Super-Resolution Track Density Imaging of Glioblastoma: Histopathologic Correlation

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Calamante F,
   2. Tournier JD,
   3. Jackson GD,
   4. et al

   . Track-density imaging (TDI): super-resolution white matter imaging using whole-brain track-density mapping. Neuroimage 2010;53:1233–43

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Calamante F,
   2. Tournier JD,
   3. Heidemann RM,
   4. et al

   . Track density imaging (TDI): validation of super resolution property. Neuroimage 2011;56:1259–66

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Calamante F,
   2. Tournier JD,
   3. Kurniawan ND,
   4. et al

   . Super-resolution track-density imaging studies of mouse brain: comparison to histology. Neuroimage 2012;59:286–96

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Hess CP,
   2. Mukherjee P

   . Visualizing white matter pathways in the living human brain: diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007;17:407–26, vii

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. von Morze C,
   2. Xu D,
   3. Hess CP

   . Development and evaluation of a robust and efficient computational pipeline for track density imaging for use in a clinical research environment. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance Medicine, Montreal, Canada; May 12, 2011. Abstract 4025
6. 6.↵
   1. Smith SM

   . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Tournier JD,
   2. Calamante F,
   3. Connelly A

   . Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 2007;35:1459–72

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Tournier JD,
   2. Calamante F,
   3. Connelly A

   . Improved probabilistic streamlines tractography by 2nd order integration over fibre orientation distributions. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden; May 5, 2010. Abstract 1670
9. 9.↵
   1. Barajas RF Jr.,
   2. Hodgson JG,
   3. Chang JS,
   4. et al

   . Glioblastoma multiforme regional genetic and cellular expression patterns: influence on anatomic and physiologic MR imaging. Radiology 2010;254:564–76

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Burger PC,
    2. Shibata T,
    3. Kleihues P

    . The use of the monoclonal antibody Ki-67 in the identification of proliferating cells: application to surgical neuropathology. Am J Surg Pathol 1986;10:611–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Karamitopoulou E,
    2. Perentes E,
    3. Diamantis I

    . Ki-67 immunoreactivity in human central nervous system tumors: a study with MIB 1 monoclonal antibody on archival material. Acta Neuropathol 1994;87:47–54

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Bellail AC,
    2. Hunter SB,
    3. Brat DJ,
    4. et al

    . Microregional extracellular matrix heterogeneity in brain modulates glioma cell invasion. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004;36:1046–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Spicer AP,
    2. Joo A,
    3. Bowling RA

    . A hyaluronan binding link protein gene family whose members are physically linked adjacent to chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan core protein genes: the missing links. J Biol Chem 2003;278:21083–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Batra A,
    2. Tripathi RP,
    3. Singh AK

    . Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy of cerebral gliomas showing imperceptible contrast enhancement on conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Australasian Radiol 2004:48:324–32

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Ginsberg LE,
    2. Fuller GN,
    3. Hashmi M,
    4. et al

    . The significance of lack of MR contrast enhancement of supratentorial brain tumors in adults: histopathological evaluation of a series. Surg Neurol 1998;49:436–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Law M,
    2. Yang S,
    3. Wang H,
    4. et al

    . Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1989–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Wen PY,
    2. Macdonald DR,
    3. Reardon DA,
    4. et al

    . Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1963–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Jaworski DM,
    2. Kelly GM,
    3. Hockfield S

    . BEHAB, a new member of the proteoglycan tandem repeat family of hyaluronan-binding proteins that is restricted to the brain. J Cell Biol 1994;125:495–509

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Bekku Y,
    2. Vargová L,
    3. Goto Y,
    4. et al

    . Bral1: its role in diffusion barrier formation and conduction velocity in the CNS. J Neurosci 2010;30:3113–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Scholz M,
    2. Noack V,
    3. Pechlivanis I,
    4. et al

    . Vibrography during tumor neurosurgery. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:985–92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Paszek MJ,
    2. Zahir N,
    3. Johnson KR,
    4. et al

    . Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005;8:241–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Butcher DT,
    2. Alliston T,
    3. Weaver VM

    . A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:108–22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Saha K,
    2. Keung AJ,
    3. Irwin EF,
    4. et al

    . Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys J 2008;95:4426–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Ulrich TA,
    2. de Juan Pardo EM,
    3. Kumar S

    . The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res 2009;69:4167–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Georges PC,
    2. Miller WJ,
    3. Meaney DF,
    4. et al

    . Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. Biophys J 2006;90:3012–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science