Comparison of Multiecho Postprocessing Schemes for SWI with Use of Linear and Nonlinear Mask Functions

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Haacke EM,
   2. Mittal S,
   3. Wu Z,
   4. et al

   . Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:19–30

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Reichenbach JR,
   2. Venkatesan R,
   3. Schillinger DJ,
   4. et al

   . Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology 1997;204:272–77

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Sehgal V,
   2. Delproposto Z,
   3. Haddar D,
   4. et al

   . Susceptibility-weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:41–51

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Haacke EM,
   2. Makki M,
   3. Ge Y,
   4. et al

   . Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:537–44

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Wu Z,
   2. Mittal S,
   3. Kish K,
   4. et al

   . Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a case study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:177–82

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Yao B,
   2. Li TQ,
   3. Gelderen P,
   4. et al

   . Susceptibility contrast in high field MRI of human brain as a function of tissue iron content. Neuroimage 2009;44:1259–66

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Brainovich V,
   2. Sabatini U,
   3. Hagberg GE

   . Advantages of using multiple-echo image combination and asymmetric triangular phase masking in magnetic resonance venography at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:23–37

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Denk C,
   2. Rauscher A

   . Susceptibility weighted imaging with multiple echoes. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:185–91

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Casciaro S,
   2. Bianco R,
   3. Franchini R,
   4. et al

   . A new automatic phase mask filter for high-resolution brain venography at 3 T: theoretical background and experimental validation. Magn Reson Imaging 2010;28:511–19

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Quinn MP,
    2. Klassen LM,
    3. Gati JS,
    4. et al

    . Frequency-based multi-echo susceptibility weighted imaging. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; May 5–11, 2012; Melbourne, Australia.
11. 11.↵
    1. Noll DC,
    2. Nishimura DG,
    3. Macovski A

    . Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:154–63

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Cheng YC,
    4. et al

    . Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Tallantyre EC,
    2. Dixon JE,
    3. Donaldson I,
    4. et al

    . Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions. Neurology 2011;76:534–39

    CrossRef