Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleBrain

Prediction of Glioma Recurrence Using Dynamic 18F-Fluoroethyltyrosine PET

T. Pyka, J. Gempt, F. Ringel, S. Hüttinger, S. van Marwick, S. Nekolla, H.-J. Wester, M. Schwaiger and S. Förster
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2014, 35 (10) 1924-1929; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3980
T. Pyka
aFrom the Departments of Nuclear Medicine (T.P., S.v.M., S.N., M.S., S.F)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Gempt
bNeurosurgery (J.G., F.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Ringel
bNeurosurgery (J.G., F.R.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Hüttinger
cNeuroradiology (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. van Marwick
aFrom the Departments of Nuclear Medicine (T.P., S.v.M., S.N., M.S., S.F)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Nekolla
aFrom the Departments of Nuclear Medicine (T.P., S.v.M., S.N., M.S., S.F)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.-J. Wester
dPharmaceutical Radiochemistry (H.-J.W.), Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Schwaiger
aFrom the Departments of Nuclear Medicine (T.P., S.v.M., S.N., M.S., S.F)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Förster
aFrom the Departments of Nuclear Medicine (T.P., S.v.M., S.N., M.S., S.F)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inter- and intratumor heterogeneity and the variable course of disease in patients with glioma motivate the investigation of new prognostic factors to optimize individual treatment. Here we explore the usefulness of standard static and more sophisticated dynamic 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine-PET imaging for the assessment of patient prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with untreated, first-diagnosed, histologically proved glioma were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent dynamic PET scans before surgery (± standard treatment) and were followed up clinically and by MR imaging. Static and dynamic tumor-to-background ratio, TTP, and slope-to-peak were obtained and correlated with progression-free survival.

RESULTS: Twenty of 34 patients experienced progression, with a median progression-free survival of 28.0 ± 11.1 months. Dynamic TTP was highly prognostic for recurrent disease, showing a strong correlation with progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 6.050; 95% CI, 2.11–17.37; P < .001). Most interesting, this correlation also proved significant in the subgroup of low-grade glioma (hazard ratio, 5.347; 95% CI, 1.05–27.20; P = .044), but not when using established static imaging parameters, such as maximum tumor-to-background ratio and mean tumor-to-background ratio. In the high-grade glioma subgroup, both dynamic and static parameters correlated with progression-free survival. The best results were achieved by defining ROIs around “hot spots” in earlier timeframes, underlining the concept of intratumor heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS: 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine-PET can predict recurrence in patients with glioma, with dynamic analysis showing advantages over static imaging, especially in the low-grade subgroup.

ABBREVIATIONS:

FET
18F-fluoroethyltyrosine
LGG
low-grade glioma
HGG
high-grade glioma
HR
hazard ratio
PFS
progression-free survival
ROC
receiver operating characteristic analysis
TBR
tumor-to-background ratio
  • © 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prediction of Glioma Recurrence Using Dynamic 18F-Fluoroethyltyrosine PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Pyka, J. Gempt, F. Ringel, S. Hüttinger, S. van Marwick, S. Nekolla, H.-J. Wester, M. Schwaiger, S. Förster
Prediction of Glioma Recurrence Using Dynamic 18F-Fluoroethyltyrosine PET
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2014, 35 (10) 1924-1929; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3980

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Prediction of Glioma Recurrence Using Dynamic 18F-Fluoroethyltyrosine PET
T. Pyka, J. Gempt, F. Ringel, S. Hüttinger, S. van Marwick, S. Nekolla, H.-J. Wester, M. Schwaiger, S. Förster
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2014, 35 (10) 1924-1929; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3980
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnostic Performance of PET and Perfusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Tumor Recurrence or Progression from Radiation Necrosis in Posttreatment Gliomas: A Review of Literature
  • A Simple Automated Method for Detecting Recurrence in High-Grade Glioma
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire