Patient-Specific Computational Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms from 3D Rotational Angiography and CT Angiography: An In Vivo Reproducibility Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Frosen J,
   2. Piippo A,
   3. Paetau A,
   4. et al

   . Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 2004;35:2287–93

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Gonzalez CF,
   2. Cho YI,
   3. Ortega HV,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: flow analysis of their origin and progression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:181–88

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Hashimoto T,
   2. Meng H,
   3. Young WL

   . Intracranial aneurysms: links among inflammation, hemodynamics and vascular remodeling. Neurol Res 2006;28:372–80

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Kayembe KN,
   2. Sasahara M,
   3. Hazama F

   . Cerebral aneurysms and variations in the circle of Willis. Stroke 1984;15:846–50

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Castro MA,
   2. Putman CM,
   3. Sheridan MJ,
   4. et al

   . Hemodynamic patterns of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a possible association with rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:297–302

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Castro MA,
   3. Burgess JE,
   4. et al

   . Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Hendrickson S,
   3. Putman CM

   . Hemodynamics in a lethal basilar artery aneurysm just before its rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:95–98

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Jou LD,
   2. Lee DH,
   3. Morsi H,
   4. et al

   . Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1761–67

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Castro M,
   2. Putman C,
   3. Radaelli A,
   4. et al

   . Hemodynamics and rupture of terminal cerebral aneurysms. Acad Radiol 2009;16:1201–07

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Lohner R

    . Efficient simulation of blood flow past complex endovascular devices using an adaptive embedding technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:468–76

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Cha KS,
    2. Balaras E,
    3. Lieber BB,
    4. et al

    . Modeling the interaction of coils with the local blood flow after coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:873–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Kakalis NM,
    2. Mitsos AP,
    3. Byrne JV,
    4. et al

    . The haemodynamics of endovascular aneurysm treatment: a computational modelling approach for estimating the influence of multiple coil deployment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008;27:814–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Meng H,
    4. et al

    . Quantification of hemodynamic changes induced by virtual placement of multiple stents across a wide-necked basilar trunk aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2007;61:1305–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Larrabide I,
    2. Radaelli A,
    3. Frangi AF

    . Fast virtual stenting with deformable meshes: application to intracranial aneurysms. In: Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, New York. September 6–10, 2008:790–97
15. 15.↵
    1. Liou TM,
    2. Li YC

    . Effects of stent porosity on hemodynamics in a sidewall aneurysm model. J Biomech 2008;41:1174–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Radaelli AG,
    2. Augsburger L,
    3. Cebral JR,
    4. et al

    . Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model: a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007. J Biomech 2008;41:2069–81. Epub 2008 Jun 25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Anxionnat R,
    2. Bracard S,
    3. Ducrocq X,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;218:799–808

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Sugahara T,
    2. Korogi Y,
    3. Nakashima K,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1545–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Wardlaw JM,
    3. Easton V

    . Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? A systematic review. Radiology 2000;217:361–70

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Hernandez M,
    2. Frangi AF

    . Non-parametric geodesic active regions: method and evaluation for cerebral aneurysms segmentation in 3DRA and CTA. Med Image Anal 2007;11:224–41. Epub 2007 Feb 25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Gailloud P,
    3. Bidaut L,
    4. et al

    . CT angiography, MR angiography and rotational digital subtraction angiography for volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms: an experimental study. Neuroradiology 2003;45:404–09

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Tanoue S,
    2. Kiyosue H,
    3. Kenai H,
    4. et al

    . Three-dimensional reconstructed images after rotational angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: surgical correlation. Neurosurgery 2000;47:866–71

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. van Rooij WJ,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. de Gast AN,
    4. et al

    . 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:976–79

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Joseph GJ,
    3. Dion JE

    . Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317–20

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Taylor SM,
    3. TerBrugge K,
    4. et al

    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Brisman JL,
    2. Song JK,
    3. Newell DW

    . Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006;355:928–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Appanaboyina S,
    4. et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Thomas JB,
    2. Milner JS,
    3. Rutt BK,
    4. et al

    . Reproducibility of image-based computational fluid dynamics models of the human carotid bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:132–41

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Romijn M,
    2. Gratama van Andel HA,
    3. van Walderveen MA,
    4. et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:134–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Attene M,
    2. Falcidieno B

    . ReMESH: an interactive environment to edit and repair triangle meshes. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications, Matsushima, Japan. June 14–16, 2006:271–76
31. 31.↵
    1. Reneman RS,
    2. Arts T,
    3. Hoeks AP

    . Wall shear stress, an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure, in the arterial system in vivo: discrepancies with theory. J Vasc Res 2006;43:251–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Ku DN,
    2. Giddens DP,
    3. Zarins CK,
    4. et al

    . Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation: positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985;5:293–302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Brennan RL,
    2. Prediger DJ

    . Coefficient kappa: some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educ and Psychol Meas 1981;41:687–99

    CrossRef
34. 34.↵
    1. Jou LD,
    2. Mohamed A,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. et al

    . 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography may underestimate intracranial aneurysms: findings from two basilar aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1690–92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Bowker TJ,
    2. Watton PN,
    3. Summers PE,
    4. et al

    . Rest versus exercise hemodynamics for middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a computational study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:317–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Dempere-Marco L,
    2. Oubel E,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. et al

    . CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms. In: Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Copenhagen, Denmark. October 1–6, 2006:438–45
37. 37.↵
    1. Castro MA,
    2. Putman CM,
    3. Cebral JR

    . Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1703–09

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Venugopal P,
    2. Valentino D,
    3. Schmitt H,
    4. et al

    . Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1051–60

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Wasserman BA,
    3. Lakatta EG,
    4. et al

    . Carotid bifurcation hemodynamics in older adults: effect of measured versus assumed flow waveform. J Biomech Eng 2010;132:071006

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Jiang JF,
    2. Strother C

    . Computational fluid dynamics simulations of intracranial aneurysms at varying heart rates: a “patient-specific” study. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:091001

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Wasserman BA,
    3. Xie YJ,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms at the carotid bifurcations of older adults. Physiol Meas 2010;31:291–302

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Lell MM,
    2. Anders K,
    3. Uder M,
    4. et al

    . New techniques in CT angiography. Radiographics 2006;26:S45–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. McKinney AM,
    2. Palmer CS,
    3. Truwit CL,
    4. et al

    . Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:594–602

    Abstract/FREE Full Text