Predators and Cranks

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Kolata G

   . Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). New York Times. April 7, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed September 16, 2013
2. 2.↵
   Beall's list of predatory, open-access publishers. http://www.academia.edu/1151857/Bealls_List_of_Predatory_Open-Access_Publishers. Accessed September 16, 2013
3. 3.↵
   1. Butler D

   . Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature 2013;445. http://www.nature.com/news/investigating-journals-the-dark-side-of-publishing-1.12666. Accessed September 16, 2013
4. 4.↵
   1. Sanchez J

   . Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012;489. http://www.nature.com/news/predatory-publishers-are-corrupting-open-access-1.11385. Accessed September 16, 2013
5. 5.↵
   1. Aldhous P

   . CRAP paper accepted by journal. New Scientist 2009. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-journal.html#.Ujc7HD-Jnq5. Accessed September 16, 2013
6. 6.↵
   1. Grant B

   . Elsevier published 6 fake journals. The Scientist 2009. http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/27383/title/Elsevier-published-6-fake-journals. Accessed September 16, 2013
7. 7.↵
   1. Gorski D

   . Crank “scientific” conferences: a parody of science-based medicine that can deceive even reputable scientists and institutions. Science-Based Medicine 2009. http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/crank-conferences-a-parody-of-science-based-medicine-that-can-suck-in-even-reputable-scientists-and-institutions. Accessed September 16, 2013