Clinical Assessment of Standard and Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisition Diffusion Imaging: Effects of Reduction Factor and Spatial Resolution

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Moseley ME,
   2. Wendland MF,
   3. Kucharczyk J.

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of diffusion and perfusion. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1991;3:50–67

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Lutsep HL,
   2. Albers GW,
   3. DeCrespigny A,
   4. et al

   . Clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 1997;41:574–80

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lansberg MG,
   2. Thijs VN,
   3. Hamilton S,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of the clinical-diffusion and perfusion-diffusion mismatch models in DEFUSE. Stroke 2007;38:1826–30

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Easton JD,
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Albers GW,
   4. et al.

   , for the American Heart Association American Stroke Association Stroke Council Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council on Cardiovascular Nursing Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009;40:2276–93. Epub 2009 May 7

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Purroy F,
   2. Begue R,
   3. Gil MI,
   4. et al

   . Patterns of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging associated with etiology improve the accuracy of prognosis after transient ischaemic attack. Eur J Neurol 2011;18:121–28

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Moseley ME,
   2. Kucharczyk J,
   3. Mintorovitch J,
   4. et al

   . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute stroke: correlation with T2-weighted and magnetic susceptibility-enhanced MR imaging in cats. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:423–39

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Bammer R,
   2. Keeling SL,
   3. Augustin M,
   4. et al

   . Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001;46:548–54

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Pruessmann KP,
   2. Weiger M,
   3. Scheidegger MB,
   4. et al

   . SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–62

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Griswold MA,
   2. Jakob PM,
   3. Heidemann RM,
   4. et al

   . Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Ra JB,
    2. Rim CY.

    . Fast imaging using subencoding data sets from multiple detectors. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:142–45

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Sodickson DK.

    . Tailored SMASH image reconstructions for robust in vivo parallel MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:243–51

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Skare S,
    2. Newbould RD,
    3. Clayton DB,
    4. et al

    . Clinical multishot DW-EPI through parallel imaging with considerations of susceptibility, motion, and noise. Magn Reson Med 2007;57: 881–90

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Brau AC,
    2. Beatty PJ,
    3. Skare S,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of reconstruction accuracy and efficiency among autocalibrating data-driven parallel imaging methods. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:382–95

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Noll DC,
    2. Nishimura DG,
    3. Macovski A.

    . Homodyne detection in magnetic-resonance-imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:154–163

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Conturo TE,
    2. McKinstry RC,
    3. Akbudak E,
    4. et al

    . Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:399–412

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Kuhl CK,
    2. Gieseke J,
    3. von Falkenhausen M,
    4. et al

    . Sensitivity encoding for diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study. Radiology 2005;234:517–26

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Holdsworth SJ,
    2. Yeom K,
    3. Skare S,
    4. et al

    . Clinical application of readout-segmented-echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1274–79

    Abstract/FREE Full Text