Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig 1.
3D rendering of the regions of interest in a control subject: CN (red), PU (green), PA (blue), and SN (yellow). Regions of interest overlaid on the 3D T1-weighted image. A, Axial cut plane at the level of the striatum. B, Axial cut plane through the mesencephalon. C, Coronal oblique cut plane along the main axis of the SN region of interest.
- Fig 2.
Regions of interest overlaid on the quantitative maps: CN (red), PU (green), and PA (blue). Regions of interest overlaid on axial sections of a 3D T1-weighted image (A), an R2 map (B), an R2* map (C), a magnetization transfer map (D), a 3D T2-weighted image (E), MD (F), FA (G), and R1 map (H).
- Fig 3.
Group differences of R2* measurements. Error bars (95% confidence intervals) of R2* measurements (right side only) are shown clustered by diagnosis group.
Tables
Demographic details of controls and patient groups
No. Age (mean) Sex (female/male) Controls 13 67.6 ± 10.5 8:5 IPS 12 66.3 ± 7.8 2:10 MSA-P 10 62.5 ± 8.5 5:5 PSP 9 67.0 ± 4.3 2:7 Total 44 66.0 ± 8.3 17:27 -
Note:—MSA-P indicates multiple systems atrophy–type Parkinson.
-
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Automated classification of neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndromes using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in a clinical setting
- Combined Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Apparent Transverse Relaxation Rate Differentiate Parkinson Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism
- Diffusion tensor imaging in parkinsonian syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Individual Detection of Patients with Parkinson Disease using Support Vector Machine Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Data: Initial Results