Counterpoint—Response to “In Memoriam: The Matrix Coil”

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Clarke A,
   3. Sneade M,
   4. et al

   . Cerecyte coil trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke 2012;43:2544–50

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. White PM,
   2. Lewis SC,
   3. Nahser H,
   4. Sellar RJ,
   5. Goddard T,
   6. Gholkar A

   . HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:217–23

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Bouzeghrane F,
   2. Naggara O,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. et al

   . In vivo experimental intracranial aneurysm models: a systematic review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:418–23

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Mawad ME,
   2. Mawad JK,
   3. Cartwright J,
   4. et al

   . Long-term histopathological changes in canine aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:7–13

   Abstract
5. 5.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Metcalfe A,
   4. et al

   . Role of the endothelial lining in recurrences after coil embolization: prevention of recanalization by endothelial denudation. Stroke 2004;35:1471–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Leblanc P,
   3. Morel F,
   4. et al

   . Beta radiation and inhibition of recanalization after coil embolization of canine arteries and experimental aneurysms: how should radiation be delivered? Stroke 2003;34:1262–68

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Reul J,
   2. Weis J,
   3. Spetzger U,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic and histopathologic findings in experimental aneurysms of the carotid bifurcation embolized with platinum and tungsten coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:35–42

   Abstract
8. 8.↵
   1. Strother CM,
   2. Graves VB,
   3. Rappe AA

   . Aneurysm hemodynamics: an experimental model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:1089–95

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Turk AS,
   2. Aagaard-Kienitz B,
   3. Niemann DB,
   4. et al

   . Natural history of the canine vein pouch aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:531–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Luty CM,
    3. Carr-Brendel V,
    4. et al

    . Angiographic and histological comparison of canine bifurcation aneurysms treated with first generation Matrix and standard GDC coils. Neuroradiology 2008;50:57–65

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Claiborne Johnston S,
    3. Gholkar A,
    4. et al

    . Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:935–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Fargen KM,
    2. Frei D,
    3. Fiorella D,
    4. et al

    . The FDA approval process for medical devices: an inherently flawed system or a valuable pathway for innovation? J Surg 2013;5:269–75