Effectiveness of Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy in a Model System of Cerebrovascular Occlusion

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Baron JC,
   2. von Kummer R,
   3. del Zoppo GJ.

   . Treatment of acute ischemic stroke: challenging the concept of a rigid and universal time window. Stroke 1995;26:2219–21

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Gralla J,
   2. Brekenfeld C,
   3. Arnold M,
   4. et al

   . Acute stroke: present and future of catheter-based interventions. Herz 2008;33:507–17

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Saver JL.

   . Time is brain–quantified. Stroke 2006;37:263–66

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Smith WS,
   2. Sung G,
   3. Saver J,
   4. et al

   . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke 2008;39:1205–12

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009:40:2761–68

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Wakhloo AK,
   2. Gounis MJ.

   . Retrievable closed cell intracranial stent for foreign body and clot removal. Neurosurgery 2008;62:390–93
7. 7.↵
   1. Ansari S,
   2. McConnell DJ,
   3. Azari H,
   4. et al

   . Impact of intracranial self-expanding stents in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: efficacy and limitations. J Neurointerv Surg 2011 Feb 10. [Epub ahead of print]
8. 8.↵
   1. Castano C,
   2. Dorado L,
   3. Guerrero C,
   4. et al

   . Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke 41:1836–40
9. 9.↵
   1. Ariani M,
   2. Fishbein MC,
   3. Chae JS,
   4. et al

   . Dissolution of peripheral arterial thrombi by ultrasound. Circulation 1991;84:1680–88

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Goldberg SN,
    2. Ahmed M,
    3. Weinstein J,
    4. et al

    . Low-power transverse ultrasonic treatment of portal vein thrombosis in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:915–21

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Chueh JY,
    2. Wakhloo AK,
    3. Gounis MJ.

    . Neurovascular modeling: small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1159–64

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Chueh JY,
    2. Wakhloo AK,
    3. Hendricks GH,
    4. et al

    . Mechanical characterization of thromboemboli in acute ischemic stroke and laboratory embolus analogs. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1237–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Hirata K,
    2. Yaginuma T,
    3. O'Rourke MF,
    4. et al

    . Age-related changes in carotid artery flow and pressure pulses: possible implications for cerebral microvascular disease. Stroke 2006;37:2552–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Blankensteijn JD,
    2. van der Grond J,
    3. Mali WP,
    4. et al

    . Flow volume changes in the major cerebral arteries before and after carotid endarterectomy: an MR angiography study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;14:446–50

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Grimm J,
    2. Jahnke T,
    3. Muhle C,
    4. et al

    . Influence of thrombus age on the mechanical thrombectomy efficacy of the amplatz thrombectomy device in vitro. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2003;26:265–68

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Krueger K,
    2. Deissler P,
    3. Coburger S,
    4. et al

    . How thrombus model impacts the in vitro study of interventional thrombectomy procedures. Invest Radiol 2004;39:641–48

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Muller-Hulsbeck S,
    2. Grimm J,
    3. Leidt J,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of in vitro effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:1185–91

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Salazar GM,
    2. Faintuch S,
    3. Gladstone SR,
    4. et al

    . In vitro analysis of downstream particulates with mechanical thrombectomy devices: comparison of 20-kHz sonothrombolytic and rotating dispersion wire systems. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:634–39

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Marder VJ,
    2. Chute DJ,
    3. Starkman S,
    4. et al

    . Analysis of thrombi retrieved from cerebral arteries of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2086–93

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Asakura F,
    2. Yilmaz H,
    3. Abdo G,
    4. et al

    . Preclinical testing of a new clot-retrieving wire device using polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel vascular models. Neuroradiology 2007;49:243–51

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Sanossian N,
    3. Yong WH,
    4. et al

    . CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke. Stroke 2011;42:1237–43

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Hong AS,
    2. Chae JS,
    3. Dubin SB,
    4. et al

    . Ultrasonic clot disruption: an in vitro study. Am Heart J 1990;120:418–22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Coggia M,
    2. Goeau-Brissonniere O,
    3. Duval JL,
    4. et al

    . Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty: an experimental study. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:550–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Rapp JH,
    2. Pan XM,
    3. Yu B,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral ischemia and infarction from atheroemboli <100 microm in size. Stroke 2003;34:1976–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Mehra M,
    2. Henninger N,
    3. Hirsch JA,
    4. et al

    . Preclinical acute ischemic stroke modeling. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:307–13

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Jahan R,
    3. Levy EI,
    4. et al

    . Preliminary results of the SOLITAIRE with the intention for thrombectomy (SWIFT) multicenter, randomized clinical trial. International Stroke Conference, February 3, 2012, New Orleans, Louisiana