Guidelines for the Ethical Use of Neuroimages in Medical Testimony: Report of a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kraus M,
   2. Susmaras T,
   3. Caughlin B,
   4. et al

   . White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain 2007;130:2508–19

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Mohamed F,
   2. Faro S,
   3. Gordon N,
   4. et al

   . Mapping of deception and truth telling about an ecologically valid situation: functional MR imaging and polygraph investigation—initial experience. Radiology 2006;238:679–88

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Karim A,
   2. Schneider M,
   3. Lotze M,
   4. et al

   . The truth about lying: inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior. Cerebral Cortex 2010;20:205–13

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Jukuri T,
   2. Kiviniemi V,
   3. Nikkinen J,
   4. et al

   . Default mode network in young people with familial risk for psychosis: the Oulu Brain and Mind Study. Schizophr Res 2013;143:239–45

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Woodward N,
   2. Karbasforoushan H,
   3. Heckers S

   . Thalamocortical dysconnectivity in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2012;169:1092–99

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Korgaonkar M,
   2. Grieve S,
   3. Etkin A,
   4. et al

   . Using standardized fMRI protocols to identify patterns of prefrontal circuit dysregulation that are common and specific to cognitive and emotional tasks in major depressive disorder: first wave results from the iSPOT-D Study. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38:863–71

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Sato J,
   2. de Araujo Filho G,
   3. de Araujo T,
   4. et al

   . Can neuroimaging be used as a support to diagnosis of borderline personality disorder? An approach based on computational neuroanatomy and machine learning. J Psychiatr Res 2012;46:1126–32

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Anderson JS,
   2. Ferguson M,
   3. Lopez-Larson M,
   4. et al

   . Reproducibility of single-subject functional connectivity measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:548–55

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Jovicicha J,
   2. Czannera S,
   3. Grevea D,
   4. et al

   . Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage 2006;30:436–43

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Moriarty J

    . Flickering admissibility: neuroimaging evidence in the U.S. courts. Behav Sci Law 2008;26:29–49

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. McCabe D,
    2. Castel A

    . Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition 2008;107:343–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Weisberg DS,
    2. Keil FC,
    3. Goodstein J,
    4. et al

    . The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci 2008;20:470–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    Ethical clinical practice of functional brain imaging: Society of Nuclear Medicine Brain Imaging Council. J Nucl Med 1996;37:1256–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    ACR Practice Guideline on the Physician Expert Witness in Radiology and Radiation Oncology. Revised 2012. http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Expert_Witness.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2012
15. 15.↵
    1. Janower M,
    2. Hoffman T

    . An overview of the ACR Committee on Ethics: from hospital contracts to expert witness testimony. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2:424–27

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation: Committee on Medical Liability—American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2002;109:974–79

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Maggiore W,
    2. Kupas D,
    3. Glushak C

    . Expert witness qualifications and ethical guidelines for emergency medical services litigation: resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care 2011;15:426–31

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Feld A,
    2. Carey W

    . Expert witness malfeasance: how should societies respond? Am J Gastronenterol 2005;100:991–95

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    1. Kulich R,
    2. Maciewicz R,
    3. Scrivani S

    . Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and expert testimony. Pain Med 2009;10:373–80

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    Austin v American Association of Neurologic Surgeons, Lexis 12143 (US App 7th Cir 2001)
21. 21.↵
    1. Berlin L,
    2. Hoffman T,
    3. Shields W,
    4. et al

    . When does expert witness testimony constitute a violation of the ACR Code of Ethics? The role of the ACR Committee on Ethics. J Am Coll Radiol 2006;3:252–58

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Berlin L,
    2. Williams D

    . When an expert witness is not an expert. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1215–19

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Williams M,
    2. Mackin G,
    3. Beresford H,
    4. et al

    . American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness. Neurology 2006;66:13–14

    CrossRef
24. 24.↵
    1. Lindberg DM,
    2. Lindsell CJ,
    3. Shapiro RA

    . Variability in expert assessments of child physical abuse likelihood. Pediatrics 2008;121:e945–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Hugh T,
    2. Dekker S

    . Hindsight bias and outcome bias in the social construction of medical negligence: a review. J Law Med 2009;16:846–57

    PubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Vohs K,
    2. Mead N,
    3. Goode M

    . The psychological consequences of money. Science 2006;314:1154

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Konrad KA,
    2. Morath F

    . Evolutionarily stable in-group favoritism and out-group spite in intergroup conflict. J Theor Biol 2012;306:61–67

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Nakamura M,
    2. Masuda N

    . Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity. BMC Evol Biol 2012;12:213

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Kesselheim A,
    2. Studdert D

    . Characteristics of physicians who frequently act as expert witnesses in neurologic birth injury litigation. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:273–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Shore S

    . Is the medical witness a legal advocate? Med Trial Tech Q 1971;18:121–23

    PubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Ganis G,
    2. Rosenfeld J,
    3. Meixner J,
    4. et al

    . Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2011;55:312–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    fMRI Evidence Used in Murder Sentencing. 2009. ScienceInsider. http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2009/11/fmri-evidence-u.html. Accessed November 26, 2012
33. 33.↵
    1. Feigl GC,
    2. Hiergeist W,
    3. Fellner C,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging diffusion tensor tractography: evaluation of anatomical accuracy of different fiber tracking software packages. World Neurosurg 2013;pii:S1878–8750(13)00011–19
34. 34.↵
    1. Brown T,
    2. Murphy E

    . Through a scanner darkly: functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states. Stanford Law Rev 2010;62:1119–208

    PubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Vernooij M,
    2. Ikram M,
    3. Tanghe H,
    4. et al

    . Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1821–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Henderson C,
    2. Epstein J

    1. Morse S

    . The future of neuroscientific evidence. In: Henderson C, Epstein J , eds. The Future of Evidence How Science and Technology will Change the Practice of Law. Chicago: American Bar Association; 2011:137–63
37. 37.↵
    1. Morse S

    . Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: a diagnostic note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2006;3:397–412
38. 38.↵
    1. Carter Snead O

    . Neuroimaging and the “complexity” of capital punishment. New York University Law Review 2007;82:1265–339

    Web of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Johnson S,
    2. Blum R,
    3. Giedd J

    . Adolescent maturity and the brain: the promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. J Adolesc Health 2009;45:216–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    1. DeKosky S,
    2. Ikonomovic M,
    3. Gandy S

    . Traumatic brain injury: football, warfare, and long-term effects. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1293–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Arfanakis K,
    2. Haughton V,
    3. Carew J,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:794–802

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Bazarian J,
    2. Zhong J,
    3. Blyth B,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging detects clinically important axonal damage after mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:1447–59

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Lange R,
    2. Iverson G,
    3. Brubacher J,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging findings are not strongly associated with postconcussional disorder 2 months following mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2012;27:188–98

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Levin H,
    2. Wilde E,
    3. Troyanskaya M,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of mild to moderate blast-related traumatic brain injury and its sequelae. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:683–94

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. White T,
    2. Nelson M,
    3. Lim K

    . Diffusion tensor imaging in psychiatric disorders. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008;19:97–109

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Field A,
    2. Filippi C,
    3. Kalnin A,
    4. et al

    . ASFNR Guidelines for Clinical Application of Diffusion Tensor Imaging. American Society of Functional Neuroradiology. 2012:5. http://www.asfnr.org/docs/ASFNR_Guidelines–for-DTI.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2012
47. 47.↵
    1. Katzman G,
    2. Dagher A,
    3. Patronas N

    . Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 1999;281:36–39

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Bruce D,
    2. Zimmerman R

    . Shaken impact syndrome. Pediatr Ann 1989;18:482–84, 486

    PubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Findley KA,
    2. Barnes PD,
    3. Moran DA,
    4. et al

    . Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: getting it right. Houston Journal of Health and Policy 2012;Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1195
50. 50.↵
    1. Barnes P

    1. Barnes P

    . Ethical issues in imaging nonaccidental injury: child abuse. In: Barnes P , ed. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Nonaccidental Central Nervous System Injury. Vol. 13. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:85–94
51. 51.↵
    1. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T,
    2. Boos S,
    3. Spivack B,
    4. et al

    . Abusive head trauma. Part II. Radiological aspects. Eur J Pediatr 2012;171:617–23

    CrossRefPubMed