Carotid CTA: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality with the Use of Attenuation-Based, Automated Kilovolt Selection

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Brott TG,
   2. Halperin JL,
   3. Abbara S,
   4. et al

   . 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery, developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:e16–94

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Berrington de Gonzalez A,
   2. Mahesh M,
   3. Kim KP,
   4. et al

   . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–77

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Kuefner MA,
   2. Grudzenski S,
   3. Schwab SA,
   4. et al

   . DNA double-strand breaks and their repair in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. Invest Radiol 2009;44:440–46

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Brenner DJ,
   2. Hall EJ

   . Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Narvid J,
   2. Do HM,
   3. Blevins NH,
   4. et al

   . CT angiography as a screening tool for dural arteriovenous fistula in patients with pulsatile tinnitus: feasibility and test characteristics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:446–53

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. van Gils MJ,
   2. Vukadinovic D,
   3. van Dijk AC,
   4. et al

   . Carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression and change in plaque composition over time: a 5-year follow-up study using serial CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1267–73

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Lobrich M,
   2. Rief N,
   3. Kuhne M,
   4. et al

   . In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:8984–89

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Coakley FV,
   2. Gould R,
   3. Yeh BM,
   4. et al

   . CT radiation dose: what can you do right now in your practice? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:619–25

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Kalender WA,
   2. Buchenau S,
   3. Deak P,
   4. et al

   . Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. Phys Med 2008;24:71–79

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Kalra MK,
    2. Maher MM,
    3. Toth TL,
    4. et al

    . Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Manninen AL,
    2. Isokangas JM,
    3. Karttunen A,
    4. et al

    . A comparison of radiation exposure between diagnostic CTA and DSA examinations of cerebral and cervicocerebral vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2038–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Soderberg M,
    2. Gunnarsson M

    . Automatic exposure control in computed tomography: an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiol 2010;51:625–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. van Straten M,
    2. Deak P,
    3. Shrimpton PC,
    4. et al

    . The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 2009;36:4881–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Bittencourt MS,
    2. Schmidt B,
    3. Seltmann M,
    4. et al

    . Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27:1081–87

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Leipsic J,
    2. Heilbron BG,
    3. Hague C

    . Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:613–20

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Haberland U,
    2. Klotz E,
    3. Abolmaali N

    . Performance assessment of dynamic spiral scan modes with variable pitch for quantitative perfusion computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2010;45:378–86

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Singh S,
    2. Kalra MK,
    3. Moore MA,
    4. et al

    . Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 2009;252:200–08

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Kalender WA,
    2. Deak P,
    3. Kellermeier M,
    4. et al

    . Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. Med Phys 2009;36:993–1007

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Bjorkdahl P,
    2. Nyman U

    . Using 100- instead of 120-kVp computed tomography to diagnose pulmonary embolism almost halves the radiation dose with preserved diagnostic quality. Acta Radiol 2010;51:260–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Eller A,
    2. May MS,
    3. Scharf M,
    4. et al

    . Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt selection in abdominal computed tomography: effects on radiation exposure and image quality. Invest Radiol 2012;47:559–65

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Matsuoka S,
    2. Hunsaker AR,
    3. Gill RR,
    4. et al

    . Vascular enhancement and image quality of MDCT pulmonary angiography in 400 cases: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1651–56

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Schindera ST,
    2. Graca P,
    3. Patak MA,
    4. et al

    . Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Invest Radiol 2009;44:650–55

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Wildberger JE,
    2. Mahnken AH,
    3. Schmitz-Rode T,
    4. et al

    . Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure in chest CT. Invest Radiol 2001;36:604–11

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Winklehner A,
    2. Goetti R,
    3. Baumueller S,
    4. et al

    . Automated attenuation-based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography: improved dose effectiveness. Invest Radiol 2011;46:767–73

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Ramgren B,
    2. Bjorkman-Burtscher IM,
    3. Holtas S,
    4. et al

    . CT angiography of intracranial arterial vessels: impact of tube voltage and contrast media concentration on image quality. Acta Radiol 2012;53:929–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Marin D,
    2. Nelson RC,
    3. Samei E,
    4. et al

    . Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multidetector CT during late hepatic arterial phase for detection: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2009;251:771–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Ramgren B,
    2. Bjorkman-Burtscher IM,
    3. Holtas S,
    4. et al

    . CT angiography of intracranial arterial vessels: impact of tube voltage and contrast media concentration on image quality. Acta Radiol 2012;53:929–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Beitzke D,
    2. Wolf F,
    3. Edelhauser G,
    4. et al

    . Computed tomography angiography of the carotid arteries at low kV settings: a prospective randomised trial assessing radiation dose and diagnostic confidence. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2434–44

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Byrnes KR,
    2. Ross CB

    . The current role of carotid duplex ultrasonography in the management of carotid atherosclerosis: foundations and advances. Int J Vasc Med 2012 Mar 7 [Epub ahead of print]
30. 30.↵
    1. Babiarz LS,
    2. Romero JM,
    3. Murphy EK,
    4. et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining ≥70% internal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:761–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Anzidei M,
    2. Napoli A,
    3. Zaccagna F,
    4. et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients. Radiol Med 2012;117:54–71

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Alkadhi H,
    2. Leschka S

    . Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography: what has been achieved and what needs to be done. Eur Radiol 2011;21:505–09

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Kim JE,
    2. Newman B

    . Evaluation of a radiation dose reduction strategy for pediatric chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1188–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. McCollough CH,
    2. Bruesewitz MR,
    3. Kofler JM Jr.

    . CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 2006;26:503–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Silva AC,
    2. Lawder HJ,
    3. Hara A,
    4. et al

    . Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:191–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Bae KT

    . Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 2010;256:32–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Hou Y,
    2. Xu S,
    3. Guo W,
    4. et al

    . The optimal dose reduction level using iterative reconstruction with prospective ECG-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MDCT. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3905–11

    CrossRefPubMed