Whole-Brain Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Correlation to Visual-Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis: A Tract-Based Spatial Statistics Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Ciccarelli O,
   3. Toosy AT,
   4. Hickman SJ, et al

   . Optic radiation changes after optic neuritis detected by tractography-based group mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2005;25:308–16

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Vigeveno RM,
   3. Wiebenga OT,
   4. Wattjes MP, et al

   . Shifting imaging targets in multiple sclerosis: from inflammation to neurodegeneration. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:1–19

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Filippi M,
   3. Rocca MA,
   4. De Stefano N, et al

   . Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis: the present and the future. Arch Neurol 2011;68:1514–20

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Budde MD,
   3. Xie M,
   4. Cross AH, et al

   . Axial diffusivity is the primary correlate of axonal injury in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis spinal cord: a quantitative pixelwise analysis. J Neurosci 2009;29:2805–13

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Song SK,
   3. Yoshino J,
   4. Le TQ, et al

   . Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage 2005;26:132–40

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Halliday AM,
   3. McDonald WI,
   4. Mushin J

   . Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J 1973;4:661–64

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Lascano AM,
   3. Brodbeck V,
   4. Lalive PH, et al

   . Increasing the diagnostic value of evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis by quantitative topographic analysis of multichannel recordings. J Clin Neurophysiol 2009;26:316–25

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Weinstock-Guttman B,
   3. Baier M,
   4. Stockton R, et al

   . Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials as a measure of visual pathway pathology in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003;9:529–34

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Benbadis SR,
   3. Lancman ME,
   4. Wolgamuth BR, et al

   . Value of full-field visual evoked potentials for retrochiasmal lesions. J Clin Neurophysiol 1996;13:507–10

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Plant GT,
    3. Kermode AG,
    4. Turano G, et al

    . Symptomatic retrochiasmal lesions in multiple sclerosis: clinical features, visual evoked potentials, and magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology 1992;42:68–76

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    2. Schlaeger R,
    3. D'Souza M,
    4. Schindler C, et al

    . Combined evoked potentials as markers and predictors of disability in early multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:406–10

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Kantorová E,
    3. Ziak P,
    4. Kurca E, et al

    . Visual evoked potential and magnetic resonance imaging are more effective markers of multiple sclerosis progression than laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:10

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Johansen-Berg H, et al

    . Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–505

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Duan Y,
    4. He Y, et al

    . Whole brain white matter changes revealed by multiple diffusion metrics in multiple sclerosis: a TBSS study. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2826–32

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Sbardella E,
    3. Petsas N,
    4. Tona F, et al

    . Assessing the correlation between grey and white matter damage with motor and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis patients. PloS One 2013;8:e63250

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Onu M,
    3. Roceanu A,
    4. Sboto-Frankenstein U, et al

    . Diffusion abnormality maps in demyelinating disease: correlations with clinical scores. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e386–91

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Klawiter EC,
    3. Schmidt RE,
    4. Trinkaus K, et al

    . Radial diffusivity predicts demyelination in ex vivo multiple sclerosis spinal cords. Neuroimage 2011;55:1454–60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Schmierer K,
    3. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    4. Boulby PA, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain. Neuromage 2007;35:467–77

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Duan Y,
    4. He Y, et al

    . A tract-based diffusion study of cerebral white matter in neuromyelitis optica reveals widespread pathological alterations. Mult Scler 2012;18:1013–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Rueda Lopes FC,
    3. Doring T,
    4. Martins C, et al

    . The role of demyelination in neuromyelitis optica damage: diffusion-tensor MR imaging study. Radiology 2012;263:235–42

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Roosendaal SD,
    3. Geurts JJ,
    4. Vrenken H, et al

    . Regional DTI differences in multiple sclerosis patients. Neuroimage 2009;44:1397–403

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Kolbe SC,
    3. Marriott M,
    4. Walt Av, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging correlates of visual impairment in multiple sclerosis and chronic optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:825–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Jasse L,
    3. Vukusic S,
    4. Durand-Dubief F, et al

    . Persistent visual impairment in multiple sclerosis: prevalence, mechanisms and resulting disability. Mult Scler 2013;19:1618–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Kern KC,
    3. Ekstrom AD,
    4. Suthana NA, et al

    . Fornix damage limits verbal memory functional compensation in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2012;59:2932–40

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Gaffan EA,
    3. Bannerman DM,
    4. Warburton EC, et al

    . Rats' processing of visual scenes: effects of lesions to fornix, anterior thalamus, mamillary nuclei or the retrohippocampal region. Behav Brain Res 2001;121:103–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Thomas AG,
    3. Koumellis P,
    4. Dineen RA

    . The fornix in health and disease: an imaging review. Radiographics 2011;31:1107–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Minagar A,
    3. Barnett MH,
    4. Benedict RH, et al

    . The thalamus and multiple sclerosis: modern views on pathologic, imaging, and clinical aspects. Neurology 2013;80:210–19

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    2. Schoonheim MM,
    3. Vigeveno RM,
    4. Rueda Lopes FC, et al

    . Sex-specific extent and severity of white matter damage in multiple sclerosis: implications for cognitive decline. Hum Brain Mapp 2014;35:2348–58

    CrossRefPubMed