Effect of the CT Table Strap on Radiation Exposure and Image Quality during Cervical Spine CT

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Costello JE,
   3. Cecava ND,
   4. Tucker JE, et al

   . CT radiation dose: current controversies and dose reduction strategies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:1283–90

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Goske MJ,
   3. Applegate KE,
   4. Boylan J, et al

   . The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:273–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Hara AK,
   3. Paden RG,
   4. Silva AC, et al

   . Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:764–71

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Silva AC,
   3. Lawder HJ,
   4. Hara A, et al

   . Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:191–99

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Yu L,
   3. Bruesewitz MR,
   4. Thomas KB, et al

   . Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2011;31:835–48

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Boone JM,
   3. Strauss KJ,
   4. Cody DD, et al

   . Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations: Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park, Maryland: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2011
7. 7.↵
   2. Schindera ST,
   3. Nelson RC,
   4. Toth TL, et al

   . Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W100–05

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Huda W,
   3. Mettler FA

   . Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology 2011;258:236–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. McCollough CH,
   3. Leng S,
   4. Yu L, et al

   . CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 2011;259:311–16

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Brady SL,
    3. Kaufman RA

    . Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology 2012;265:832–40

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Brink M,
    3. de Lange F,
    4. Oostveen LJ, et al

    . Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma CT of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose. Radiology 2008;249:661–70

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Kane AG,
    3. Reilly KC,
    4. Murphy TF

    . Swimmer's CT: improved imaging of the lower neck and thoracic inlet. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:859–62

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Hoang JK,
    3. Gafton AR,
    4. Eastwood JD, et al

    . Correlation of cross-sectional diameter with image quality and radiation exposure in MDCT examinations of the neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W904–09

    CrossRefPubMed