Endovascular Treatment of 300 Consecutive Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Ausman JI

   . The future of neurovascular surgery. Part I: Intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 1997;48:98–100

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Regli L Uske A,
   2. de Tribolet N

   . Endovascular coil placement compared with surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a consecutive series. J Neurosurg 1999;90:1025–30

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Rodríguez-Hernández A,
   2. Sughrue ME,
   3. Akhavan S,
   4. et al

   . Current management of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: surgical results with a “clip first” policy. Neurosurgery 2013;72:415–27

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Choi SW,
   2. Ahn JS,
   3. Park JC,
   4. et al

   . Surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial middle cerebral artery aneurysms: angiographic and clinical outcomes in 143 aneurysms. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2012;14:289–94

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Morgan MK,
   2. Mahattanakul W,
   3. Davidson A,
   4. et al

   . Outcome for middle cerebral artery aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery 2010;67:755–61

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. van Dijk JM,
   2. Groen RJ,
   3. Ter Laan M,
   4. et al

   . Surgical clipping as the preferred treatment for aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:2111–17

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Anxionnat R,
   4. et al

   . Results of embolization used as the first treatment choice in a consecutive nonselected population of ruptured aneurysms: clinical results of the Clarity GDC Study. Neurosurgery 2011;69:837–41

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Iijima A,
    2. Piotin M,
    3. Mounayer C,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment with coils of 149 middle cerebral artery berry aneurysms. Radiology 2005;237:611–19

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Quadros RS,
    2. Gallas S,
    3. Noudel R,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms as first option: a single center experience of 92 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1567–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Suzuki S,
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with detachable coils: angiographic and clinical outcomes in 115 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2009;64:876–88; discussion 888–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Bracard S,
    2. Abdel-Kerim A,
    3. Thuillier L,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular coil occlusion of 152 middle cerebral artery aneurysms: initial and midterm angiographic and clinical results. J Neurosurg 2010;112:703–08

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Oishi H,
    2. Yoshida K,
    3. Shimizu T,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment with bare platinum coils for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2009;49:287–93

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Renowden SA,
    2. Benes V,
    3. Bradley M,
    4. et al

    . Detachable coil embolisation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single center study, a decade experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009;111:179–88

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Kassell NF,
    2. Torner JC,
    3. Haley EC,
    4. et al

    . The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1: Overall management results. J Neurosurg 1990;73:18–36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Rinne J,
    2. Hernesniemi J,
    3. Niskanen M,
    4. et al

    . Analysis of 561 patients with 690 middle cerebral artery aneurysms: anatomic and clinical features as correlated to management outcome. Neurosurgery 1996;38:2–11

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Güresir E,
    2. Schuss P,
    3. Berkefeld J,
    4. et al

    . Treatment results for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms. A prospective single-center series. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1247–52

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Houkin K,
    2. Kuroda S,
    3. Takahashi A,
    4. et al

    . Intra-operative premature rupture of the cerebral aneurysms. Analysis of the causes and management. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:1255–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Yundt KD,
    2. Grubb RL Jr.,
    3. Diringer MN,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic changes caused by brain retraction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1997;40:442–50

    PubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Tawk RG,
    2. Pandey A,
    3. Levy E,
    4. et al

    . Coiling of ruptured aneurysms followed by evacuation of hematoma. World Neurosurg 2010;74:626–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and single-center series. Neurosurgery 2011;68:397–402; discussion 402

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Vitry F,
    4. et al

    . Immediate anatomic results after the endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: analysis of the ATENA series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:140–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Ricolfi F,
    4. et al

    . Immediate anatomic results after the endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: analysis in the CLARITY series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:907–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Anxionnat R,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting midterm quality anatomic results: analysis in a prospective, multicenter series of patients (CLARITY). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1475–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Johnson AK,
    2. Heiferman DM,
    3. Lopes DK

    . Stent-assisted embolization of 100 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2013;118:950–55

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Vendrell JF,
    2. Costalat V,
    3. Brunel H,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms: initial and midterm results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:259–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al

    . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. et al

    . Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:12–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Anxionnat R,
    4. et al

    . Remodelling technique for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate postoperative occlusion than did conventional coil embolization with comparable safety. Radiology 2011;258:546–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Leclerc X,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of safety of remodeling technique and standard treatment with coils. Radiology 2009;251:846–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Vendrell JF,
    2. Menjot N,
    3. Costalat V,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of 174 middle cerebral artery aneurysms: clinical outcome and radiologic results at long-term follow-up. Radiology 2009;253:191–98

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Singhal S,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Fields JD,
    2. Brambrink L,
    3. Dogan A,
    4. et al

    . Stent assisted coil embolization of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:15–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Cognard C,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular WEB flow disruption in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: preliminary feasibility, clinical, and anatomical results in a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2013;73:27–34; discussion 34–35

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. McDonald JS,
    2. Carter RE,
    3. Layton KF,
    4. et al

    . Interobserver variability in retreatment decisions of recurrent and residual aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1035–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Renowden SA,
    2. Koumellis P,
    3. Benes V,
    4. et al

    . Retreatment of previously embolized cerebral aneurysms: the risk of further coil embolization does not negate the advantage of the initial embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1401–04

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Campi A,
    2. Ramzi N,
    3. Molyneux AJ,
    4. et al

    . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Birks J,
    4. et al

    . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Zabramski JM,
    4. et al

    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Clarke A,
    3. Sneade M,
    4. et al

    . Cerecyte Coil Trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either Cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke 2012;43:2544–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Lewis SC,
    3. Gholkar A,
    4. et al

    . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;14:377:1655–62
45. 45.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Vitry F,
    4. et al

    . Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497–504

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Anxionnat R,
    4. et al

    . Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting the rate and outcome of endovascular treatment complications in a series of 782 patients (CLARITY study). Radiology 2010;256:916–23

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. McDonald JS,
    2. McDonald RJ,
    3. Fan J,
    4. et al

    . Comparative effectiveness of ruptured cerebral aneurysm therapies: propensity score analysis of clipping versus coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013 Jul 18 [Epub ahead of print]
48. 48.↵
    1. Taki W,
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Suzuki H,
    4. et al

    . Determinants of poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage when both clipping and coiling are available: Prospective Registry of Subarachnoid Aneurysms Treatment (PRESAT) in Japan. World Neurosurg 2011;76:437–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Hart Y,
    2. Sneade M,
    3. Birks J,
    4. et al

    . Epilepsy after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the frequency of seizures after clip occlusion or coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm: results from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. Neurosurg 2011;115:1159–68

    CrossRef
50. 50.↵
    1. Wiebers DO,
    2. Whisnant JP,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. et al

    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Moroi J,
    2. Hadeishi H,
    3. Suzuki A,
    4. et al

    . Morbidity and mortality from surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms at Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels-Akita. Neurosurgery 2005;56:224–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    1. Higashida RT,
    2. Lahue BJ,
    3. Torbey MT,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:146–51

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. 53.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. et al

    . Effect of age on outcomes of treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001–2008. Stroke 2011;42:1320–24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text