Effects of Increased Image Noise on Image Quality and Quantitative Interpretation in Brain CT Perfusion

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Provenzale JM,
   2. Shah K,
   3. Patel U,
   4. et al

   . Systematic review of CT and MR perfusion imaging for assessment of acute cerebrovascular disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1476–82

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Turk A,
   2. Magarik JA,
   3. Chaudry I,
   4. et al

   . CT perfusion-guided patient selection for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is safe and effective. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;4:261–65

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Konstas AA,
   2. Wintermark M,
   3. Lev MH

   . CT perfusion imaging in acute stroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2011;21:215–38, ix.

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Suzuki K,
   2. Morita S,
   3. Masukawa A,
   4. et al

   . Utility of CT perfusion with 64-row multi-detector CT for acute ischemic brain stroke. Emerg Radiol 2011;18:95–101

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Loftus ML,
   2. Minkowitz S,
   3. Tsiouris AJ,
   4. et al

   . Utilization guidelines for reducing radiation exposure in the evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a practice quality improvement project. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:176–80

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Sanelli PC,
   2. Jou A,
   3. Gold R,
   4. et al

   . Using CT perfusion during the early baseline period in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage to assess for development of vasospasm. Neuroradiology 2011;53:425–34

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Ko NU,
   3. Smith WS,
   4. et al

   . Vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: utility of perfusion CT and CT angiography on diagnosis and management. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:26–34

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Sanelli PC,
   2. Ugorec I,
   3. Johnson CE,
   4. et al

   . Using quantitative CT perfusion for evaluation of delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2047–53

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Ramli N,
   2. Rahmat K,
   3. Mah E,
   4. et al

   . Use of permeability surface area-product to differentiate intracranial tumours from abscess. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2009;5:e6

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Sergides I,
    2. Hussain Z,
    3. Naik S,
    4. et al

    . Utilization of dynamic CT perfusion in the study of intracranial meningiomas and their surrounding tissue. Neurol Res 2009;31:84–89

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ding B,
    2. Ling HW,
    3. Chen KM,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of cerebral blood volume and permeability in preoperative grading of intracranial glioma using CT perfusion imaging. Neuroradiology 2006;48:773–81

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Fainardi E,
    2. Di Biase F,
    3. Borrelli M,
    4. et al

    . Potential role of CT perfusion parameters in the identification of solitary intra-axial brain tumor grading. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2010;106:283–87

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Smith AB,
    2. Dillon WP,
    3. Gould R,
    4. et al

    . Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1628–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Smith WS,
    3. Ko NU,
    4. et al

    . Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution and contrast volume for calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:720–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Britten AJ,
    2. Crotty M,
    3. Kiremidjian H,
    4. et al

    . The addition of computer simulated noise to investigate radiation dose and image quality in images with spatial correlation of statistical noise: an example application to x-ray CT of the brain. Br J Radiol 2004;77:323–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Saito N,
    2. Kudo K,
    3. Sasaki T,
    4. et al

    . Realization of reliable cerebral-blood-flow maps from low-dose CT perfusion images by statistical noise reduction using nonlinear diffusion filtering. Radiol Phys Technol 2008;1:62–74

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Maeder P,
    3. Thiran JP,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flows by perfusion CT studies at low injection rates: a critical review of the underlying theoretical models. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1220–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Sanelli PC,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Eastwood JD,
    4. et al

    . The effect of varying user-selected input parameters on quantitative values in CT perfusion maps. Acad Radiol 2004;11:1085–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Lau BC,
    3. Chien J,
    4. et al

    . The anterior cerebral artery is an appropriate arterial input function for perfusion-CT processing in patients with acute stroke. Neuroradiology 2008;50:227–36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Liang K-Y,
    2. Zeger SL

    . Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13–22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Cunningham M

    . More than Just the Kappa Coefficient: A Program to Fully Characterize Inter-Rater Reliability between Two Raters [Internet]. SAS Global Forum 2009. 2009 [cited 2012 May 22]; Available from: http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings09/242–2009.pdf
22. 22.↵
    1. Krissak R,
    2. Mistretta CA,
    3. Henzler T,
    4. et al

    . Noise reduction and image quality improvement of low dose and ultra low dose brain perfusion CT by HYPR-LR processing. PloS One 2011;6:e17098

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Mayo JR,
    2. Hartman TE,
    3. Lee KS,
    4. et al

    . CT of the chest: minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:603–07

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science