Attitudes about Medical Malpractice: An American Society of Neuroradiology Survey

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Jena AB,
   2. Chandra A,
   3. Lakdawalla D,
   4. et al

   . Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:892–94

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Jena AB,
   2. Seabury S,
   3. Lakdawalla D,
   4. et al

   . Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med 2011;365:629–36

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   Claim Trend Analysis: A Comprehensive Analysis of Medical Malpractice Data Reported to the PIAA Data Sharing Project. Physician Insurers Association of America, Rockville, Maryland. 2004
4. 4.↵
   1. Whang JS,
   2. Baker SR,
   3. Patel R,
   4. et al

   . The causes of medical malpractice suits against radiologists in the United States. Radiology 2013;266:548–44

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Thomson NB 3rd.,
   2. Patel M

   . Radiology liability update: review of claims, trends, high-risk conditions and practices, and tort reform alternatives. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:729–33

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Baker SR,
   2. Whang JS,
   3. Luk L,
   4. et al

   . The demography of medical malpractice suits against radiologists. Radiology 2013;266:539–47

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Studdert DM,
   2. Mello MM,
   3. Gawande AA,
   4. et al

   . Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2024–33

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Fileni A,
   2. Magnavita N,
   3. Mammi F,
   4. et al

   . Malpractice stress syndrome in radiologists and radiotherapists: perceived causes and consequences. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007;112:1069–84

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Kahneman D,
   2. Tversky A

   . Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47:263

   CrossRefWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Lawthers AG,
    2. Laird NM,
    3. Lipsitz S,
    4. et al

    . Physicians' perceptions of the risk of being sued. J Health Polit Policy Law 1992;17:463–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text