Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHealth Care Reform Vignette

Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program

N. Anumula and P.C. Sanelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2012, 33 (2) 225-226; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2992
N. Anumula
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.C. Sanelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: A brief review of the Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program (HOP QDRP) is presented highlighting the program's legislative history, outpatient imaging efficiency measures and program requirements. Specifically, HOP QDRP measures applicable to imaging practices are discussed. Resources are also provided for further information on the program's requirements and measures.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CMS
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
HOPPS
Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System
HOP QDRP
Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program
OIE
outpatient imaging efficiency
PQRS
Physician Quality Reporting System

What Is the HOP QDRP?

HOP QDRP stands for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program. This program is a pay for quality data reporting program implemented by the CMS for outpatient hospital services. It was instituted by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 20061 and requires hospitals to submit data on measures regarding the quality of care provided in the outpatient setting. Measures of quality include those of process, structure, outcome, and efficiency.

What Is the Purpose of This Program?

The outpatient measures are used to evaluate the consistency with which a health care provider administers the best known available outpatient care for a particular condition. Specifically for radiologists, the goal is to promote high-quality efficient care, reduce unnecessary exposure to contrast materials and/or radiation, and promote adherence to evidence-based medicine practice guidelines.

In addition to providing hospitals with a financial incentive to report their quality of care measure data, the program provides CMS with data to help Medicare beneficiaries make more informed decisions about their health care. Hospital quality of care information gathered through this program is available on the Hospital Compare Web site (www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov).

How Will HOP QDRP Affect Radiology Practice?

Outpatient imaging is a ubiquitous component of health care delivery, with important implications in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of disease. Few national standards exist to address the variations in the delivery of these services, define its quality, or allow its measurement. Thus, the establishment of OIE measures can help define measurable indicators such as appropriate utilization, excellence in technical performance, timeliness in study reporting, and clinical effectiveness to improve the quality of radiology practice at the national level.

How is “Efficiency” Defined?

“Efficiency” can be defined as the absence of waste. The Institute of Medicine has defined “efficiency” as avoiding the use of resources that do not provide any benefit to patients and classifies the use of such resources as “waste.”2 The Research and Development Corporation has defined “clinical waste” as the provision of clinical services for which the cost of the service outweighs the benefit.3

How Does HOP QDRP Differ from Other Incentive Programs?

In this program, hospitals that do not successfully meet the administrative data-collection, submission, validation, and publication requirements will receive a 2% reduction in their annual payment update under the HOPPS. This is different from such programs as the PQRS, which is a voluntary program that offers an incentive payment if the requirements are successfully met. The HOP QDRP is calculated on a per-hospital basis, whereas the PQRS is calculated on a per-physician or group practice basis.

What Criteria Are Used in the Development of HOP QDRP Measures?

To be implemented, measures must meet 4 criteria:

  • 1) Importance and relevance with respect to prevalence, cost burden, and vulnerable populations

  • 2) Scientific soundness—consistent evidence-based clinical guidelines

  • 3) Usability—clear guidelines that highlight room for improvement

  • 4) Feasibility—minimal data-collection requirements

What Measures are Currently Used by CMS in This Program?

CMS is currently using 14 measures in the HOP QDRP. Seven of the measures (OP-8, 9, 10, 11 and OP-13, 14, 15) are OIE measures and are of interest to radiologists. These measures are described in detail below:

  • OP-8: MR Imaging Lumbar Spine for Low Back Pain. This measure calculates the percentage of patients who had an MRI of the lumbar spine with a diagnosis of low back pain without Medicare claims-based evidence of antecedent conservative therapy.

  • OP-9: Mammography Follow-up Rates. This measure calculates the percentage of patients with mammography screening studies done in the outpatient hospital setting that are followed within 45 days by diagnostic mammography or sonography of the breast in an outpatient or office setting.

  • OP-10: Abdomen CT—Use of Contrast Material. This measure calculates the ratio of CT abdomen studies that are performed both with and without contrast of all CT abdomen studies performed (those with contrast, those without contrast, and those with both).

  • OP-11: Thorax CT—Use of Contrast Material. This measure calculates the ratio of CT thorax studies that are performed with and without contrast of all CT thorax studies performed (those with contrast, those without contrast, and those with both).

The following are new measures adopted in 2011:

  • OP-13: Cardiac Imaging for Preoperative Risk Assessment for Non-Cardiac Low-Risk Surgery. This measure calculates the ratio of stress echocardiography, SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, and stress MR imaging studies performed within 30 days of ambulatory low-risk noncardiac surgery of the total number of outpatient studies performed. High values may indicate high use of stress tests before low-risk noncardiac procedures and raise the question of inefficient examination protocols.

  • OP-14: Simultaneous Use of Brain CT and Sinus CT. This measure calculates the percentage of brain CT studies that are simultaneously accompanied by a sinus CT study. High values may indicate high use of simultaneous brain and sinus CT examinations and raise the question of inefficient examination protocols and exposure to additional unnecessary radiation.

  • OP-15: Use of Brain CT in the Emergency Department (ED) for Atraumatic Headache. This measure calculates the percentage of emergency department visits with a coincident brain CT study of all emergency department visits with a primary diagnosis of headache. High values may indicate high use of brain CT in the emergency department for atraumatic headache and raise the question of inefficient examination protocols.

How Are These Measures Categorized?

These OIE measures are classified within 6 domains:

  • 1) Duplication—studies that are duplicated within a short time of each other without any identified clinical indication

  • 2) Overlap—different imaging modalities for the same area of the body within a short time of each other that serve the same clinical purpose

  • 3) Screening—imaging studies without identified clinical indications based on symptoms or existing diagnoses

  • 4) Negative Studies—clinically noncontributory studies

  • 5) With and Without Contrast—imaging studies repeated in a short time frame on same body area differing only in whether contrast is used

  • 6) Adjacent Body Areas—imaging studies repeated in a short time frame on adjacent body areas

What Are the Current Exclusion Criteria?

Exclusion criteria are used to restrict the scope of the OIE measures to clinical circumstances that are guided by evidence-based guidelines and research evidence. The exclusions applied to each measure serve the following purposes:

  • 1) Standardize measures across providers

  • 2) Eliminate cases for which there is expected to be little variation

  • 3) Eliminate cases for which there is little agreement on the correct clinical course

Please refer to the CMS Web site (www.cms.gov) for further details regarding exclusion criteria for each measure.

What Are Minimum Case-Count Requirements?

For public reporting purposes, there must be an adequate number of cases in the denominator of the measure. If a hospital outpatient department performs a small number of imaging studies meeting the specifications of the measure, the observed value may be an unreliable indicator of the true performance of a hospital. Thus, the CMS established minimum case counts for each measure. If a hospital does not meet the minimum case count for public reporting, Hospital Compare will not report the data for the imaging measures. The minimum case-count requirements are different for each measure and apply specifically to each observed percentage value. A more thorough description of minimum case counts can be found by using the following Web site: https://www.cms.gov/HospitalQualityInits/Downloads/HospitalOutpatientImagingEfficiencyMinimumCaseCounts.pdf.

Where Can I Find More Information about These Programs?

More information about the HOP QDRP and the HOPPS can be found at the CMS Web site (www.cms.gov).

References

  1. 1.↵
    Tax Relief and Healthcare Act. Public law No. 109–432, title I, section 109, subsection d (2006).
  2. 2.↵
    Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bentley TG,
    2. Effros RM,
    3. Palar K,
    4. et al
    . Waste in the U.S. health care system: a conceptual framework. Milbank Q 2008; 86: 629– 59
    CrossRefPubMed
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 2
1 Feb 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
N. Anumula, P.C. Sanelli
Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2012, 33 (2) 225-226; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2992

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program
N. Anumula, P.C. Sanelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2012, 33 (2) 225-226; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2992
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Adding Value to Health Care: Where Radiologists May Contribute
  • Accountable Care Organizations: What Radiologists Should Know
  • The Independent Payment Advisory Board
Show more Health Care Reform Vignette

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire