Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePatient Safety

Prolonged Carotid Sinus Reflex Is a Risk Factor for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy following Carotid Artery Stenting

T. Kato, H. Sakai, M. Tsujimoto and Y. Nishimura
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2011, 32 (3) 441-445; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2344
T. Kato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Sakai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Tsujimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Nishimura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rihal CS,
    2. Textor SC,
    3. Grill DE,
    4. et al
    . Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2002;105:2259–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Levy EM,
    2. Viscoli CM,
    3. Horwitz RI
    . The effect of acute renal failure on mortality: a cohort analysis. JAMA 1996;275:1489–94
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. McCullough PA,
    2. Wolyn R,
    3. Rocher LL,
    4. et al
    . Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997;103:368–75
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nash K,
    2. Hafeez A,
    3. Hou S
    . Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:930–36
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gleeson TG,
    2. Bulugahapitiya S
    . Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1673–89
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fishbane S,
    2. Durham JH,
    3. Marzo K,
    4. et al
    . N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:251–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Maeder M,
    2. Klein M,
    3. Fehr T,
    4. et al
    . Contrast nephropathy: review focusing on prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1763–71
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Taliercio CP,
    2. Vlietstra RE,
    3. Fisher LD,
    4. et al
    . Risks for renal dysfunction with cardiac angiography. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:501–04
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Freeman RV,
    2. O'Donnell M,
    3. Share D,
    4. et al
    . Nephropathy requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary intervention and the critical role of an adjusted contrast dose. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1068–73
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lindsay J,
    2. Canos DA,
    3. Apple S,
    4. et al
    . Causes of acute renal dysfunction after percutaneous coronary intervention and comparison of late mortality rates with postprocedure rise of creatine kinase-MB versus rise of serum creatinine. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:786–89
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mehran R,
    2. Aymong ED,
    3. Nikolsky E,
    4. et al
    . A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1393–99
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dangas G,
    2. Laird JR Jr.,
    3. Satler LF,
    4. et al
    . Postprocedural hypotension after carotid artery stent placement: predictors and short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Radiology 2000;215:677–83
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Leisch F,
    2. Kerschner K,
    3. Hofmann R,
    4. et al
    . Carotid sinus reactions during carotid artery stenting: predictors, incidence, and influence on clinical outcome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:516–23
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gupta R,
    2. Abou-Chebl A,
    3. Bajzer CT,
    4. et al
    . Rate, predictors, and consequences of hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1538–43
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lin PH,
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Kougias P,
    4. et al
    . Factors associated with hypotension and bradycardia after carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:846–53, discussion 53–54
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Taha MM,
    2. Toma N,
    3. Sakaida H,
    4. et al
    . Periprocedural hemodynamic instability with carotid angioplasty and stenting. Surg Neurol 2008;70:279–85, discussion 85–86
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421–28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hobson RW 2nd.,
    2. Brott TG,
    3. Roubin GS,
    4. et al
    . Carotid artery stenting: meeting the recruitment challenge of a clinical trial. Stroke 2005;36:1314–15
    FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Rudnick MR,
    2. Berns JS,
    3. Cohen RM,
    4. et al
    . Nephrotoxic risks of renal angiography: contrast media-associated nephrotoxicity and atheroembolism—a critical review. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;24:713–27
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Matsuo S,
    2. Imai E,
    3. Horio M,
    4. et al
    . Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53:982–92
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tamakawa N,
    2. Sakai H,
    3. Nishimura Y
    . Evaluation of carotid artery plaque using IVUS virtual histology. Interv Neuroradiol 2007;13(suppl 1):100–05. Epub 2007 Jun 27
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Cigarroa RG,
    2. Lange RA,
    3. Williams RH,
    4. et al
    . Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med 1989;86:649–52
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Krol AL,
    2. Dzialowski I,
    3. Roy J,
    4. et al
    . Incidence of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients undergoing acute stroke computed tomography angiography. Stroke 2007;38:2364–66
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Dittrich R,
    2. Akdeniz S,
    3. Kloska SP,
    4. et al
    . Low rate of contrast-induced nephropathy after CT perfusion and CT angiography in acute stroke patients. J Neurol 2007;254:1491–97
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hopyan JJ,
    2. Gladstone DJ,
    3. Mallia G,
    4. et al
    . Renal safety of CT angiography and perfusion imaging in the emergency evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1826–30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Mehdiratta M,
    2. Schlaug G,
    3. Kumar S,
    4. et al
    . Reducing the delay in thrombolysis: is it necessary to await the results of renal function tests before computed tomography perfusion and angiography in patients with code stroke? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;17:273–75
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lima FO,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Levy RA,
    4. et al
    . Functional contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of acute ischemic stroke does not increase the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:817–21. Epub 2009 Dec 31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Oleinik A,
    2. Romero JM,
    3. Schwab K,
    4. et al
    . CT angiography for intracerebral hemorrhage does not increase risk of acute nephropathy. Stroke 2009;40:2393–97
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Loh Y,
    2. McArthur DL,
    3. Vespa P,
    4. et al
    . The risk of acute radiocontrast-mediated kidney injury following endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is low. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1584–87. Epub 2010 Jun 3
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Campbell DR,
    2. Flemming BK,
    3. Mason WF,
    4. et al
    . A comparative study of the nephrotoxicity of iohexol, iopamidol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography. Can Assoc Radiol J 1990;41:133–37
    PubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Moore RD,
    2. Steinberg EP,
    3. Powe NR,
    4. et al
    . Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial. Radiology 1992;182:649–55
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. McCullough PA
    . Contrast-induced acute kidney injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1419–28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lavoie P,
    2. Rutledge J,
    3. Dawoud MA,
    4. et al
    . Predictors and timing of hypotension and bradycardia after carotid artery stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1942–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Park BD,
    2. Divinagracia T,
    3. Madej O,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of clinically significant postprocedural hypotension after carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:526–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Trocciola SM,
    2. Chaer RA,
    3. Lin SC,
    4. et al
    . Analysis of parameters associated with hypotension requiring vasopressor support after carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:714–20
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Persson PB,
    2. Hansell P,
    3. Liss P
    . Pathophysiology of contrast medium-induced nephropathy. Kidney Int 2005;68:14–22
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Morikawa S,
    2. Sone T,
    3. Tsuboi H,
    4. et al
    . Renal protective effects and the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy by atrial natriuretic peptide. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1040–46
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Lindsay J,
    2. Apple S,
    3. Pinnow EE,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous coronary intervention-associated nephropathy foreshadows increased risk of late adverse events in patients with normal baseline serum creatinine. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:338–43
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Marenzi G,
    2. Assanelli E,
    3. Campodonico J,
    4. et al
    . Contrast volume during primary percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent contrast-induced nephropathy and mortality. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:170–77
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 3
1 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prolonged Carotid Sinus Reflex Is a Risk Factor for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy following Carotid Artery Stenting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Kato, H. Sakai, M. Tsujimoto, Y. Nishimura
Prolonged Carotid Sinus Reflex Is a Risk Factor for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy following Carotid Artery Stenting
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2011, 32 (3) 441-445; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2344

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Prolonged Carotid Sinus Reflex Is a Risk Factor for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy following Carotid Artery Stenting
T. Kato, H. Sakai, M. Tsujimoto, Y. Nishimura
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2011, 32 (3) 441-445; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2344
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cilostazol Prevents Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in Patients with Contralateral Carotid Artery Stenting
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Safety of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Various Doses
  • Impact of Kidney Function on CNS Gadolinium Deposition in Patients Receiving Repeated Doses of Gadobutrol
  • Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Radiologic Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Setting
Show more Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire