Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular
Open Access

Cilostazol Prevents Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in Patients with Contralateral Carotid Artery Stenting

T. Kato, H. Sakai, T. Takagi and Y. Nishimura
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2012, 33 (7) 1262-1266; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2955
T. Kato
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization, Toyohashi Medical Center, Toyohashi City, Aichi, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Sakai
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization, Toyohashi Medical Center, Toyohashi City, Aichi, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Takagi
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization, Toyohashi Medical Center, Toyohashi City, Aichi, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Nishimura
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization, Toyohashi Medical Center, Toyohashi City, Aichi, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421–28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.
    Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Halliday A,
    2. Mansfield A,
    3. Marro J,
    4. et al
    . Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1491–502
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yadav JS,
    2. Wholey MH,
    3. Kuntz RE,
    4. et al
    . Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493–501
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mas JL,
    2. Chatellier G,
    3. Beyssen B,
    4. et al
    . Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1660–71
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.
    1. Ringleb PA,
    2. Allenberg J,
    3. Bruckmann H,
    4. et al
    . 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2006;368:1239–47
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ederle J,
    2. Dobson J,
    3. Featherstone RL,
    4. et al
    . Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:985–97
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Brott TG,
    2. Hobson RW 2nd.,
    3. Howard G,
    4. et al
    . Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363:11–23
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. AbuRahma AF,
    2. Cook CC,
    3. Metz MJ,
    4. et al
    . Natural history of carotid artery stenosis contralateral to endarterectomy: results from two randomized prospective trials. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:1154–61
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Raman KG,
    2. Layne S,
    3. Makaroun MS,
    4. et al
    . Disease progression in contralateral carotid artery is common after endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:52–57
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ballotta E,
    2. Da Giau G,
    3. Meneghetti G,
    4. et al
    . Progression of atherosclerosis in asymptomatic carotid arteries after contralateral endarterectomy: a 10-year prospective study. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:516–22
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fluri F,
    2. Engelter ST,
    3. Wasner M,
    4. et al
    . The probability of restenosis, contralateral disease progression, and late neurologic events following carotid endarterectomy: a long-term follow-up study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:654–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Chaturvedi S,
    2. Yadav JS
    . The role of antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting for ischemic stroke prevention. Stroke 2006;37:1572–77
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Iida O,
    2. Nanto S,
    3. Uematsu M,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol reduces restenosis after endovascular therapy in patients with femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Surg 2008;48:144–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Ishii H,
    2. Kumada Y,
    3. Toriyama T,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol improves long-term patency after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in hemodialysis patients with peripheral artery disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1034–40
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Soga Y,
    2. Yokoi H,
    3. Kawasaki T,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy of cilostazol after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery disease in patients with intermittent claudication. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:48–53
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Soga Y,
    2. Iida O,
    3. Hirano K,
    4. et al
    . Mid-term clinical outcome and predictors of vessel patency after femoropopliteal stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:608–15
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Suzuki K,
    2. Iida O,
    3. Soga Y,
    4. et al
    . Long-term results of the S.M.A.R.T. Control(TM) stent for superficial femoral artery lesions, J-SMART registry. Circ J 2011;75:939–44
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Douglas JS Jr.,
    2. Holmes DR Jr.,
    3. Kereiakes DJ,
    4. et al
    . Coronary stent restenosis in patients treated with cilostazol. Circulation 2005;112:2826–32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.
    1. Ahn Y,
    2. Jeong MH,
    3. Jeong JW,
    4. et al
    . Randomized comparison of cilostazol vs clopidogrel after drug-eluting stenting in diabetic patients–clilostazol for diabetic patients in drug-eluting stent (CIDES) trial. Circ J 2008;72:35–39
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Biondi-Zoccai GG,
    2. Lotrionte M,
    3. Anselmino M,
    4. et al
    . Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials appraising the impact of cilostazol after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2008;155:1081–89
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.
    1. Lee SW,
    2. Park SW,
    3. Kim YH,
    4. et al
    . Drug-eluting stenting followed by cilostazol treatment reduces late restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus the DECLARE-DIABETES Trial (A Randomized Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic Patients). J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1181–87
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.
    1. Jennings DL,
    2. Kalus JS
    . Addition of cilostazol to aspirin and a thienopyridine for prevention of restenosis after coronary artery stenting: a meta-analysis. J Clin Pharmacol 2010;50:415–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.
    1. Dihu JB,
    2. Abudayyeh I,
    3. Saudye HA,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol: a potential therapeutic option to prevent in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:2035–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lee SW,
    2. Park SW,
    3. Kim YH,
    4. et al
    . A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison study of triple antiplatelet therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation in long coronary lesions: results from the DECLARE-LONG II (Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients with Long Coronary Lesions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1264–70
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Takigawa T,
    2. Matsumaru Y,
    3. Hayakawa M,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol reduces restenosis after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2010;51:51–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Yamagami H,
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Matsumaru Y,
    4. et al
    . Periprocedural cilostazol treatment and restenosis after carotid artery stenting: The Retrospective Study of In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting (ReSISteR-CAS). J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;21:193–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Yoshimoto T,
    2. Fujimoto S,
    3. Muraki M,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol may suppress restenosis and new contralateral carotid artery stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010;50:525–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. Sakai H,
    3. Tsujimoto M,
    4. et al
    . Prolonged carotid sinus reflex is a risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy following carotid artery stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:441–45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jahromi AS,
    2. Cina CS,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:962–72
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Rockman CB,
    2. Riles TS,
    3. Lamparello PJ,
    4. et al
    . Natural history and management of the asymptomatic, moderately stenotic internal carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:423–31
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.
    1. Olin JW,
    2. Fonseca C,
    3. Childs MB,
    4. et al
    . The natural history of asymptomatic moderate internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound. Vasc Med 1998;3:101–08
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Mansour MA,
    2. Littooy FN,
    3. Watson WC,
    4. et al
    . Outcome of moderate carotid artery stenosis in patients who are asymptomatic. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:217–25
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.
    1. Muluk SC,
    2. Muluk VS,
    3. Sugimoto H,
    4. et al
    . Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a natural history study in 1004 patients. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:208–14
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Liapis C,
    2. Kakisis J,
    3. Papavassiliou V,
    4. et al
    . Internal carotid artery stenosis: rate of progression. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:111–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Cinà CS,
    2. Safar HA,
    3. Maggisano R,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence and progression of internal carotid artery stenosis in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:75–82
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Jahromi AS,
    2. Clase CM,
    3. Maggisano R,
    4. et al
    . Progression of internal carotid artery stenosis in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:292–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Libby P
    . Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002;420:868–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. de Weerd M,
    2. Greving JP,
    3. Hedblad B,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke 2010;41:1294–97
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Qureshi AI,
    2. Janardhan V,
    3. Bennett SE,
    4. et al
    . Who should be screened for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis? Experience from the Western New York Stroke Screening Program. J Neuroimaging 2001;11:105–11
    PubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.
    1. Marek J,
    2. Mills JL,
    3. Harvich J,
    4. et al
    . Utility of routine carotid duplex screening in patients who have claudication. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:572–77; discussion 577–79
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.
    1. Fine-Edelstein JS,
    2. Wolf PA,
    3. O'Leary DH,
    4. et al
    . Precursors of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis in the Framingham Study. Neurology 1994;44:1046–50
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. O'Leary DH,
    2. Polak JF,
    3. Kronmal RA,
    4. et al
    . Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke 1992;23:1752–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Bhatt DL,
    2. Eagle KA,
    3. Ohman EM,
    4. et al
    . Comparative determinants of 4-year cardiovascular event rates in stable outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis. JAMA 2010;304:1350–57
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Bhatt DL,
    2. Steg PG,
    3. Ohman EM,
    4. et al
    . International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA 2006;295:180–89
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Nicolaides AN,
    2. Kakkos SK,
    3. Griffin M,
    4. et al
    . Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;30:275–84
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Abbott AL
    . Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 2009;40:e573–83
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Han Y,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Li Y,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol improves long-term outcomes after coronary stent implantation. Am Heart J 2005;150: 568
  50. 50.↵
    1. Lee SW,
    2. Chun KJ,
    3. Park SW,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of triple antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients at high risk of restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation (from the DECLARE-DIABETES and -LONG Trials). Am J Cardiol 2010;105:168–73
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Kwon SU,
    2. Cho YJ,
    3. Koo JS,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol prevents the progression of the symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: the multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cilostazol in symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke 2005;36:782–86
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Shinohara Y,
    2. Katayama Y,
    3. Uchiyama S,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol for prevention of secondary stroke (CSPS 2): an aspirin-controlled, double-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:959–68
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Ikeda Y,
    2. Kikuchi M,
    3. Murakami H,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of the inhibitory effects of cilostazol, acetylsalicylic acid and ticlopidine on platelet functions ex vivo. Randomized, double-blind cross-over study. Drug Research 1987;37:563–66
    PubMed
  54. 54.
    1. Tanaka T,
    2. Ishikawa T,
    3. Hagiwara M,
    4. et al
    . Effects of cilostazol, a selective cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor on the contraction of vascular smooth muscle. Pharmacology 1988;36:313–20
    PubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.
    1. Tanaka K,
    2. Gotoh F,
    3. Fukuuchi Y,
    4. et al
    . Effects of a selective inhibitor of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase on the pial microcirculation in feline cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1989;20:668–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Ishiguro M,
    2. Mishiro K,
    3. Fujiwara Y,
    4. et al
    . Phosphodiesterase-III inhibitor prevents hemorrhagic transformation induced by focal cerebral ischemia in mice treated with tPA. PLoS One 2010;5: e15178
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 7
1 Aug 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cilostazol Prevents Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in Patients with Contralateral Carotid Artery Stenting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Kato, H. Sakai, T. Takagi, Y. Nishimura
Cilostazol Prevents Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in Patients with Contralateral Carotid Artery Stenting
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2012, 33 (7) 1262-1266; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2955

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Cilostazol Prevents Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in Patients with Contralateral Carotid Artery Stenting
T. Kato, H. Sakai, T. Takagi, Y. Nishimura
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2012, 33 (7) 1262-1266; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2955
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cilostazol: The "Poor Man's" Replacement of Drug-Eluting Stents and Balloons?
  • Effect of Cilostazol in Preventing Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Carotid Wallstent: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire