Analysis of the Influence of 4D MR Angiography Temporal Resolution on Time-to-Peak Estimation Error for Different Cerebral Vessel Structures

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Zierler K

   . Indicator dilution methods for measuring blood flow, volume, and other properties of biological systems: a brief history and memoir. Ann Biomed Eng 2000; 28: 836– 48

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Ostergaard L,
   2. Weisskoff RM,
   3. Chesler DA,
   4. et al

   . High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Res Med 1996; 36: 715– 25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Johnson G,
   2. Wetzel SG,
   3. Cha S,
   4. et al

   . Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, T(2)*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Res Med 2004; 51: 961– 68

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Mischi M,
   2. den Boer JA,
   3. Korsten HH

   . On the physical and stochastic representation of an indicator dilution curve as a gamma variate. Physiol Meas 2008; 29: 281– 94

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Aarnoudse W,
   2. Van't Veer M,
   3. Pijls NH,
   4. et al

   . Direct volumetric blood flow measurement in coronary arteries by thermodilution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 2294– 304

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Keller E,
   2. Nadler A,
   3. Alkadhi H,
   4. et al

   . Noninvasive measurement of regional cerebral blood flow and regional cerebral blood volume by near-infrared spectroscopy and indocyanine green dye dilution. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 828– 39

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Lin M,
   2. Marshall CT,
   3. Qi Y,
   4. et al

   . Quantitative blood flow measurements in the small animal cardiopulmonary system using digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys 2009; 36: 5347– 58

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Fink C,
   2. Ley S,
   3. Kroeker R,
   4. et al

   . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 40– 48

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Benner T,
   2. Heiland S,
   3. Erb G,
   4. et al

   . Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise. Magnetic Reson Imaging 1997; 15: 307– 17

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Thompson HK Jr.,
    2. Starmer CF,
    3. Whalen RE,
    4. et al

    . Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Circ Res 1964; 14: 502– 15

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Lu D,
    2. Monahan WG

    . Effect of sample numbers on the kinetic data analysis of MR contrast agents. Magnetic Res Med 1993; 30: 131– 34

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Forkert ND,
    2. Fiehler J,
    3. Ries T,
    4. et al

    . Reference-based linear curve fitting for bolus arrival time estimation in 4D MRA and MR perfusion-weighted image sequences. Magnetic Res Med 2011; 65: 289– 94

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Shpilfoygel SD,
    2. Close RA,
    3. Valentino DJ,
    4. et al

    . X-ray videodensitometric methods for blood flow and velocity measurement: a critical review of literature. Med Phys 2000; 27: 2008– 23

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Zou Z,
    2. Ma L,
    3. Cheng L,
    4. et al

    . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 692– 99

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Forkert ND,
    2. Saring D,
    3. Handels H

    . Automatic analysis of the anatomy of arteriovenous malformations using 3D and 4D MRA image sequences. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160: 1268– 72

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Fiehler J,
    2. Illies T,
    3. Piening M,
    4. et al

    . Territorial and microvascular perfusion impairment in brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 356– 61

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Barfett JJ,
    2. Fierstra J,
    3. Mikulis DJ,
    4. et al

    . Blood velocity calculated from volumetric dynamic computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol 2010; 45: 778– 81

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Taschner CA,
    2. Le Thuc V,
    3. Reyns N,
    4. et al

    . Gamma knife surgery for arteriovenous malformations in the brain: integration of time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography into dosimetry planning: technical note. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 854– 59

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Säring D,
    2. Forkert ND,
    3. Illies T,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of methods for bolus arrival time determination using a four-dimensional MRA flow phantom. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160: 1263– 67

    PubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Heiland S,
    2. Erb G,
    3. Ziegler S,
    4. et al

    . Where contrast agent concentration really matters—a comparison of CT and MRI. Invest Radiol 2010; 45: 529– 37

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Fink C,
    2. Puderbach M,
    3. Ley S,
    4. et al

    . Intraindividual comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine for time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the upper torso. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 286– 90

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Fink C,
    2. Puderbach M,
    3. Ley S,
    4. et al

    . Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional pulmonary perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M Gd-DTPA at three dose levels. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 143– 48

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Kopka L,
    2. Vosshenrich R,
    3. Rodenwaldt J,
    4. et al

    . Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 345– 48

    PubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Deegan BM,
    2. Devine ER,
    3. Geraghty MC,
    4. et al

    . The relationship between cardiac output and dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans. J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 1424– 31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Clark JM,
    2. Skolnick BE,
    3. Gelfand R,
    4. et al

    . Relationship of 133Xe cerebral blood flow to middle cerebral arterial flow velocity in men at rest. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 1255– 62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Lepori D,
    3. Cotting J,
    4. et al

    . Brain perfusion in children: evolution with age assessed by quantitative perfusion computed tomography. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1642– 52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text