Effect of Lens-Induced Myopia on Visual Cortex Activity: A Functional MR Imaging Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Miki A,
   2. Haselgrove JC,
   3. Liu GT

   . Functional magnetic resonance imaging and its clinical utility in patients with visual disturbances. Surv Ophtalmol 2002;47:562–79

   CrossRef
2. 2.↵
   1. Kollias SS

   . Investigations of the human visual system using functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI). Eur J Radiol 2004;49:64–75

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Sokol S,
   2. Moskowitz A

   . Effect of retinal blur on the peak latency of the pattern evoked potential. Vision Res 1981;21:1279–86

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Bobak P,
   2. Bodis-Wollner I,
   3. Guillory S

   . The effect of blur and contrast on VEP latency: comparison between check and sinusodial grating patterns. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;68:247–55

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Berman MS,
   2. Seki S

   . Blur-induced changes in the visual evoked potential. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982;59:556–60

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Bartel PR,
   2. Vos A

   . Induced refractive errors and pattern electroretinograms and pattern visual evoked potentials: implications for clinical assessments. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;92:78–81

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Richter HO,
   2. Lee JT,
   3. Pardo JV

   . Neuroanatomical correlates of the near response: voluntary modulation of accommodation/vergence in the human visual system. Eur J Neurosci 2000;12:311–21

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Elbel GK,
   2. Kaufman C,
   3. Scheaefers S,
   4. et al

   . Refractive anomalies and visual activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): a versatile and low-cost MR-compatible device to correct a potential confound. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:101–07

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Mirzajani A,
   2. Riyahi-Alam N,
   3. Oghabian MA,
   4. et al

   . Spatial frequency modulates visual cortical response to temporal frequency variation of visual stimuli: an fMRI study. Physiol Meas 2007;28:547–54

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Woolrich MW,
    4. et al

    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23 (suppl 1):208–19

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Woolrich MW,
    2. Jbabdi S,
    3. Patenaude B,
    4. et al

    . Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 2009;45 (suppl 1):73–68

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister PR,
    3. Brady JM,
    4. et al

    . Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Forman SD,
    2. Cohen JD,
    3. Fitzgerald M,
    4. et al

    . Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster size threshold. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:636–47

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Worsley KJ,
    2. Evans AC,
    3. Marrett S,
    4. et al

    . A three dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992;12:900–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Mon-Williams M,
    2. Tresilian JR,
    3. Strang NC,
    4. et al

    . Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus. Proc R Soc Lond 1998;265:71–77

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Johnson CA,
    2. Casson EJ

    . Effects of luminance, contrast, and blur on visual acuity. Optometry Vision Sci 1995;72:864–69

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Webster MA,
    2. Georgeson MA,
    3. Webster SM

    . Neural adjustments to image blur. Nat Neurosci 2002;5:839–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Georgeson MA,
    2. Sullivan GD

    . Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision spatial frequency channels. J Physiol 1975;252:627–56

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Kevin W,
    2. Doug W,
    3. Matthias S,
    4. et al

    . Correspondence of visual evoked potentials with fMRI signals in human visual cortex. Brain Topogr 2008;21:86–92

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Russo FD,
    2. Pitzalis S,
    3. Spitoni G,
    4. et al

    . Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP. Neuroimage 2005;24:874–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science