Noguchi K,
   2. Ogawa T,
   3. Inugami A,
   4. et al

   . Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: MR imaging with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery pulse sequences. Radiology 1995;196:773–77

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Adams JG,
   2. Melhem ER

   . Clinical usefulness of T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging of the CNS. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:529–36

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Lummel N,
   2. Wiesmann M,
   3. Bruckmann H,
   4. et al.

   The value of different magnetic resonance imaging sequences for the detection of intraventricular hemorrhages. Klin Neuroradiol 2010 Feb 28 [Epub ahead of print]
5. 5.↵
   1. Stuckey SL,
   2. Goh TD,
   3. Heffernan T,
   4. et al

   . Hyperintensity in the subarachnoid space on FLAIR MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:913–21

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Hajnal JV,
   2. Oatridge A,
   3. Herlihy AH,
   4. et al

   . Reduction of CSF artifacts on FLAIR images by using adiabatic inversion pulses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:317–22

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Herlihy AH,
   2. Hajnal JV,
   3. Curati WL,
   4. et al

   . Reduction of CSF and blood flow artifacts on FLAIR images of the brain with k-space reordered by inversion time at each slice position (KRISP). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:896–904

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Herlihy AH,
   2. Oatridge A,
   3. Curati WL,
   4. et al

   . FLAIR imaging using nonselective inversion pulses combined with slice excitation order cycling and k-space reordering to reduce flow artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:354–64

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Oatridge A,
   2. Curati WL,
   3. Herlihy AH,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of a FLAIR sequence designed to reduce CSF and blood flow artifacts by use of k-space reordered by inversion time at each slice position (KRISP) in high grade gliomas of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:251–56

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Tanaka N,
    2. Abe T,
    3. Kojima K,
    4. et al

    . Applicability and advantages of flow artifact-insensitive fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR sequences for imaging the posterior fossa. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1095–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Wu HM,
    2. Yousem DM,
    3. Chung HW,
    4. et al

    . Influence of imaging parameters on high-intensity cerebrospinal fluid artifacts in fast-FLAIR MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:393–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Wintersperger BJ,
    2. Runge VM,
    3. Biswas J,
    4. et al

    . Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling. Invest Radiol 2006;41:586–92

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Hui FK,
    3. Mugler JP 3rd..

    Suppression of cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow artifacts in FLAIR MR imaging with a single-slab three-dimensional pulse sequence: initial experience. Radiology 2001:221:251–55

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Naganawa S,
    2. Koshikawa T,
    3. Nakamura T,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1901–08

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Chagla GH,
    2. Busse RF,
    3. Sydnor R,
    4. et al

    . Three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging with isotropic resolution and nonselective adiabatic inversion provides improved three-dimensional visualization and cerebrospinal fluid suppression compared to two-dimensional flair at 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008;43:547–51

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Busse RF,
    2. Hariharan H,
    3. Vu A,
    4. et al

    . Fast spin-echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1030–37

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Bakshi R,
    2. Caruthers SD,
    3. Janardhan V,
    4. et al

    . Intraventricular CSF pulsation artifact on fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR images: analysis of 100 consecutive normal studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:503–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Jack CR Jr.,
    2. Rydberg CH,
    3. Krecke KN,
    4. et al

    . Mesial temporal sclerosis: diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1996;199:367–73

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Hashemi RH,
    2. Bradley WG Jr.,
    3. Chen DY,
    4. et al

    . Suspected multiple sclerosis: MR imaging with a thin-section fast FLAIR pulse sequence. Radiology 1995;196:505–10

    PubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Pipe JG

    . Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:963–69

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Kidwell CS,
    2. Chalela JA,
    3. Saver JL,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA 2004;292:1823–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Noguchi K,
    2. Seto H,
    3. Kamisaki Y,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging with CT in a simulated model of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:923–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Wiesmann M,
    2. Mayer TE,
    3. Yousry I,
    4. et al

    . Detection of hyperacute subarachnoid hemorrhage of the brain by using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2002;96:684–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Fiebach JB,
    2. Schellinger PD,
    3. Geletneky K,
    4. et al

    . MRI in acute subarachnoid haemorrage: findings with a standardised stroke protocol. Neuroradiology 2004;46:44–48

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Sohn CH,
    2. Baik SK,
    3. Lee HJ,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging of hyperacute subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhages at 3T: a preliminary report of gradient echo T2*-weighted sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:662–65

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Maeda M,
    2. Yagishita A,
    3. Yamamoto T,
    4. et al

    . Abnormal hyperintensity within the subarachnoid space evaluated by fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging: a spectrum of central nervous system diseases. Eur Radiol 2003;13(suppl 4):L192–201

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Essig M,
    2. Bock M

    . Contrast optimization of fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging in patients with high CSF blood or protein content. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:764–67

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Anzai Y,
    2. Ishikawa M,
    3. Shaw DW,
    4. et al

    . Paramagnetic effect of supplemental oxygen on CSF hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:274–79

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Dechambre SD,
    2. Duprez T,
    3. Grandin CB,
    4. et al

    . High signal in cerebrospinal fluid mimicking subarachnoid haemorrhage on FLAIR following acute stroke and intravenous contrast medium. Neuroradiology 2000;42:608–11

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Filippi CG,
    2. Ulug AM,
    3. Lin D,
    4. et al

    . Hyperintense signal abnormality in subarachnoid spaces and basal cisterns on MR images of children anesthetized with propofol: new fluid-attenuated inversion recovery finding. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:394–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text