Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Review ArticleReview Articles
Open Access

MR Angiography and Imaging for the Evaluation of Middle Cerebral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease

A.J. Degnan, G. Gallagher, Z. Teng, J. Lu, Q. Liu and J.H. Gillard
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2012, 33 (8) 1427-1435; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2697
A.J. Degnan
aFrom the University Department of Radiology (A.J.D., Z.T., J.H.G.), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Gallagher
bPeterborough and Stamford Hospitals Trust (G.G.), NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z. Teng
aFrom the University Department of Radiology (A.J.D., Z.T., J.H.G.), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Lu
cRadiology Division (J.L., Q.L.), Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Q. Liu
cRadiology Division (J.L., Q.L.), Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.H. Gillard
aFrom the University Department of Radiology (A.J.D., Z.T., J.H.G.), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization. Causes of Death. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_part2.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2011.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sridharan SE,
    2. Unnikrishnan JP,
    3. Sukumaran S,
    4. et al
    . Incidence, types, risk factors, and outcome of stroke in a developing country: the Trivandrum Stroke Registry. Stroke 2009; 40: 1212– 18
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Arenillas JF
    . Intracranial atherosclerosis: current concepts. Stroke 2011; 42 (1 suppl): S20– 23
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lhermitte F,
    2. Gautier JC,
    3. Derouesne C,
    4. et al
    . Ischemic accidents in the middle cerebral artery territory: a study of the causes in 122 cases. Arch Neurol 1968; 19: 248– 56
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Suwanwela NC,
    2. Chutinetr A
    . Risk factors for atherosclerosis of cervicocerebral arteries: intracranial versus extracranial. Neuroepidemiology 2003; 22: 37– 40
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wardlaw JM,
    2. Doubal FN,
    3. Eadie E,
    4. et al
    . Little association between intracranial arterial stenosis and lacunar stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011; 31: 12– 18
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Klein IF,
    2. Labreuche J,
    3. Lavallee PC,
    4. et al
    . Is moderate atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery a cause of or a coincidental finding in ischemic stroke? Cerebrovasc Dis 2010; 29: 140– 45
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mazighi M,
    2. Labreuche J,
    3. Gongora-Rivera F,
    4. et al
    . Autopsy prevalence of intracranial atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke. Stroke 2008; 39: 1142– 47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wong LK
    . Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke 2006; 1: 158– 59
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mead GE,
    2. Lewis SC,
    3. Wardlaw JM,
    4. et al
    . Severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis and middle cerebral artery disease in lacunar ischaemic stroke: innocent bystanders? J Neurol 2002; 249: 266– 71
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rajapakse A,
    2. Rajapakse S,
    3. Sharma JC
    . Is investigating for carotid artery disease warranted in non-cortical lacunar infarction? Stroke 2011; 42: 217– 20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lyrer PA,
    2. Engelter S,
    3. Radu EW,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral infarcts related to isolated middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke 1997; 28: 1022– 27
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bang OY,
    2. Heo JH,
    3. Kim JY,
    4. et al
    . Middle cerebral artery stenosis is a major clinical determinant in striatocapsular small, deep infarction. Arch Neurol 2002; 59: 259– 63
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Adams HP Jr.,
    2. Bendixen BH,
    3. Kappelle LJ,
    4. et al
    . Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial—TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993; 24: 35– 41
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gongora-Rivera F,
    2. Labreuche J,
    3. Jaramillo A,
    4. et al
    . Autopsy prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 1203– 10
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lee PH,
    2. Oh SH,
    3. Bang OY,
    4. et al
    . Isolated middle cerebral artery disease: clinical and neuroradiological features depending on the pathogenesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 727– 32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Chen XY,
    2. Wong KS,
    3. Lam WW,
    4. et al
    . Middle cerebral artery atherosclerosis: histological comparison between plaques associated with and not associated with infarct in a postmortem study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 74– 80
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lee PH,
    2. Oh SH,
    3. Bang OY,
    4. et al
    . Infarct patterns in atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery versus internal carotid artery disease. Neurology 2004; 62: 1291– 96
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bonati LH,
    2. Wetzel SG,
    3. Gandjour J,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke attributable to internal carotid artery dissection: the significance of vessel patency. Stroke 2008; 39: 483– 85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kim YD,
    2. Choi HY,
    3. Cho HJ,
    4. et al
    . Increasing frequency and burden of cerebral artery atherosclerosis in Korean stroke patients. Yonsei Med J 2010; 51: 318– 25
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Liu HM,
    2. Tu YK,
    3. Yip PK,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of intracranial and extracranial carotid steno-occlusive diseases in Taiwan Chinese patients with MR angiography: preliminary experience. Stroke 1996; 27: 650– 53
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wong KS,
    2. Huang YN,
    3. Gao S,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial stenosis in Chinese patients with acute stroke. Neurology 1998; 50: 812– 13
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wong KS,
    2. Ng PW,
    3. Tang A,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence of asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis in high-risk patients. Neurology 2007; 68: 2035– 38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kasner SE,
    2. Chimowitz MI,
    3. Lynn MJ,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Circulation 2006; 113: 555– 63
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kern R,
    2. Steinke W,
    3. Daffertshofer M,
    4. et al
    . Stroke recurrences in patients with symptomatic vs asymptomatic middle cerebral artery disease. Neurology 2005; 65: 859– 64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Famakin BM,
    2. Chimowitz MI,
    3. Lynn MJ,
    4. et al
    . Causes and severity of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke 2009; 40: 1999– 2003
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Akins PT,
    2. Pilgram TK,
    3. Cross DT 3rd.,
    4. et al
    . Natural history of stenosis from intracranial atherosclerosis by serial angiography. Stroke 1998; 29: 433– 38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Block F,
    2. Hoang PA
    . Oral anticoagulation in symptomatic intracranial stenoses [in German]. Nervenarzt 2003; 74: 523– 26. Epub 2003 May 10
    PubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI,
    2. Kokkinos J,
    3. Strong J,
    4. et al
    . The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study. Neurology 1995; 45: 1488– 93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kremer C,
    2. Schaettin T,
    3. Georgiadis D,
    4. et al
    . Prognosis of asymptomatic stenosis of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1300– 03
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Thijs VN,
    2. Albers GW
    . Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: outcome of patients who fail antithrombotic therapy. Neurology 2000; 55: 490– 97
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Thomas GN,
    2. Chen XY,
    3. Lin JW,
    4. et al
    . Middle cerebral artery stenosis increased the risk of vascular disease mortality among type 2 diabetic patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 261– 67
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Turan TN,
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Fiorella D,
    4. et al
    . Treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke 2009; 40: 2257– 61
    FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Gupta R,
    2. Schumacher HC,
    3. Mangla S,
    4. et al
    . Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology 2003; 61: 1729– 35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Marks MP,
    2. Marcellus M,
    3. Norbash AM,
    4. et al
    . Outcome of angioplasty for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis. Stroke 1999; 30: 1065– 69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Marks MP,
    2. Marcellus ML,
    3. Do HM,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis: long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 525– 30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Yoon W,
    2. Seo JJ,
    3. Cho KH,
    4. et al
    . Symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis treated with intracranial angioplasty: experience in 32 patients. Radiology 2005; 237: 620– 26
    PubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Leung TW,
    2. Yu SC,
    3. Lam WW,
    4. et al
    . Would self-expanding stent occlude middle cerebral artery perforators? Stroke 2009; 40: 1910– 12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Siddiq F,
    2. Vazquez G,
    3. Memon MZ,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of primary angioplasty with stent placement for treating symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic diseases: a multicenter study. Stroke 2008; 39: 2505– 10
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Suh DC,
    2. Kim JK,
    3. Choi JW,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial stenting of severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis: results of 100 consecutive patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 781– 85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Gröschel K,
    2. Schnaudigel S,
    3. Pilgram SM,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review on outcome after stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis. Stroke 2009; 40: e340– 47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Tsai ST,
    2. Yen PS,
    3. Wang YJ,
    4. et al
    . Superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass for ischemic atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery disease. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16: 1013– 17
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. O JH,
    2. Jang KS,
    3. Yoo Ie R,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of cerebrovascular reserve before and after STA-MCA bypass surgery by SPECT and SPM analysis. Korean J Radiol 2007; 8: 458– 65
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Gao S,
    2. Lam WW,
    3. Chan YL,
    4. et al
    . Optimal values of flow velocity on transcranial Doppler in grading middle cerebral artery stenosis in comparison with magnetic resonance angiography. J Neuroimaging 2002; 12: 213– 18
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Navarro JC,
    2. Lao AY,
    3. Sharma VK,
    4. et al
    . The accuracy of transcranial Doppler in the diagnosis of middle cerebral artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 325– 30
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Kaps M,
    2. Stolz E,
    3. Allendoerfer J
    . Prognostic value of transcranial sonography in acute stroke patients. Eur Neurol 2008; 59 (suppl 1): 9– 16
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Lien LM,
    2. Chen WH,
    3. Chen JR,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of transcranial color-coded sonography and magnetic resonance angiography in acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2001; 11: 363– 68
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Heiserman JE,
    2. Drayer BP,
    3. Keller PJ,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: evaluation with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1992; 185: 667– 73
    PubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Sawada M,
    2. Yano H,
    3. Shinoda J,
    4. et al
    . Symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis and occlusion: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with conventional angiography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1994; 34: 682– 85
    CrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Korogi Y,
    2. Takahashi M,
    3. Mabuchi N,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994; 193: 187– 93
    PubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Stock KW,
    2. Radue EW,
    3. Jacob AL,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial arteries: prospective blinded comparative study of MR angiography and DSA in 50 patients. Radiology 1995; 195: 451– 56
    PubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Korogi Y,
    2. Takahashi M,
    3. Nakagawa T,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18: 135– 43
    Abstract
  53. 53.↵
    1. Hirai T,
    2. Korogi Y,
    3. Ono K,
    4. et al
    . Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 93– 101
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Bash S,
    2. Villablanca JP,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1012– 21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Wong KS,
    2. Lam WW,
    3. Liang E,
    4. et al
    . Variability of magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography in grading middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke 1996; 27: 1084– 87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Willinek WA,
    2. Born M,
    3. Simon B,
    4. et al
    . Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging–initial experience. Radiology 2003; 229: 913– 20
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Willinek WA,
    2. Gieseke J,
    3. von Falkenhausen M,
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2004; 176: 21– 26
    PubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Choi CG,
    2. Lee DH,
    3. Lee JH,
    4. et al
    . Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 439– 46
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Furst G,
    2. Hofer M,
    3. Sitzer M,
    4. et al
    . Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19: 692– 99
    PubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Nederkoorn PJ,
    2. van der Graaf Y,
    3. Eikelboom BC,
    4. et al
    . Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1779– 84
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Man BL,
    2. Fu YP,
    3. Chan YY,
    4. et al
    . Use of magnetic resonance angiography to predict long-term outcomes of ischemic stroke patients with concurrent stenoses in Hong Kong. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 28: 112– 18
    CrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Suzuki T,
    2. Ogasawara K,
    3. Hirooka R,
    4. et al
    . Preoperative single-slab 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography predicts development of new cerebral ischemic events after carotid endarterectomy: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2009; 111: 141– 46
    CrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Miyazawa N,
    2. Akiyama I,
    3. Yamagata Z
    . Analysis of incidence and risk factors for progression in patients with intracranial steno-occlusive lesions by serial magnetic resonance angiography. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007; 109: 680– 85
    CrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Kwon SU,
    2. Cho YJ,
    3. Koo JS,
    4. et al
    . Cilostazol prevents the progression of the symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: the multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cilostazol in symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke 2005; 36: 782– 86. Epub 2005 Mar 3
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. Mok VC,
    2. Lam WW,
    3. Chen XY,
    4. et al
    . Statins for asymptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: the Regression of Cerebral Artery Stenosis study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 28: 18– 25
    CrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Prabhakaran S,
    2. Wells KR,
    3. Jhaveri MD,
    4. et al
    . Hemodynamic changes following Wingspan stent placement: a quantitative magnetic resonance angiography study. J Neuroimaging 2011; 21: e109– 13. Epub 2009 Jan 22
    CrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Prabhakaran S,
    2. Warrior L,
    3. Wells KR,
    4. et al
    . The utility of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of intracranial in-stent stenosis. Stroke 2009; 40: 991– 93. Epub 2009 Jan 22
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    1. Wasserman BA,
    2. Wityk RJ,
    3. Trout HH 3rd.,
    4. et al
    . Low-grade carotid stenosis: looking beyond the lumen with MRI. Stroke 2005; 36: 2504– 13
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    1. Glagov S,
    2. Weisenberg E,
    3. Zarins CK,
    4. et al
    . Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1371– 75
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.↵
    1. Niizuma K,
    2. Shimizu H,
    3. Takada S,
    4. et al
    . Middle cerebral artery plaque imaging using 3-Tesla high-resolution MRI. J Clin Neurosci 2008; 15: 1137– 41
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. 71.↵
    1. Xu WH,
    2. Li ML,
    3. Gao S,
    4. et al
    . In vivo high-resolution MR imaging of symptomatic and asymptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis. Atherosclerosis 2010; 212: 507– 11
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    1. Samuels OB,
    2. Joseph GJ,
    3. Lynn MJ,
    4. et al
    . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 643– 46
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 73.↵
    1. Klein IF,
    2. Lavallee PC,
    3. Touboul PJ,
    4. et al
    . In vivo middle cerebral artery plaque imaging by high-resolution MRI. Neurology 2006; 25 67: 327–29
  74. 74.↵
    1. Park JK,
    2. Kim SH,
    3. Kim BS,
    4. et al
    . Imaging of intracranial plaques with black-blood double inversion recovery MR imaging and CT. J Neuroimaging 2011; 21: e64– 68
    CrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Markl M,
    2. Uhl M,
    3. Wieben O,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution 3T MRI for the assessment of cervical and superficial cranial arteries in giant cell arteritis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 423– 27
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. 76.↵
    1. Turan TN,
    2. Bonilha L,
    3. Morgan PS,
    4. et al
    . Intraplaque hemorrhage in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. J Neuroimaging 2011; 21: e159– 61
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.↵
    1. Li ML,
    2. Xu WH,
    3. Song L,
    4. et al
    . Atherosclerosis of middle cerebral artery: evaluation with high-resolution MR imaging at 3T. Atherosclerosis 2009; 204: 447– 52
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. 78.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Cai J,
    3. Ma L,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. Radiology 2006; 240: 464– 72
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. 79.↵
    1. Swartz RH,
    2. Bhuta SS,
    3. Farb RI,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial arterial wall imaging using high-resolution 3-Tesla contrast-enhanced MRI. Neurology 2009; 72: 627– 34
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  80. 80.↵
    1. Hirai T,
    2. Korogi Y,
    3. Murata Y,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial artery dissections: serial evaluation with MR imaging, MR angiography, and source images of MR angiography. Radiat Med 2003; 21: 86– 93
    PubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Buhk JH,
    2. Ries T,
    3. Finck-Wedel AK,
    4. et al
    . Possibilities and limitations in imaging the intracranial arteries in the context of a contrast-enhanced whole-body magnetic resonance angiographic screening protocol at 1.5 versus 3 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomog 2011; 35: 4– 8
    CrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    1. Jahnke C,
    2. Dietrich T,
    3. Paetsch I,
    4. et al
    . Experimental evaluation of the detectability of submillimeter atherosclerotic lesions in ex vivo human iliac arteries with ultrahigh-field (7.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007; 23: 519– 27
    CrossRefPubMed
  83. 83.↵
    1. Kim YD,
    2. Choi HY,
    3. Jung YH,
    4. et al
    . Mirror pattern of cerebral artery atherosclerosis in patients with ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 2009; 16: 1159– 64
    CrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Mitsumori LM,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al
    . In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 2001; 104: 2051– 56
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    1. Watanabe Y,
    2. Nagayama M
    . MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 253– 74
    CrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    1. McAteer MA,
    2. Akhtar AM,
    3. von Zur Muhlen C,
    4. et al
    . An approach to molecular imaging of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular inflammation using microparticles of iron oxide. Atherosclerosis 2010; 209: 18– 27
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. 87.↵
    1. Kerwin WS,
    2. O'Brien KD,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al
    . Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study. Radiology 2006; 241: 459– 68
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.↵
    1. Lopez-Cancio E,
    2. Dorado L,
    3. Millan M,
    4. et al
    . The population-based Barcelona-Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis Study (ASIA): rationale and design. BMC Neurol 2011; 11: 22
  89. 89.↵
    1. Honda M,
    2. Kawahara I,
    3. Kitagawa N,
    4. et al
    . Asymptomatic carotid artery plaques: use of magnetic resonance imaging to characterize vulnerable plaques in 6 cases. Surg Neurol 2007; 67: 35– 39
    CrossRefPubMed
  90. 90.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Cai JM,
    3. Cai YQ,
    4. et al
    . Carotid plaque composition differs between ethno-racial groups: an MRI pilot study comparing mainland Chinese and American Caucasian patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25: 611– 16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  91. 91.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Kerwin WS,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al
    . Contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI for atherosclerotic carotid artery tissue characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 62– 67
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 8
1 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Angiography and Imaging for the Evaluation of Middle Cerebral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.J. Degnan, G. Gallagher, Z. Teng, J. Lu, Q. Liu, J.H. Gillard
MR Angiography and Imaging for the Evaluation of Middle Cerebral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2012, 33 (8) 1427-1435; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2697

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Angiography and Imaging for the Evaluation of Middle Cerebral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease
A.J. Degnan, G. Gallagher, Z. Teng, J. Lu, Q. Liu, J.H. Gillard
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2012, 33 (8) 1427-1435; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2697
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Clinical Syndrome
    • Intracranial Atherosclerosis
    • Presentation
    • Epidemiology
    • Risk, Management, and Outcomes
    • Imaging Findings
    • MRA
    • High-Resolution MR Imaging
    • Quantitative Assessment of Plaque Burden
    • Plaque Characterization
    • Recommended Imaging Protocol
    • Future Developments
    • Summary
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical Significance of Intraplaque Hemorrhage in Low- and High-Grade Basilar Artery Stenosis on High-Resolution MRI
  • Vessel wall imaging for intracranial vascular disease evaluation
  • High-resolution intracranial vessel wall imaging: imaging beyond the lumen
  • Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome, Part 2: Diagnostic Work-Up, Imaging Evaluation, and Differential Diagnosis
  • Isolated MCA Disease in Patients Without Significant Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: A High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
  • Distal Single Subcortical Infarction Had a Better Clinical Outcome Compared With Proximal Single Subcortical Infarction
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • An Atlas of Neonatal Neurovascular Imaging Anatomy as Depicted with Microvascular Imaging: The Intracranial Arteries
  • An Atlas of Neonatal Neurovascular Imaging Anatomy as Depicted with Microvascular Imaging: The Intracranial Veins
  • Clinical Translation of Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Probes for Glioma Imaging
Show more Review Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire