Clinical Standardized fMRI Reveals Altered Language Lateralization in Patients with Brain Tumor

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ojemann G,
   2. Ojemann J,
   3. Lettich E,
   4. et al

   . Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. J Neurosurg 1989;71:316–26

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Dym RJ,
   2. Burns J,
   3. Freeman K,
   4. et al

   . Is functional MR imaging assessment of hemispheric language dominance as good as the Wada test? A meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;261:446–55

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Springer JA,
   2. Binder JR,
   3. Hammeke TA,
   4. et al

   . Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain 1999;122:2033–46

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Gartus A,
   2. Foki T,
   3. Geissler A,
   4. et al

   . Improvement of clinical language localization with an overt semantic and syntactic language functional MR imaging paradigm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1977–85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Binder JR,
   2. Swanson SJ,
   3. Hammeke TA,
   4. et al

   . Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 1996;46:978–84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Desmond JE,
   2. Sum JM,
   3. Wagner AD,
   4. et al

   . Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients. Brain 1995;118:1411–19

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Rutten GJ,
   2. van Rijen PC,
   3. van Veelen CW,
   4. et al

   . Language area localization with three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging matches intrasulcal electrostimulation in Broca's area. Ann Neurol 1999;46:405–08

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. FitzGerald DB,
   2. Cosgrove GR,
   3. Ronner S,
   4. et al

   . Location of language in the cortex: a comparison between functional MR imaging and electrocortical stimulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1529–39

   Abstract
9. 9.↵
   1. Cousin E,
   2. Baciu M,
   3. Pichat C,
   4. et al

   . Functional MRI evidence for language plasticity in adult epileptic patients: preliminary results. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008;4:235–46

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Mbwana J,
    2. Berl MM,
    3. Ritzl EK,
    4. et al

    . Limitations to plasticity of language network reorganization in localization related epilepsy. Brain 2009;132:347–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Rosenberger LR,
    2. Zeck J,
    3. Berl MM,
    4. et al

    . Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric language reorganization in complex partial epilepsy. Neurology 2009;72:1830–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Cao Y,
    2. Vikingstad EM,
    3. George KP,
    4. et al

    . Cortical language activation in stroke patients recovering from aphasia with functional MRI. Stroke 1999;30:2331–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Rosen HJ,
    2. Petersen SE,
    3. Linenweber MR,
    4. et al

    . Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex. Neurology 2000;55:1883–94

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Saur D,
    2. Lange R,
    3. Baumgaertner A,
    4. et al

    . Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006;129:1371–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Heiss WD

    . WSO Leadership in Stroke Medicine Award Lecture Vienna, September 26, 2008: functional imaging correlates to disturbance and recovery of language function. Int J Stroke 2009;4:129–36

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Hess G,
    2. Donoghue JP

    . Long-term depression of horizontal connections in rat motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 1996;8:658–65

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Hess G,
    2. Aizenman CD,
    3. Donoghue JP

    . Conditions for the induction of long-term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:1765–78

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Fandino J,
    2. Kollias SS,
    3. Wieser HG,
    4. et al

    . Intraoperative validation of functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical reorganization patterns in patients with brain tumors involving the primary motor cortex. J Neurosurg 1999;91:238–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Seitz RJ,
    2. Huang Y,
    3. Knorr U,
    4. et al

    . Large-scale plasticity of the human motor cortex. Neuroreport 1995;6:742–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Atlas SW,
    2. Howard RS 2nd.,
    3. Maldjian J,
    4. et al

    . Functional magnetic resonance imaging of regional brain activity in patients with intracerebral gliomas: findings and implications for clinical management. Neurosurgery 1996;38:329–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Mueller WM,
    2. Yetkin FZ,
    3. Hammeke TA,
    4. et al

    . Functional magnetic resonance imaging mapping of the motor cortex in patients with cerebral tumors. Neurosurgery 1996;39:515–20discussion 520–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Capelle L,
    3. Denvil D,
    4. et al

    . Functional recovery after surgical resection of low grade gliomas in eloquent brain: hypothesis of brain compensation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:901–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Denvil D,
    3. Capelle L

    . Long term reshaping of language, sensory, and motor maps after glioma resection: a new parameter to integrate in the surgical strategy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:511–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Desmurget M,
    2. Bonnetblanc F,
    3. Duffau H

    . Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. Brain 2007;130:898–914

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Stippich C,
    2. Rapps N,
    3. Dreyhaupt J,
    4. et al

    . Localizing and lateralizing language in patients with brain tumors: feasibility of routine preoperative functional MR imaging in 81 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:828–36

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Fernandez B,
    2. Cardebat D,
    3. Demonet JF,
    4. et al

    . Functional MRI follow-up study of language processes in healthy subjects and during recovery in a case of aphasia. Stroke 2004;35:2171–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Weber B,
    2. Wellmer J,
    3. Schur S,
    4. et al

    . Presurgical language fMRI in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: effects of task performance. Epilepsia 2006;47:880–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Niskanen E,
    2. Kononen M,
    3. Villberg V,
    4. et al

    . The effect of fMRI task combinations on determining the hemispheric dominance of language functions. Neuroradiology 2012;54:393–405

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Stippich C,
    2. Mohammed J,
    3. Kress B,
    4. et al

    . Robust localization and lateralization of human language function: an optimized clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Neurosci Lett 2003;346:109–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Annett M

    . A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 1970;61:303–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Partovi S,
    2. Konrad F,
    3. Karimi S,
    4. et al

    . Effects of covert and overt paradigms in clinical language fMRI. Acad Radiol 2012;19:518–25

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Konrad F,
    2. Nennig E,
    3. Ochmann H,
    4. et al

    . [Does the individual adaptation of standardized speech paradigms for clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) affect the localization of the language-dominant hemisphere and of Broca's and Wernicke's areas]. [Article in German] Rofo 2005;177:381–85

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Naidich TP,
    2. Valavanis AG,
    3. Kubik S

    . Anatomic relationships along the low-middle convexity: part I–normal specimens and magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 1995;36:517–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Naidich TP,
    2. Hof PR,
    3. Gannon PJ,
    4. et al

    . Anatomic substrates of language: emphasizing speech. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2001;11:305–41, ix

    PubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Szaflarski JP,
    2. Binder JR,
    3. Possing ET,
    4. et al

    . Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data. Neurology 2002;59:238–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Bauchet L,
    3. Lehericy S,
    4. et al

    . Functional compensation of the left dominant insula for language. Neuroreport 2001;12:2159–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Pillai JJ

    . Insights into adult postlesional language cortical plasticity provided by cerebral blood oxygen level-dependent functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:990–96

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Weiller C,
    2. Isensee C,
    3. Rijntjes M,
    4. et al

    . Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study. Ann Neurol 1995;37:723–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Musso M,
    2. Weiller C,
    3. Kiebel S,
    4. et al

    . Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain 1999;122:1781–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Thiel A,
    2. Herholz K,
    3. Koyuncu A,
    4. et al

    . Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: a positron emission tomography activation study. Ann Neurol 2001;50:620–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Woermann FG,
    2. Jokeit H,
    3. Luerding R,
    4. et al

    . Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy. Neurology 2003;61:699–701

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Pouratian N,
    2. Bookheimer SY,
    3. Rex DE,
    4. et al

    . Utility of preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging for identifying language cortices in patients with vascular malformations. J Neurosurg 2002;97:21–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Yetkin FZ,
    2. Mueller WM,
    3. Morris GL,
    4. et al

    . Functional MR activation correlated with intraoperative cortical mapping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1311–15

    Abstract
44. 44.↵
    1. Yetkin FZ,
    2. Swanson S,
    3. Fischer M,
    4. et al

    . Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1095–98

    Abstract
45. 45.↵
    1. Mahdavi A,
    2. Houshmand S,
    3. Oghabian MA,
    4. et al

    . Developing optimized fMRI protocol for clinical use: comparison of different language paradigms. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:413–19

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Gutbrod K,
    2. Spring D,
    3. Degonda N,
    4. et al

    . Determination of language dominance: Wada test and fMRI compared using a novel sentence task. J Neuroimaging 2012;22:266–74

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Smits M,
    2. Visch-Brink E,
    3. Schraa-Tam CK,
    4. et al

    . Functional MR imaging of language processing: an overview of easy-to-implement paradigms for patient care and clinical research. Radiographics 2006;26:S145–58

    CrossRef
48. 48.↵
    1. Barch DM,
    2. Sabb FW,
    3. Carter CS,
    4. et al

    . Overt verbal responding during fMRI scanning: empirical investigations of problems and potential solutions. Neuroimage 1999;10:642–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Birn RM,
    2. Bandettini PA,
    3. Cox RW,
    4. et al

    . Event-related fMRI of tasks involving brief motion. Hum Brain Mapp 1999;7:106–14

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Jansen A,
    2. Menke R,
    3. Sommer J,
    4. et al

    . The assessment of hemispheric lateralization in functional MRI–robustness and reproducibility. Neuroimage 2006;33:204–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Spreer J,
    2. Arnold S,
    3. Quiske A,
    4. et al

    . Determination of hemisphere dominance for language: comparison of frontal and temporal fMRI activation with intracarotid amytal testing. Neuroradiology 2002;44:467–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    1. Wu CX,
    2. Pu S,
    3. Lin Y,
    4. et al

    . Fractionated resection on low grade gliomas involving Broca's area and insights to brain plasticity. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:2026–30

    PubMed
53. 53.↵
    1. Tieleman A,
    2. Deblaere K,
    3. Van Roost D,
    4. et al

    . Preoperative fMRI in tumour surgery. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2523–34

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Roth HL

    . Finding language in the matter of the brain: origins of the clinical aphasia examination. Semin Neurol 2002;22:335–48

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    1. Binder JR,
    2. Frost JA,
    3. Hammeke TA,
    4. et al

    . Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1997;17:353–62

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
56. 56.↵
    1. Engström M,
    2. Ragnehed M,
    3. Lundberg P,
    4. et al

    . Paradigm design of sensory-motor and language tests in clinical fMRI. Neurophysiol Clin 2004;34:267–77

    CrossRefPubMed