Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Factors Influencing Clinically Meaningful Recanalization after IV-rtPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke

A. Murphy, S.P. Symons, J. Hopyan and R.I. Aviv
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2013, 34 (1) 146-152; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3169
A. Murphy
aFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (A.M., S.P.S., R.I.V.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.P. Symons
aFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (A.M., S.P.S., R.I.V.)
cSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (S.P.S., J.H., R.I.V.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Hopyan
bNeurology (J.H.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
cSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (S.P.S., J.H., R.I.V.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.I. Aviv
aFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (A.M., S.P.S., R.I.V.)
cSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (S.P.S., J.H., R.I.V.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. del Zoppo GJ,
    2. Higashida RT,
    3. Furlan AJ,
    4. et al
    . PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. PROACT investigators. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. Stroke 1998;29:4–11
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Furlan A,
    2. Higashida R,
    3. Wechsler L,
    4. et al
    . Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999;282:2003–11
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Shi ZS,
    2. Loh Y,
    3. Walker G,
    4. et al
    . Clinical outcomes in middle cerebral artery trunk occlusions versus secondary division occlusions after mechanical thrombectomy: pooled analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and multi MERCI trials. Stroke 2010;41:953–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Smith WS
    . Safety of mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Results of the Multi Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) trial, part I. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1177–82
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Menon BK,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Eesa M,
    4. et al
    . Initial experience with the Penumbra stroke system for recanalization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2010;53:261–66
    PubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Smith WS,
    2. Sung G,
    3. Saver J,
    4. et al
    . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the multi MERCI trial. Stroke 2008;39:1205–12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hussein HM,
    2. Georgiadis AL,
    3. Vazquez G,
    4. et al
    . Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:454–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    IMS II Trial Investigators. The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II study. Stroke 2007;38:2127–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Singer OC,
    2. Berkefeld J,
    3. Lorenz MW,
    4. et al
    . Risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:368–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kase CS,
    2. Furlan AJ,
    3. Wechsler LR,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral hemorrhage after intra-arterial thrombolysis for ischemic stroke: the PROACT II trial. Neurology 2001;57:1603–10
    CrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Cloft HJ
    . Death and destruction in the intra-arterial battle with acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1769–70
    FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. von Kummer R,
    2. Holle R,
    3. Rosin L,
    4. et al
    . Does arterial recanalization improve outcome in carotid territory stroke? Stroke 1995;26:581–87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Marks MP,
    2. Olivot JM,
    3. Kemp S,
    4. et al
    . Patients with acute stroke treated with intravenous tPA 3–6 hours after stroke onset: correlations between MR angiography findings and perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging in the DEFUSE study. Radiology 2008;249:614–23
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Khatri P,
    2. Abruzzo T,
    3. Yeatts SD,
    4. et al
    . Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology 2009;73:1066–72
    CrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Suarez JI,
    3. Santillan C,
    4. et al
    . Response to intra-arterial and combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in patients with distal internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 2002;33:1821–26
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Alexandrov AV
    . Current and future recanalization strategies for acute ischemic stroke. J Intern Med 2010;267:209–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Puetz V,
    2. Dzialowski I,
    3. Hill MD,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial thrombus extent predicts clinical outcome, final infarct size and hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke: the clot burden score. Int J Stroke 2008;3:230–36
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Tan IY,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Hopyan J,
    4. et al
    . CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:525–31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mendonca N,
    2. Rodriguez-Luna D,
    3. Rubiera M,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of tissue-type plasminogen activator nonresponders according to location of vessel occlusion. Stroke 2011;43:417–21
    PubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Kaste M,
    3. Fieschi C,
    4. et al
    . Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA 1995;274:1017–25
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Adams HP Jr.,
    2. Leclerc JR,
    3. Bluhmki E,
    4. et al
    . Measuring outcomes as a function of baseline severity of ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;18:124–29
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wagenmakers EJ,
    2. Farrell S
    . AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon Bull Rev 2004;11:192–96
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–87
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Adams HP Jr.,
    2. del Zoppo G,
    3. Alberts MJ,
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research interdisciplinary working groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2007;38:1655–711
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Barber PA,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. et al
    . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS study group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Adams HP Jr.,
    2. Davis PH,
    3. Leira EC,
    4. et al
    . Baseline NIH stroke scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology 1999;53:126–31
    CrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Goyal M
    . Poor clinical outcome despite successful arterial recanalization. What went wrong? How can we do better? Neuroradiology 2010;52:341–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Maas MB,
    2. Furie KL,
    3. Lev MH,
    4. et al
    . National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score is poorly predictive of proximal occlusion in acute cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2009;40:2988–93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Furlan AJ,
    3. Al-Rawi Y,
    4. et al
    . Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:141–50
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Davis SM,
    2. Donnan GA,
    3. Parsons MW,
    4. et al
    . Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:299–309
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Albers G,
    3. Al-Rawi Y,
    4. et al
    . The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005;36:66–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kimura K,
    2. Iguchi Y,
    3. Shibazaki K,
    4. et al
    . Recanalization within one hour after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator is associated with favorable outcome in acute stroke patients. Eur Neurol 2010;63:331–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Saqqur M,
    2. Uchino K,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. et al
    . Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke 2007;38:948–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. del Zoppo GJ,
    2. Poeck K,
    3. Pessin MS,
    4. et al
    . Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute thrombotic and embolic stroke. Ann Neurol 1992;32:78–86
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kucinski T,
    2. Koch C,
    3. Eckert B,
    4. et al
    . Collateral circulation is an independent radiological predictor of outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2003;45:11–18
    PubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Christou I,
    2. Felberg RA,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. et al
    . Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and flow improvement in acute ischemic stroke patients with internal carotid artery occlusion. J Neuroimaging 2002;12:119–23
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Jansen O,
    2. von Kummer R,
    3. Forsting M,
    4. et al
    . Thrombolytic therapy in acute occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery bifurcation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1977–86
    Abstract
  38. 38.↵
    1. Murphy BD,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. et al
    . Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006;37:1771–77
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Janardhan V,
    2. Qureshi AI
    . Mechanisms of ischemic brain injury. Curr Cardiol Rep 2004;6:117–23
    PubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Miteff F,
    2. Levi CR,
    3. Bateman GA,
    4. et al
    . The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2009;132:2231–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Christoforidis GA,
    2. Mohammad Y,
    3. Kehagias D,
    4. et al
    . Angiographic assessment of pial collaterals as a prognostic indicator following intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1789–97
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 1
1 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors Influencing Clinically Meaningful Recanalization after IV-rtPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Murphy, S.P. Symons, J. Hopyan, R.I. Aviv
Factors Influencing Clinically Meaningful Recanalization after IV-rtPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) 146-152; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3169

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Factors Influencing Clinically Meaningful Recanalization after IV-rtPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke
A. Murphy, S.P. Symons, J. Hopyan, R.I. Aviv
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) 146-152; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3169
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Early recanalization in large-vessel occlusion stroke patients transferred for endovascular treatment
  • Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy for large vessel strokes can lead to significantly higher hospital costs without improving outcomes
  • Novel methodology to replicate clot analogs with diverse composition in acute ischemic stroke
  • Validating a Predictive Model of Acute Advanced Imaging Biomarkers in Ischemic Stroke
  • Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap III Imaging Selection and Outcomes in Acute Stroke Reperfusion Clinical Trials: Consensus Recommendations and Further Research Priorities
  • Effect of Collaterals on Clinical Presentation, Baseline Imaging, Complications, and Outcome in Acute Stroke
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Contribution and Additional Impact of Imaging to the SPAN-100 Score
  • Computed Tomography Angiography in Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke: Prognostic Implications and Role in Decision-Making
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Guided vs Conventional Angiography Systems
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire