Evaluation of Brain and Head and Neck Tumors with 4D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Gemmete JJ,
   2. Ansari SA,
   3. McHugh J,
   4. et al

   . Embolization of vascular tumors of the head and neck. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2009; 19: 181– 98

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Vogl TJ,
   2. Juergens M,
   3. Balzer JO,
   4. et al

   . Glomus tumors of the skull base: combined use of MR angiography and spin-echo imaging. Radiology 1994; 192: 103– 10

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. van den Berg R,
   2. van Gils AP,
   3. Wasser MN

   . Imaging of head and neck paragangliomas with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1667– 73

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. van den Berg R,
   2. Verbist BM,
   3. Mertens BJ,
   4. et al

   . Head and neck paragangliomas: improved tumor detection using contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography as compared with fat-suppressed MR imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 863– 70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Arnold SM,
   2. Strecker R,
   3. Scheffler K,
   4. et al

   . Dynamic contrast enhancement of paragangliomas of the head and neck: evaluation with time-resolved 2D MR projection angiography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1608– 11

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Michaely HJ,
   2. Herrmann KA,
   3. Dietrich O,
   4. et al

   . Quantitative and qualitative characterization of vascularization and hemodynamics in head and neck tumors with a 3D magnetic resonance time-resolved echo-shared angiographic technique (TREAT): initial results. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1101– 10

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Neves F,
   2. Huwart L,
   3. Jourdan G,
   4. et al

   . Head and neck paragangliomas: value of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 883– 39

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Willinek WA,
   2. Hadizadeh DR,
   3. von Falkenhausen M,
   4. et al

   . 4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 1455– 60

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Parmar H,
   2. Ivancevic MK,
   3. Dudek N,
   4. et al

   . Dynamic MRA with four-dimensional time-resolved angiography using keyhole at 3 Tesla in head and neck vascular lesions. J Neuroophthalmol 2009; 29: 119– 27

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Nishimura S,
    2. Hirai T,
    3. Sasao A,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 80– 85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. van Vaals JJ,
    2. Brummer ME,
    3. Dixon WT,
    4. et al

    . “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 671– 75

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Farb RI,
    2. McGregor C,
    3. Kim JK,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography—initial assessment. Radiology 2001; 220: 244– 51

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Willinek WA,
    2. Gieseke J,
    3. Conrad R,
    4. et al

    . Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002; 225: 583– 88

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Taschner CA,
    2. Gieseke J,
    3. Le Thuc V,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T. Radiology 2008; 246: 871– 79

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Kim JK,
    2. Farb RI,
    3. Wright GA

    . Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206: 283– 89

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Parikh PT,
    2. Sandhu GS,
    3. Blackham KA,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of image quality of a 32-channel versus a 12-channel head coil at 1.5T for MR imaging of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 365– 73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Prudent V,
    2. Kumar A,
    3. Liu S,
    4. et al

    . Human hippocampal subfields in young adults at 7.0 T: feasibility of imaging. Radiology 2010; 254: 900– 06

    CrossRefPubMed