Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverting Stents: Computational Models with Intravascular Blood Flow Measurements

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Lylyk P,
   2. Miranda C,
   3. Ceratto R,
   4. et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Zhang Y,
   2. Chong W,
   3. Qian Y

   . Investigation of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics following flow diverter stent treatment. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:608–15

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. McAuliffe W,
   2. Wycoco V,
   3. Rice H,
   4. et al

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. O'Kelly CJ,
   2. Spears J,
   3. Chow M,
   4. et al

   . Canadian experience with the Pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:381–87

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Piano M,
   2. Valvassori L,
   3. Quilici L,
   4. et al

   . Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2013;118:408–16

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Yu SC,
   2. Kwok CK,
   3. Cheng PW,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device: a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Hampton T,
   2. Walsh D,
   3. Tolias C,
   4. et al

   . Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:167–71

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Velat GJ,
   2. Fargen KM,
   3. Lawson MF,
   4. et al

   . Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage following Pipeline embolization device treatment for a giant recanalized ophthalmic aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:e24

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Kulcsar Z,
   2. Houdart E,
   3. Bonafe A,
   4. et al

   . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Shojima M,
    2. Oshima M,
    3. Takagi K,
    4. et al

    . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Miura Y,
    2. Ishida F,
    3. Umeda Y,
    4. et al

    . Low wall shear stress is independently associated with the rupture status of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:519–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Meng H,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Hoi Y,
    4. et al

    . Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke 2007;38:1924–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Chen J,
    4. et al

    . Influence of hemodynamics on recanalization of totally occluded intracranial aneurysms: a patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation study. J Neurosurg 2012;117:276–83

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Augsburger L,
    3. Reymond P,
    4. et al

    . Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1827–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Mut F,
    2. Cebral JR

    . Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2010–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M,
    4. et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Hassan T,
    2. Ahmed YM,
    3. Hassan AA

    . The adverse effects of flow-diverter stent-like devices on the flow pattern of saccular intracranial aneurysm models: computational fluid dynamics study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1633–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Venugopal P,
    2. Valentino D,
    3. Schmitt H,
    4. et al

    . Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1051–60

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Marzo A,
    2. Singh P,
    3. Larrabide I,
    4. et al

    . Computational hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms: the effects of modeled versus measured boundary conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:884–96

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Levitt MR,
    2. Cooke DL,
    3. Ghodke BV,
    4. et al

    . “Stent view” flat-detector CT and stent-assisted treatment strategies for complex intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2011;75:275–78

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Bach RG,
    2. Kern MJ

    . Practical coronary physiology: clinical application of the Doppler flow velocity guide wire. Cardiol Clin 1997;15:77–99

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. Siebes M,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial blood-flow velocity and pressure measurements using an intra-arterial dual-sensor guidewire. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:324–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Schneiders JJ,
    2. Ferns SP,
    3. van Ooij P,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of phase-contrast MR imaging and endovascular sonography for intracranial blood flow velocity measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1786–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Chaloupka JC,
    2. Viñuela F,
    3. Kimme-Smith C,
    4. et al

    . Use of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular blood flow measurements: a validation study for potential neurologic endovascular applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:509–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Augsburger L,
    2. Reymond P,
    3. Rufenacht DA,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial stents being modeled as a porous medium: flow simulation in stented cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:850–63

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Larrabide I,
    2. Aguilar ML,
    3. Morales HG,
    4. et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow changes induced by flow diverters: relation to aneurysm size and shape. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:816–22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Shobayashi Y,
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Kakizaki R,
    4. et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations by a self-expandable intracranial stent and flow diversion stent: high intra-aneurysmal pressure remains regardless of flow velocity reduction. J Neurointerv Surg 2013; 5 Suppl 3:iii38–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Schneiders JJ,
    2. Vanbavel E,
    3. Majoie CB,
    4. et al

    . A flow-diverting stent is not a pressure-diverting stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E1–4

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Reymond P,
    2. Bohraus Y,
    3. Perren F,
    4. et al

    . Validation of a patient-specific one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011;301:H1173–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Ford MD,
    2. Alperin N,
    3. Lee SH,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2005;26:477–88

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Yen C,
    3. Grossman RG,
    4. et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:479–85

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Yen C,
    3. Diaz O,
    4. et al

    . Temporal variations of wall shear stress parameters in intracranial aneurysms—importance of patient-specific inflow waveforms for CFD calculations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1391–98

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Melamed E,
    2. Lavy S,
    3. Bentin S,
    4. et al

    . Reduction in regional cerebral blood flow during normal aging in man. Stroke 1980;11:31–35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Wasserman BA,
    3. Xie YJ,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms at the carotid bifurcations of older adults. Physiol Meas 2010;31:291–302

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Hassan T,
    2. Ezura M,
    3. Timofeev EV,
    4. et al

    . Computational simulation of therapeutic parent artery occlusion to treat giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:63–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Sun Q,
    2. Groth A,
    3. Aach T

    . Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Med Phys 2012;39:742–54

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Jou LD,
    2. Quick CM,
    3. Young WL,
    4. et al

    . Computational approach to quantifying hemodynamic forces in giant cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1804–10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Boussel L,
    2. Rayz V,
    3. Martin A,
    4. et al

    . Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:409–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Rayz VL,
    2. Boussel L,
    3. Acevedo-Bolton G,
    4. et al

    . Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:051011
40. 40.↵
    1. Sviri GE,
    2. Ghodke B,
    3. Britz GW,
    4. et al

    . Transcranial Doppler grading criteria for basilar artery vasospasm. Neurosurgery 2006;59:360–66

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Turner CL,
    2. Higgins JN,
    3. Kirkpatrick PJ

    . Assessment of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography for the surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. Neurosurgery 2003;53:866–71

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Ackerstaff RG,
    2. Suttorp MJ,
    3. van den Berg JC,
    4. et al

    . Prediction of early cerebral outcome by transcranial Doppler monitoring in carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:618–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Chang W,
    2. Landgraf B,
    3. Johnson KM,
    4. et al

    . Velocity measurements in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using 3D radial phase-contrast HYPRFlow: comparison with transcranial Doppler sonography and 2D phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:54–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Putman CM,
    3. Alley MT,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamics in normal cerebral arteries: qualitative comparison of 4D phase-contrast magnetic resonance and image-based computational fluid dynamics. J Eng Math 2009;64:367–78

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Waydhas C

    . Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care 1999;3:R83–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Mynard JP,
    2. Wasserman BA,
    3. Steinman DA

    . Errors in the estimation of wall shear stress by maximum Doppler velocity. Atherosclerosis 2013;227:259–66

    CrossRefPubMed