Raise the Bar and Lower the Dose: Current and Future Strategies for Radiation Dose Reduction in Head and Neck Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Shope TB,
   2. Gagne RM,
   3. Johnson GC

   . A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 1981;8:488–95

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Bauhs JA,
   2. Vrieze TJ,
   3. Primak AN,
   4. et al

   . CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics 2008;28:245–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Feigal DW Jr.

   . FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. Int J Trauma Nurs 2002;8:1–2

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. McNitt-Gray MF

   . AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT—radiation dose in CT. Radiographics 2002;22:1541–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Schindera ST,
   2. Nelson RC,
   3. Yoshizumi T,
   4. et al

   ., Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. Acad Radiol 2009;16:997–1002

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Huda W,
   2. Scalzetti EM,
   3. Levin G

   . Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 2000;217:430–35

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Mulkens TH,
   2. Marchal P,
   3. Daineffe S,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1444–50

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB,
   2. Hennequin R,
   3. Abada HT,
   4. et al

   ., Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 2004;231:169–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Waaijer A,
   2. Prokop M,
   3. Velthuis BK,
   4. et al

   . Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality—reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings. Radiology 2007;242:832–39

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Matsuoka S,
    2. Hunsaker AR,
    3. Gill RR,
    4. et al

    . Vascular enhancement and image quality of MDCT pulmonary angiography in 400 cases: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1651–56

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kalra MK,
    2. Maher MM,
    3. Toth TL,
    4. et al

    . Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Primak AN,
    2. McCollough CH,
    3. Bruesewitz MR,
    4. et al

    . Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 2006;26:1785–94

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. McNitt-Gray MF,
    2. Cagnon CH,
    3. Solberg TD,
    4. et al

    . Radiation dose in spiral CT: the relative effects of collimation and pitch. Med Phys 1999;26:409–14

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Mahesh M,
    2. Scatarige JC,
    3. Cooper J,
    4. et al

    . Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1273–75

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Lee CH,
    2. Goo JM,
    3. Ye HJ,
    4. et al

    . Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 2008;28:1451–59

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Russell MT,
    2. Fink JR,
    3. Rebeles F,
    4. et al

    . Balancing radiation dose and image quality: clinical applications of neck volume CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:727–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Lee EJ,
    2. Lee SK,
    3. Agid R,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube current and combined automatic tube current modulation in craniocervical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1754–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Mulkens TH,
    2. Bellinck P,
    3. Baeyaert M,
    4. et al

    . Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 2005;237:213–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Tzedakis A,
    2. Damilakis J,
    3. Perisinakis K,
    4. et al

    . The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Med Phys 2005;32:1621–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Christner JA,
    2. Zavaletta VA,
    3. Eusemann CD,
    4. et al

    . Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis x-ray beam collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W49–55

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Mahesh M,
    3. Tsui BM

    . Is iterative reconstruction ready for MDCT? J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:274–76

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Yoo RE,
    2. Park EA,
    3. Lee W,
    4. et al

    . Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012 Aug 26. [Epub ahead of print]
23. 23.↵
    1. Silva AC,
    2. Lawder HJ,
    3. Hara A,
    4. et al

    . Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:191–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Kilic K,
    2. Erbas G,
    3. Guryildirim M,
    4. et al

    . Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1578–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Hoang JK,
    2. Yoshizumi TT,
    3. Choudhury KR,
    4. et al

    . Organ-based dose current modulation and thyroid shields: techniques of radiation dose reduction for neck CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198;1132–38

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Vollmar SV,
    2. Kalender WA

    . Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: a comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1674–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Katsura M,
    2. Matsuda I,
    3. Akahane M,
    4. et al

    . Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1613–23

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Yu L,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Leng S,
    4. et al

    . Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 2009;1:65–84

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Szucs-Farkas Z,
    2. Bensler S,
    3. Torrente JC,
    4. et al

    . Nonlinear three-dimensional noise filter with low-dose CT angiography: effect on the detection of small high-contrast objects in a phantom model. Radiology 2011;258:261–69

    CrossRefPubMed