Quality Control in Neuroradiology: Discrepancies in Image Interpretation among Academic Neuroradiologists

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Turner DA

   . Observer variability: what to do until perfect diagnostic tests are invented. J Nucl Med 1978;19:435–37

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Berlin L

   . Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:517–22

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Borgstede JP,
   2. Lewis RS,
   3. Bhargavan M,
   4. et al

   . RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:59–65

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Garland LH

   . On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology 1949;52:309–28

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Garland LH

   . Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1959;82:25–38

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Berlin L

   . Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1173–78

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Herman PG,
   2. Gerson DE,
   3. Hessel SJ,
   4. et al

   . Disagreements in chest roentgen interpretation. Chest 1975;68:278–82

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Austin JH,
   2. Romney BM,
   3. Goldsmith LS

   . Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1992;182:115–22

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Janjua KJ,
   2. Sugrue M,
   3. Deane SA

   . Prospective evaluation of early missed injuries and the role of tertiary trauma survey. J Trauma 1998;44:1000–06, discussion 1006–07

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Anderson RE,
    2. Hill RB,
    3. Key CR

    . The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades: toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. JAMA 1989;261:1610–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Roosen J,
    2. Frans E,
    3. Wilmer A,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:562–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Siegle RL,
    2. Baram EM,
    3. Reuter SR,
    4. et al

    . Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals. Acad Radiol 1998;5:148–54

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Robinson PJ,
    2. Wilson D,
    3. Coral A,
    4. et al

    . Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs. Br J Radiol 1999;72:323–30

    Abstract
14. 14.↵
    1. Soffa DJ,
    2. Lewis RS,
    3. Sunshine JH,
    4. et al

    . Disagreement in interpretation: a method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:212–17

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Zan E,
    2. Yousem DM,
    3. Carone M,
    4. et al

    . Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 2010;255:135–41

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Filippi CG,
    2. Schneider B,
    3. Burbank HN,
    4. et al

    . Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies. Radiology 2008;249:972–79

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Wong WS,
    2. Roubal I,
    3. Jackson DB,
    4. et al

    . Outsourced teleradiology imaging services: an analysis of discordant interpretation in 124,870 cases. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2:478–84

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Oestmann JW,
    2. Greene R,
    3. Kushner DC,
    4. et al

    . Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection. Radiology 1988;166:451–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Berlin L

    . Comparing new radiographs with those obtained previously. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:3–6

    PubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Loy CT,
    2. Irwig L

    . Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 2004;292:1602–09

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Samuel S,
    2. Kundel HL,
    3. Nodine CF,
    4. et al

    . Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. Radiology 1995;194:895–902

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Berbaum KS,
    2. Franken EA Jr.,
    3. Dorfman DD,
    4. et al

    . Role of faulty visual search in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Acad Radiol 1998;5:9–19

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Eng J,
    2. Mysko WK,
    3. Weller GE,
    4. et al

    . Interpretation of emergency department radiographs: a comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1233–38

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Erly WK,
    2. Ashdown BC,
    3. Lucio RW 2nd.,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of emergency CT scans of the head: is there a community standard? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1727–30

    PubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Dudley RA,
    2. Hricak H,
    3. Scheidler J,
    4. et al

    . Shared patient analysis: a method to assess the clinical benefits of patient referrals. Med Care 2001;39:1182–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Sickles EA,
    2. Wolverton DE,
    3. Dee KE

    . Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 2002;224:861–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Branstetter BF 4th.,
    2. Morgan MB,
    3. Nesbit CE,
    4. et al

    . Preliminary reports in the emergency department: is a subspecialist radiologist more accurate than a radiology resident? Acad Radiol 2007;14:201–06

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. McCarron MO,
    2. Sands C,
    3. McCarron P

    . Quality assurance of neuroradiology in a district general hospital. QJM 2006;99:171–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Lilford RJ,
    2. Brown CA,
    3. Nicholl J

    . Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. BMJ 2007;335:648–50

    FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Hayward RA

    . Performance measurement in search of a path. N Engl J Med 2007;356:951–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Lindenauer PK,
    2. Remus D,
    3. Roman S,
    4. et al

    . Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med 2007;356:486–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Harvey JA,
    2. Fajardo LL,
    3. Innis CA

    . Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation—1993 ARRS President's Award. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:1167–72

    PubMedWeb of Science