Follow-Up of Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography at 3T and 1.5T in a Large Prospective Series

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RSC,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1262–63

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Spelle L,
   3. Vitry F,
   4. et al

   . Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497–504

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Ferns SP,
   2. Sprengers MES,
   3. von Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Kaufmann TJ,
   2. Huston J,
   3. Mandrekar JN,
   4. et al

   . Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Boulin A,
   2. Pierot L

   . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001;219:108–13

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Delcourt C,
   3. Bouquigny F,
   4. et al

   . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:744–49

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Kwee TC,
   2. Kwee RM

   . MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2007;49:703–13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Urbach H,
   2. Dorenbeck U,
   3. von Falkenhausen M,
   4. et al

   . Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of ruptured and coiled aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2008;50:383–89

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Anzalone N,
   2. Scomazzoni F,
   3. Cirillo M,
   4. et al

   . Follow-up of coiled aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1530–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Schaafsma JD,
    2. Velthuis BK,
    3. Majoie CBLM,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms treated with coil placement: test characteristics of follow-up MR angiography—multicenter study. Radiology 2010;256:209–18

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Buhk JH,
    2. Kallenberg K,
    3. Mohr A,
    4. et al

    . No advantage of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla compared to 1.5T in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2008;50:855–61

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Ramgren B,
    2. Siemund R,
    3. Cronqvist M,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of 3D inflow MRA at 3T and 1.5T and contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T with DSA. Neuroradiology 2008;50:947–54

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kaufmann TJ,
    2. Huston J,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. et al

    . A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:912–18

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Kovacs A,
    2. Möhlenbruch M,
    3. Hadizadeh DR,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive imaging after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and 64-row multidetector computed tomography: a pilot study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:573–82

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Kaufmann T,
    3. Kallmes DF

    . Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:497–500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Bonafé A,
    3. Bracard S,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix detachable coils: immediate post-treatment results from a prospective multicenter registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1693–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al

    . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RSC,
    3. Birks K,
    4. et al

    . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Sluzewski M,
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Beute GN,
    4. et al

    . Late rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2542–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text