Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Evolution of Cortical and Thalamus Atrophy and Disability Progression in Early Relapsing-Remitting MS during 5 Years

R. Zivadinov, N. Bergsland, O. Dolezal, S. Hussein, Z. Seidl, M.G. Dwyer, M. Vaneckova, J. Krasensky, J.A. Potts, T. Kalincik, E. Havrdová and D. Horáková
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2013, 34 (10) 1931-1939; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3503
R. Zivadinov
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (R.Z., N.B., S.H., M.G.D.)
bJacobs Neurological Institute (R.Z.), University at Buffalo SUNY, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Bergsland
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (R.Z., N.B., S.H., M.G.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Dolezal
cDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience (O.D., T.K., E.H., D.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Hussein
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (R.Z., N.B., S.H., M.G.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z. Seidl
dDepartment of Radiology (Z.S., M.V., J.K.), Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.G. Dwyer
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (R.Z., N.B., S.H., M.G.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Vaneckova
dDepartment of Radiology (Z.S., M.V., J.K.), Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Krasensky
dDepartment of Radiology (Z.S., M.V., J.K.), Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.A. Potts
fBiogen Idec Inc. (J.A.P.), Weston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Kalincik
cDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience (O.D., T.K., E.H., D.H.)
eMelbourne Brain Centre (T.K.), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Havrdová
cDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience (O.D., T.K., E.H., D.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Horáková
cDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience (O.D., T.K., E.H., D.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Temporal changes in global and tissue-specific MR imaging measures by disability-progression status at different time points of the study are shown as mean ± 95% confidence intervals and median ± interquartile range, as appropriate. A, Percentage change in whole-brain volume. B, T2-lesion volume. C, Percentage change in lateral ventricular volume. D, Percentage change in cortical volume.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Changes in global and tissue-specific MR imaging measures (fitted values–intercept model) by disability-progression status with time. Percentage change in whole-brain volume: interaction P < .001 (A); and T2-lesion volume: interaction P = not significant (B). C, Percentage change in lateral ventricular volume: interaction P < .001. D, Percentage change in cortical volume: interaction P < .001.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Temporal changes in deep gray matter MR imaging measures by disability-progression status at different time points of the study are shown as mean ± 95% confidence intervals and median ± interquartile range, as appropriate. Total deep gray matter volume (A) and thalamus volume (B).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Changes in deep gray matter MR imaging measures (fitted values–intercept model) by disability-progression status with time. Total deep gray matter volume: interaction P = .0095 (A); and thalamus volume: P = .0006 (B).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics for all patients, split by progression status at 5 yearsa

    Sustained Disease Progression (n = 90)Stable Disease (n = 90)P Value
    Female (No.) (%)68 (75.6)73 (81.1).4
    Age (yr) (mean) (SD) (median)31.9 (7.9) 31.529.5 (7.8) 28.5.04
    Disease duration (yr) (mean) (SD) (median)6.0 (5.8) 4.04.0 (4.3) 3.0.01
    EDSS (mean) (SD)2.0 (1.0)1.8 (0.8).2
    Median (range)2.0 (0–3.5)2.0 (0–3.5)
    Treatment assignment (No.) (%)
        IFN-β 1a monotherapy25 (27.8%)34 (37.8%).3
        IFN-β 1a + AZA32 (35.6%)26 (28.9%)
        IFN-β 1a + AZA + Steroids33 (36.7%)30 (33.3%)
    Treatment switchb
    Did not switch34 (38%)62 (69%)<.0001
    Switched56 (62%)26 (29%)
    • Note:—IFN-β indicates interferon-β; AZA, azathioprine.

    • ↵a The difference of the means between the groups was calculated using the Student t test, Pearson χ2 test, or Mann-Whitney rank sum test, as appropriate.

    • ↵b Treatment switch was defined on the basis of a derived yes/no variable as to whether patients changed treatment status during the 5-year follow-up.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Baseline MRI characteristics for all patients, split by progression status at 5 yearsa

    Sustained Disease Progression (n = 90) (mean) (SD) (median)Stable Disease (n = 90) (mean) (SD) (median)P Value
    T2-LV11.2 (12.9) 6.34.7 (5.5) 2.8<.0001
    NWBV1488.8 (84.4) 1485.61524.4 (74.1) 1520.6.003
    NGMV797.9 (53.1) 800.2815.5 (50) 822.7.02
    NWMV690.9 (49.9) 689.5708.9 (37.4) 704.5.007
    NLVV42.6 (15.1) 39.740 (11.8) 38.9.3
    NCV623.6 (43.3) 627639.7 (41.3) 643.6.01
    Total NSDGMV44.5 (4.5) 44.546.6 (3.9) 46.4.002
    NSDGMV structures
        Caudate nucleus6.4 (0.8) 6.46.8 (0.8) 6.8.0009
        Putamen9.4 (1.1) 9.39.8 (1) 9.9.015
        Globus pallidus3.4 (0.4) 3.43.5 (0.4) 3.5.05
        Thalamus14.6 (1.8) 14.615.4 (1.5) 15.2.002
        Hippocampus7.2 (0.8) 7.27.5 (0.8) 7.6.015
        Nucleus accumbens0.9 (0.2) 0.91 (0.2) 1.018
        Amygdala2.6 (0.4) 2.62.6 (0.3) 2.6.14
    • Note:—LV indicates lesion volume; NWBV, normalized whole-brain volume; NGMV, normalized gray matter volume; NWMV, normalized white matter volume; NLVV, normalized lateral ventricle volume; NCV, normalized cortical volume; NSDGMV, normalized subcortical deep gray matter volume.

    • ↵a The difference of the means between the groups was calculated using Student t test. The MRI volumes are presented in milliliters.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Evolution of whole-brain and tissue-specific MRI measures during 5 years, split by progression status at 5 yearsa

    Sustained Disease Progression (mean) (SD) (median)Stable Disease (mean) (SD) (median)P Value
    T2-LV (No. patients)8078
    Absolute change2.8 (6.3) 1.62.3 (3.8) 1.0
    % Change53.9 (66.7) 36.379.1 (156.4) 40.5.4
    Whole-brain (No. patients)8280
    % Change−4.8 (3.4) −3.9−2.6 (2) −2.2<.0001
    Gray matter (No. patients)8279
    % Change−5.3 (3.1) −4.5−3.8 (2.3) −4.1.003
    White matter (No. patients)8279
    % Change−0.9 (3.4) −0.50.4 (3.1) 0.8.06
    Lateral ventricle volume, (No. patients)8279
    % Change26.7 (24.8) 22.614.9 (11.3) 13.4.02
    Cortical volume (No. patients)8078
    % Change−5.4 (3.1) −4.9−3.8 (2.2) −4.001
    • Note:—T2-LV indicates T2-lesion volume.

    • ↵a The difference between the groups was calculated using regression analysis adjusting for age, disease duration, and change of treatment status during the 5-year follow-up. The absolute volume changes are presented in milliliters. Variables with skewed distributions (% change in T2-LV and % change in LV) were transformed using Box-Cox transformations. The changes between baseline and follow-up scans for whole-brain, gray matter, white matter, lateral ventricle, and cortical volume were calculated using the direct-measurement technique; hence, no absolute but only percentage volume changes are available.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Evolution of tissue-specific subcortical deep gray matter structures during 5 years, split by progression status at 5 yearsa

    Sustained Disease Progression (mean) (SD) (median)Stable Disease (mean) (SD) (median)P Value
    Total SDGMV (No. patients)8178
        Absolute change−2.5 (1.6) −2.5−2 (1.1) −1.9
        % Change−5.7 (3.8) −5.3−4.4 (2.5) −4.03
    SDGMV structures
        Caudate nucleus (No. patients)8079
            Absolute change−0.4 (0.4) −0.3−0.3 (0.3) −0.3
            % Change−5.9 (7) −5.1−4.5 (4.6) −4.5.3
        Putamen (No. patients)8079
            Absolute change−0.5 (0.4) −0.5−0.4 (0.4) − 0.5
            % Change−5.8 (4.2) −5.7−4.3 (3.7) −4.5.02
        Globus pallidus (No. patients)8079
            Absolute change−0.06 (0.02) −0.07−0.02 (0.02) −0.02
            % Change−1.8 (5.1) −2.1−0.5 (4.5) −0.7.99
        Thalamus (No. patients)8079
            Absolute change−0.9 (0.6) −0.8−0.7 (0.5) −0.6
            % Change−6.2 (4.4) −5.5−4.5 (3.2) −3.9.01
        Hippocampus (No. patients)8079
            Absolute change−0.4 (0.4) −0.4−0.4 (0.4) −0.4
            % Change−5.5 (5.5) −5.7−5.6 (5.6) −4.8.9
        Nucleus accumbens (No. patients)8079
            Absolute change−0.08 (0.1) −0.08−0.09 (0.1) −0.1
            % Change−7.6 (14.8) −9.1−8.7 (11.8) −10.1
        Amygdala (No. patients)8079
            Absolute change−0.1 (0.2) −0.2−0.1 (0.3) −0.2
            % Change−5.1 (8.3) −6.2−4.6 (9.7) −5.8.95
    • Note:—SDGMV indicates subcortical deep gray matter volume.

    • ↵a The difference between the groups was calculated using regression analysis adjusting for age, disease duration, and change of treatment status during the 5-year follow-up. The absolute volume changes are presented in milliliters. Variables with skewed distributions (% change in globus pallidus and % change in amygdala) were transformed using Box-Cox transformations.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 10
1 Oct 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evolution of Cortical and Thalamus Atrophy and Disability Progression in Early Relapsing-Remitting MS during 5 Years
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R. Zivadinov, N. Bergsland, O. Dolezal, S. Hussein, Z. Seidl, M.G. Dwyer, M. Vaneckova, J. Krasensky, J.A. Potts, T. Kalincik, E. Havrdová, D. Horáková
Evolution of Cortical and Thalamus Atrophy and Disability Progression in Early Relapsing-Remitting MS during 5 Years
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2013, 34 (10) 1931-1939; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3503

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Evolution of Cortical and Thalamus Atrophy and Disability Progression in Early Relapsing-Remitting MS during 5 Years
R. Zivadinov, N. Bergsland, O. Dolezal, S. Hussein, Z. Seidl, M.G. Dwyer, M. Vaneckova, J. Krasensky, J.A. Potts, T. Kalincik, E. Havrdová, D. Horáková
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2013, 34 (10) 1931-1939; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3503
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Thalamic atrophy measured by artificial intelligence in a multicentre clinical routine real-world study is associated with disability progression
  • Functional impairment of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in Multiple Sclerosis
  • Innate Immune Cell-Related Pathology in the Thalamus Signals a Risk for Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis
  • Damage of the lateral geniculate nucleus in MS: Assessing the missing node of the visual pathway
  • A Serial 10-Year Follow-Up Study of Atrophied Brain Lesion Volume and Disability Progression in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting MS
  • Fingolimod effect on gray matter, thalamus, and white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis
  • MRI evaluation of thalamic volume differentiates MS from common mimics
  • Longitudinal Mixed-Effect Model Analysis of the Association between Global and Tissue-Specific Brain Atrophy and Lesion Accumulation in Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Correlation between brain volume loss and clinical and MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis
  • Brain atrophy and disability progression in multiple sclerosis patients: a 10-year follow-up study
  • Subcortical Deep Gray Matter Pathology in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Is Associated with White Matter Lesion Burden and Atrophy but Not with Cortical Atrophy: A Diffusion Tensor MRI Study
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire