Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Secondary Intracranial Hypertension

A.C. Rohr, C. Riedel, M.-C. Fruehauf, A. van Baalen, T. Bartsch, J. Hedderich, K. Alfke, L. Doerner and O. Jansen
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2011, 32 (6) 1021-1029; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2463
A.C. Rohr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Riedel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.-C. Fruehauf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. van Baalen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Bartsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Hedderich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Alfke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Doerner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Jansen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A 15-year-old boy with double vision and reduced acuity has bilateral papilledema. A, On axial T2WI, ventriculomegaly with periventricular CSF flow (black arrows) due to an obstructing tumor within the fourth ventricle is found. Optic nerve sheath hydrops, elongation of the optic nerve (white arrows in A), and optic papilla protrusion are seen (black arrowhead). B, Anteroposterior view of MIP of MRV depicts bilateral narrowings of the lateral RTS and LTS and the sigmoid sinus (arrows). C, On primary axial sections of MRV, the SOVs are enlarged (arrows, right SOV, 2.8-mm width). Medulloblastoma was found at surgery.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A 30-year-old woman with arterial hypertension and visual disturbances has bilateral papilledema. A, MR imaging of the orbit displays a flattened posterior sclera (arrowheads). B, ONS hydrops is present, and there is edema of the optic nerve as seen on the coronal STIR sequence measured 20 mm behind the globe (white arrows, ONS width of 5.4 mm). C, Slightly oblique MIP of MRV shows lengthy narrowings of the intracranial venous sinuses, especially of the superior sagittal sinus (arrows). Vision returns to normal with successful treatment of hypertension. On follow-up MR imaging 3 months later, ONS width is reduced to 4.8 mm, and the posterior sclera appears normal (not shown). D, The intracranial venous sinuses regain normal caliber, as shown by MRV.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    A 28-year-old woman with venous sinus thrombosis secondary to in vitro fertilization. A, Signal intensity typical for thrombosed blood is seen in the SSS and the RTS on axial T2w (black arrow) but not in the LTS (white arrow). B, There is corresponding signal-intensity loss on MIP of MRV in the RTS and SSS (left oblique view). There is a stenosis in the LTS (white arrow) without evidence of a thrombus. C, ONS hydrops is present (not shown), and the height of the pituitary gland is reduced to 2.5 mm (coronal STIR). D and E, CSF pressure is 40 cm H2O. Six months later, partial recanalization of the RTS and SSS occurs following therapy with low-molecular heparin seen on T2WI (black arrow in D) and on MIPs of MRV (E). The stenosis in the LTS is believed to be the result of IH vanishing (white arrow in E). F, The pituitary height-weight returns to normal (4.5 mm).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Cranial MR imaging of a 7-year-old boy with congenital posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus before (A–D) and 7 days later after (E–H) correction of the distal part of an insufficient ventriculoperitoneal shunt (arrows in A and E). Standard imaging (axial T2WI in A and E; sagittal T2WI and FLAIR in B and F) does not reflect IH, and does not change after therapy. ONS hydrops (arrows in C, width of 6.8 mm measured in a plane 3 mm dorsal to the optic globe; upper normal limit is 6.3 mm) normalizes after therapy (arrows in G, width of 5.9 mm). Oblique views of MIP of MRV (D and H) display signal-intensity losses in the LTS and RTS and the SSS (arrows in D), also normalizing on follow-up (H). Bilateral papilledema resolves.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Clinical characteristics in 36 patients with IH and 36 control subjects

    Patient GroupaOpening CSF Pressure on LP in cm H2O (mean) (range)DemographicsDiagnosis, Clinical Signs, and Symptoms
    Group Size, SexPatient Age (mean) (range)DiagnosisPapilledemaMild VISevere VIHeadacheNausea/VomitingOther Symptoms
    All patients with IH39.8 (24–70)n = 36 F (n = 23)M (n = 13)40.9 yr 2–76 yrMeningeal disease (n = 10), thrombosis or occlusion of venous sinus or the dominant IJV (n = 10), intracranial tumor (n = 8), hydrocephalus (other than caused by tumor, n = 5), other (n = 5), see below, multiple (n = 3)23/35 66%20/36 56%12/36 33%30/36 83%9/36 25%See below
    Patient Subgroup I29.5 (22–38)n = 12 F (n = 7)M (n = 5)41.6 yr 32–66 yrOcclusion of a venous sinus or IJV by meningioma or postoperatively (n = 3), viral meningitis (n= 3), bacterial meningitis (n = 1), venous sinus thrombosis (n = 1), excessive arterial hypertension (n = 1), head trauma with hygromas (n = 1), hydrocephalus (n = 1), minocycline medication (n = 1)7/12 58%7/12 58%3/12 25%12/12 100%4/123 3%Fever, meningism (n = 4), transient aphasia (n = 3), vertigo (n = 2), transient apraxia (n = 1), cough (n = 1), hypacusis (n = 1), tinnitus (n = 1), reduced consciousness (n= 1), paraesthesia (n = 1)
    Patient Subgroup II52 40–70n = 10 F (n = 6)M (n = 4)34.5 yr 2–62 yrThrombosis of venous sinus or IJV (n = 4), hydrocephalus (n = 3), meningiosis (n = 2), neurosarcoid meningitis (n = 1)7/97 8%4/10 40%5/10 50%8/10 80%3/10 30%Vertigo, dysaesthesia (n = 1), tinnitus (n = 1), double vision (n = 1), head enlargement (n = 1), unspecific feeling of illness (n = 1)
    Patient Subgroup IIINot testedbn = 14 F (n = 10)M (n = 4)44.8 yr 9–76 yrMeningioma alone or combined with stenosis or occlusion of a venous sinus (n = 4), venous sinus thrombosis alone or combined with brain abscess or dural metastasis (n = 3), brain tumor with occlusive hydrocephalus (n = 2), meningeosis (n = 2), arterial hypertension, PRES (n = 1), hydrocephalus (n = 1)9/14 64%9/14 64%4/14 29%10/14 71%2/14 14%Double vision (n = 4), paresis (n = 4), reduced consciousness (n = 3), nystagmus (n = 1). vertigo (n = 1), fever (n = 1)
    ControlsNot tested.n = 36 F (n = 23) M (n = 13)39 yr 2–80 yrMostly psychiatricNot tested0/36 0%0/36 0%0/36 0%0/36 0%
    • a Patients with IH (n = 36) were subgrouped into those with CSF pressure <40 cm H2O (n = 12, group I), those with >40 cm H2O (n = 10, group II), and those without direct pressure measurements (n = 14, group III).

    • b In subgroup III, 3 patients were reported to have elevated CSF pressure intraoperatively.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Differences in MRI measurements between 36 patients with IH and 36 controlsa

    Diameter of the ONS (mm)bPituitary Height (mm)SOV Diameter (mm)
    Position 1Position 2Position 3Position 4
    Patients with IH (all, n = 36)Mean7.06.15.45.13.12.3
    SD0.90.91.00.71.60.7
    95% CI6.7–7.35.8–6.45.1–5.74.9–5.32.6–3.62.0–2.5
    ICC0.8320.840.8660.840.8630.389
    Patient subgroup I (n = 12)Mean7.26.25.35.13.22.2
        CSF pressure 22–38 cm H2OSD0.60.71.10.51.00.8
    Patient subgroup II (n = 10)Mean6.75.95.25.12.82.4
        CSF pressure 40–70 cm H2OSD0.60.70.80.71.30.5
    Patient subgroup III (n = 14)Mean7.06.25.75.03.22.2
        No CSF pressure measurementsSD1.21.11.00.82.00.7
    Controls (n = 36)Mean5.84.94.44.15.21.7
    SD0.60.60.50.31.50.5
    95% CI5.6–6.04.7–5.14.3–4.64.0–4.34.7–5.61.5–1.8
    ICC0.760.7280.780.7320.8930.634
    • a Results of all measurements differed significantly between all patients and controls (P < .01) and also between the different patient subgroups (I∼III) and controls (P < .05). No significant differences existed among results of patient subgroups I, II, and III.

    • b ONS diameter was measured 3, 6, 10, and 20 mm behind the globe (positions 1–4).

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    MR imaging signs in 36 patients with IH and 36 control subjectsa

    Patient GroupOpening CSF Pressure on LP in cm H2O (mean) (range)CVOOONS HydropsbReduced Pituitary Height (<2.6 mm)Flattened Posterior ScleraOptic Disc ProtrusionDilated SOV (<2.6 mm in diameter)VentriculomegalyPeriventricular CSF FlowOptic Nerve EdemaOptic Nerve ElongationNo. of Positive MRI Signs (mean) (range)
    All patients39.8Frequency,34/3633/3620/3623/3612/3611/367/365/365/362/364.3 (2–9)
    24–70Sensitivity,94%92%56%64%33%31%19%14%14%6%
    CI 95%,81%–99%76%–98%38%–72%46%–79%19%–91%16%–48%8%–36%5%–29%5%–29%1%–19%
    Specificity,100%89%97%78%100%97%100%100%100%100%
    95% CI,90%–100%73%–96%85%–100%61%–90%90%–100%85%–100%90%–100%90%–100%90%–100%90%–100%
    OR10078844637151813135
    95% CI,47–21,74118–4245–3552–172–6582–1271–3381–2401–240.3–114
    Agreement,c100%100%91.7%63.9%77.8%67%91.7%91.7%69.4%80.6%
    κc110.8880.4840.6750.3380.8520.790.470.533
    Patient29.5Frequency10/1211/124/125/122/124/121/121/120/120/123.3 (2–6)
        subgroup I22–3883%92%33%42%17%33%8%8%0%0%
    Patient52Frequency10/109/107/108/106/103/103/101/103/101/105.1 (3–7)
        subgroup II40–70100%90%70%80%60%30%30%10%30%10%
    PatientN.T.Frequency14/1413/149/1410/144/144/143/143/142/141/144.5 (2–9)
        subgroup III100%93%64%71%29%29%21%21%14%7%
    ControlsN.T.Frequency0/364/3635/368/360/361/360/360/360/360/360.4 (0–1)
    0%11%3%22%0%3%0%0%0%0%
    Agreementc100%78%100%69.4%94.4%94.4%94.4%97.2%97.2%94.4%
    • a Frequency of all MRI signs differed between patients and controls (P< .01). Frequency of the MRI signs “optic disc protrusion” and “optic nerve edema” were more often found in patient group II compared with patient group I (P< .05). Frequencies of all MRI signs did not differ between patient subgroup III and the other patient groups.

    • b ONS hydrops was assumed if the diameter was above normal limits in ≥1 different position. Normal upper limits of ONS diameters were 6.4, 5.8, 5.1, and 4.8 mm in measurement positions 1, 2, 3, and 4 (3, 6, 10, and 20 mm behind the globe).

    • c Results of 3 readers used to determine the interobserver-reliability.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 6
1 Jun 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Secondary Intracranial Hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.C. Rohr, C. Riedel, M.-C. Fruehauf, A. van Baalen, T. Bartsch, J. Hedderich, K. Alfke, L. Doerner, O. Jansen
MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Secondary Intracranial Hypertension
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2011, 32 (6) 1021-1029; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2463

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Secondary Intracranial Hypertension
A.C. Rohr, C. Riedel, M.-C. Fruehauf, A. van Baalen, T. Bartsch, J. Hedderich, K. Alfke, L. Doerner, O. Jansen
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2011, 32 (6) 1021-1029; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2463
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The utility of MRI radiological biomarkers in determining intracranial pressure
  • Brain MRI and Ophthalmic Biomarkers of Intracranial Pressure
  • Empty Sella Is a Sign of Symptomatic Lateral Sinus Stenosis and Not Intracranial Hypertension
  • Management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension - Transorbital ultrasound as discriminator
  • Automated Quantitation of the Posterior Scleral Flattening and Optic Nerve Protrusion by MRI in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
  • Update on the pathophysiology and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire