Multivariate Classification of Blood Oxygen Level–Dependent fMRI Data with Diagnostic Intention: A Clinical Perspective

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Huettel SA,
   2. Song AW,
   3. McCarthy G

   . Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates; 2009
2. 2.↵
   1. Zhang D,
   2. Raichle ME

   . Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6:15–28

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Chen CH,
   2. Suckling J,
   3. Lennox BR,
   4. et al

   . A quantitative meta-analysis of fMRI studies in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2011;13:1–15
4. 4.↵
   1. Bartsch AJ,
   2. Homola G,
   3. Biller A,
   4. et al

   . Diagnostic functional MRI: illustrated clinical applications and decision-making. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:921–32

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Pillai JJ

   . The evolution of clinical functional imaging during the past 2 decades and its current impact on neurosurgical planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:219–25

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Gruber O

   . Neuroimaging markers: their role for differential diagnosis and therapeutic decisions in personalized psychiatry [in German]. Nervenarzt 2011;82:1404, 406, 408

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Linden DE

   . The challenges and promise of neuroimaging in psychiatry. Neuron 2012;73:8–22

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Oertel-Knöchel V,
   2. Bittner RA,
   3. Knochel C,
   4. et al

   . Discovery and development of integrative biological markers for schizophrenia. Prog Neurobiol 2011;95:686–702

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Mössner R,
   2. Mikova O,
   3. Koutsilieri E,
   4. et al

   . Consensus paper of the WFSBP task force on biological markers: biological markers in depression. World J Biol Psychiatry 2007;8:141–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Hampel H,
    2. Lista S,
    3. Khachaturian ZS

    . Development of biomarkers to chart all Alzheimer's disease stages: the royal road to cutting the therapeutic gordian knot. Alzheimers Dement 2012;8:312–36

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Hyman SE

    . Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:725–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. de Souza LC,
    2. Lehericy S,
    3. Dubois B,
    4. et al

    . Neuroimaging in dementias. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2012;25:473–79

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Jack CR Jr.

    . Alzheimer disease: new concepts on its neurobiology and the clinical role imaging will play. Radiology 2012;263:344–61

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Mueller S,
    2. Wang D,
    3. Fox MD,
    4. et al

    . Individual variability in functional connectivity architecture of the human brain. Neuron 2013;77:586–95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Raemaekers M,
    2. du Plessis S,
    3. Ramsey NF,
    4. et al

    . Test-retest variability underlying fMRI measurements. Neuroimage 2012;60:717–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Shehzad Z,
    2. Kelly AM,
    3. Reiss PT,
    4. et al

    . The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. Cereb Cortex 2009;19:2209–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Nichols TE

    . Multiple testing corrections, nonparametric methods, and random field theory. Neuroimage 2012;62:811–15

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Norman KA,
    2. Polyn SM,
    3. Detre GJ,
    4. et al

    . Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends Cogn Sci 2006;10:424–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Pereira F,
    2. Mitchell T,
    3. Botvinick M

    . Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview. Neuroimage 2009;45:S199–209

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Haynes JD,
    2. Rees G

    . Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006;7:523–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Klöppel S,
    2. Abdulkadir A,
    3. Jack CR Jr.,
    4. et al

    . Diagnostic neuroimaging across diseases. Neuroimage 2012;61:457–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Orrù G,
    2. Pettersson-Yeo W,
    3. Marquand AF,
    4. et al

    . Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36:1140–52

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Alpaydin E

    . Introduction to Machine Learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2010
24. 24.↵
    1. Vapnik VN

    . The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000
25. 25.↵
    1. Derrfuss J,
    2. Brass M,
    3. von Cramon DY,
    4. et al

    . Neural activations at the junction of the inferior frontal sulcus and the inferior precentral sulcus: interindividual variability, reliability, and association with sulcal morphology. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:299–311

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Ellis R,
    2. Peters T

    1. Ford J,
    2. Farid H,
    3. Makedon F,
    4. et al

    . Patient classification of fMRI activation maps. In: Ellis R, Peters T, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2879. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2003:58
27. 27.↵
    1. Barillot C,
    2. Haynor DR,
    3. Hellier P

    1. Kontos D,
    2. Megalooikonomou V,
    3. Pokrajac D,
    4. et al

    . Extraction of discriminative functional MRI activation patterns and an application to Alzheimer's disease. In: Barillot C, Haynor DR, Hellier P, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3217. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. 2004;727–35
28. 28.↵
    1. Bogorodzki P,
    2. Rogowska J,
    3. Yurgelun-Todd DA

    . Structural group classification technique based on regional fMRI BOLD responses. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:389–98

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Samaras D,
    3. Tomasi D,
    4. et al

    . Exploiting temporal information in functional magnetic resonance imaging brain data. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005;8:679–87

    PubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Shinkareva SV,
    2. Ombao HC,
    3. Sutton BP,
    4. et al

    . Classification of functional brain images with a spatio-temporal dissimilarity map. Neuroimage 2006;33:63–71

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Chen R,
    2. Herskovits EH

    . Clinical diagnosis based on bayesian classification of functional magnetic-resonance data. Neuroinformatics 2007;5:178–88

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Calhoun VD,
    2. Maciejewski PK,
    3. Pearlson GD,
    4. et al

    . Temporal lobe and “default” hemodynamic brain modes discriminate between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:1265–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Demirci O,
    2. Clark VP,
    3. Calhoun VD

    . A projection pursuit algorithm to classify individuals using fMRI data: application to schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2008;39:1774–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Demirci O,
    2. Clark VP,
    3. Magnotta VA,
    4. et al

    . A review of challenges in the use of fMRI for disease classification/characterization and a projection pursuit application from multi-site fMRI schizophrenia study. Brain Imaging Behav 2008;2:147–226

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Fu CH,
    2. Mourão-Miranda J,
    3. Costafreda SG,
    4. et al

    . Pattern classification of sad facial processing: toward the development of neurobiological markers in depression. Biol Psychiatry 2008;63:656–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Marquand AF,
    2. Mourão-Miranda J,
    3. Brammer MJ,
    4. et al

    . Neuroanatomy of verbal working memory as a diagnostic biomarker for depression. Neuroreport 2008;19:1507–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Michael AM,
    2. Calhoun VD,
    3. Andreasen NC,
    4. et al

    . A method to classify schizophrenia using inter-task spatial correlations of functional brain images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008;2008:5510–13

    PubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Costafreda SG,
    2. Khanna A,
    3. Mourão-Miranda J,
    4. et al

    . Neural correlates of sad faces predict clinical remission to cognitive behavioural therapy in depression. Neuroreport 2009;20:637–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Arribas JI,
    2. Calhoun VD,
    3. Adali T

    . Automatic bayesian classification of healthy controls, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia using intrinsic connectivity maps from fMRI data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57:2850–60

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Saur D,
    2. Ronneberger O,
    3. Kummerer D,
    4. et al

    . Early functional magnetic resonance imaging activations predict language outcome after stroke. Brain 2010;133:1252–64

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Tripoliti EE,
    2. Fotiadis DI,
    3. Argyropoulou M,
    4. et al

    . A six stage approach for the diagnosis of the Alzheimer's disease based on fMRI data. J Biomed Inform 2010;43:307–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Yang H,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Sui J,
    4. et al

    . A hybrid machine learning method for fusing fMRI and genetic data: combining both improves classification of schizophrenia. Front Hum Neurosci 2010;4:192

    PubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Castro E,
    2. Martinez-Ramon M,
    3. Pearlson G,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of groups using composite kernels and multi-source fMRI analysis data: application to schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2011;58:526–36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Costafreda SG,
    2. Fu CH,
    3. Picchioni M,
    4. et al

    . Pattern of neural responses to verbal fluency shows diagnostic specificity for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2011;11:18

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Hahn T,
    2. Marquand AF,
    3. Ehlis AC,
    4. et al

    . Integrating neurobiological markers of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:361–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Hoeft F,
    2. McCandliss BD,
    3. Black JM,
    4. et al

    . Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:361–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Mourão-Miranda J,
    2. Hardoon DR,
    3. Hahn T,
    4. et al

    . Patient classification as an outlier detection problem: an application of the one-class support vector machine. Neuroimage 2011;58:793–804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    1. Nouretdinov I,
    2. Costafreda SG,
    3. Gammerman A,
    4. et al

    . Machine learning classification with confidence: application of transductive conformal predictors to MRI-based diagnostic and prognostic markers in depression. Neuroimage 2011;56:809–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Rizk-Jackson A,
    2. Stoffers D,
    3. Sheldon S,
    4. et al

    . Evaluating imaging biomarkers for neurodegeneration in pre-symptomatic Huntington's disease using machine learning techniques. Neuroimage 2011;56:788–96

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Tripoliti EE,
    2. Fotiadis DI,
    3. Argyropoulou M

    . A supervised method to assist the diagnosis and monitor progression of Alzheimer's disease using data from an fMRI experiment. Artif Intell Med 2011;53:35–45

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Weygandt M,
    2. Schaefer A,
    3. Schienle A,
    4. et al

    . Diagnosing different binge-eating disorders based on reward-related brain activation patterns. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:2135–46

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Abdulkadir A,
    2. Ronneberger O,
    3. Wolf RC,
    4. et al

    . Functional and structural MRI biomarkers to detect pre-clinical neurodegeneration. Curr Alzheimer Res 2013;10:125–34

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    1. Andersen AH,
    2. Rayens WS,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. et al

    . Partial least squares for discrimination in fMRI data. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:446–52

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Grotegerd D,
    2. Suslow T,
    3. Bauer J,
    4. et al

    . Discriminating unipolar and bipolar depression by means of fMRI and pattern classification: a pilot study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2013;63:119–31
55. 55.↵
    1. Du W,
    2. Calhoun VD,
    3. Li H,
    4. et al

    . High classification accuracy for schizophrenia with rest and task fMRI data. Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6:145

    PubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Mourão-Miranda J,
    2. Oliveira L,
    3. Ladouceur CD,
    4. et al

    . Pattern recognition and functional neuroimaging help to discriminate healthy adolescents at risk for mood disorders from low risk adolescents. PLoS One 2012;7:e29482

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Mourão-Miranda J,
    2. Almeida JR,
    3. Hassel S,
    4. et al

    . Pattern recognition analyses of brain activation elicited by happy and neutral faces in unipolar and bipolar depression. Bipolar Disord 2012;14:451–60

    CrossRef
58. 58.↵
    1. Nejad AB,
    2. Madsen KH,
    3. Ebdrup BH,
    4. et al

    . Neural markers of negative symptom outcomes in distributed working memory brain activity of antipsychotic-naive schizophrenia patients. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2013;16:1195–204

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    1. Ramezani M,
    2. Abolmaesumi P,
    3. Marble K,
    4. et al

    . Classification of individuals based on sparse representation of brain cognitive patterns: a functional MRI study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012;2012:2688–91

    PubMed
60. 60.↵
    1. Weygandt M,
    2. Blecker CR,
    3. Schafer A,
    4. et al

    . fMRI pattern recognition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuroimage 2012;60:1186–93

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    1. Yoon JH,
    2. Nguyen DV,
    3. McVay LM,
    4. et al

    . Automated classification of fMRI during cognitive control identifies more severely disorganized subjects with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2012;135:28–33

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Rish I,
    2. Cecchi G,
    3. Thyreau B,
    4. et al

    . Schizophrenia as a network disease: disruption of emergent brain function in patients with auditory hallucinations. PLoS One 2013;8:e50625

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Lee JH

    . Integration of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging improves mild cognitive impairment detection. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31:718–32

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    1. Jafri MJ,
    2. Calhoun VD

    . Functional classification of schizophrenia using feed forward neural networks. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006;(suppl):6631–34
65. 65.↵
    1. Wang K,
    2. Jiang T,
    3. Liang M,
    4. et al

    . Discriminative analysis of early Alzheimer's disease based on two intrinsically anti-correlated networks with resting-state fMRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006;9:340–47

    PubMed
66. 66.↵
    1. Shi F,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Jiang T,
    4. et al

    . Regional homogeneity and anatomical parcellation for fMRI image classification: application to schizophrenia and normal controls. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007;10(pt 2):136–43
67. 67.↵
    1. Zhu CZ,
    2. Zang YF,
    3. Cao QJ,
    4. et al

    . Fisher discriminative analysis of resting-state brain function for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuroimage 2008;40:110–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
68. 68.↵
    1. Craddock RC,
    2. Holtzheimer PE 3rd.,
    3. Hu XP,
    4. et al

    . Disease state prediction from resting state functional connectivity. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:1619–28

    CrossRefPubMed
69. 69.↵
    1. Supekar K,
    2. Musen M,
    3. Menon V

    . Development of large-scale functional brain networks in children. PLoS Biol 2009;7:e1000157

    CrossRefPubMed
70. 70.↵
    1. Shen H,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. et al

    . Discriminative analysis of resting-state functional connectivity patterns of schizophrenia using low dimensional embedding of fMRI. Neuroimage 2010;49:3110–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
71. 71.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Greicius MD,
    3. Gennatas ED,
    4. et al

    . Divergent network connectivity changes in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2010;133:1352–67

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
72. 72.↵
    1. Anderson JS,
    2. Nielsen JA,
    3. Froehlich AL,
    4. et al

    . Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging classification of autism. Brain 2011;134:3742–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
73. 73.↵
    1. Chen G,
    2. Ward BD,
    3. Xie C,
    4. et al

    . Classification of Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal cognitive status with large-scale network analysis based on resting-state functional MR imaging. Radiology 2011;259:213–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
74. 74.↵
    1. Fan Y,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Wu H,
    4. et al

    . Discriminant analysis of functional connectivity patterns on Grassmann manifold. Neuroimage 2011;56:2058–67

    CrossRefPubMed
75. 75.↵
    1. Brown MR,
    2. Sidhu GS,
    3. Greiner R,
    4. et al

    . ADHD-200 global competition: Diagnosing ADHD using personal characteristic data can outperform resting state fMRI measurements. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:69

    PubMed
76. 76.↵
    1. Bohland JW,
    2. Saperstein S,
    3. Pereira F,
    4. et al

    . Network, anatomical, and non-imaging measures for the prediction of ADHD diagnosis in individual subjects. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:78

    PubMed
77. 77.↵
    1. Cheng W,
    2. Ji X,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. et al

    . Individual classification of ADHD patients by integrating multiscale neuroimaging markers and advanced pattern recognition techniques. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:58

    PubMed
78. 78.↵
    1. Colby JB,
    2. Rudie JD,
    3. Brown JA,
    4. et al

    . Insights into multimodal imaging classification of ADHD. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:59

    PubMed
79. 79.↵
    1. Dai Z,
    2. Yan C,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. et al

    . Discriminative analysis of early Alzheimer's disease using multi-modal imaging and multi-level characterization with multi-classifier (M3). Neuroimage 2012;59:2187–95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
80. 80.↵
    1. Dai D,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Hua J,
    4. et al

    . Classification of ADHD children through multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:63

    PubMed
81. 81.↵
    1. Eloyan A,
    2. Muschelli J,
    3. Nebel MB,
    4. et al

    . Automated diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactive disorder using magnetic resonance imaging. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:61

    PubMed
82. 82.↵
    1. Koch W,
    2. Teipel S,
    3. Mueller S,
    4. et al

    . Diagnostic power of default mode network resting state fMRI in the detection of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2012;33:466–78

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
83. 83.↵
    1. Long D,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Xuan M,
    4. et al

    . Automatic classification of early Parkinson's disease with multi-modal MR imaging. PLoS One 2012;7:e47714

    CrossRefPubMed
84. 84.↵
    1. Ma Q,
    2. Zeng LL,
    3. Shen H,
    4. et al

    . Altered cerebellar-cerebral resting-state functional connectivity reliably identifies major depressive disorder. Brain Res 2013;1495:86–94

    CrossRefPubMed
85. 85.↵
    1. Meier TB,
    2. Desphande AS,
    3. Vergun S,
    4. et al

    . Support vector machine classification and characterization of age-related reorganization of functional brain networks. Neuroimage 2012;60:601–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
86. 86.↵
    1. Olivetti E,
    2. Greiner S,
    3. Avesani P

    . ADHD diagnosis from multiple data sources with batch effects. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:70

    PubMed
87. 87.↵
    1. Richiardi J,
    2. Gschwind M,
    3. Simioni S,
    4. et al

    . Classifying minimally disabled multiple sclerosis patients from resting state functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2012;62:2021–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
88. 88.↵
    1. Sato JR,
    2. Hoexter MQ,
    3. Fujita A,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of pattern recognition and feature extraction methods in ADHD prediction. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:68

    PubMed
89. 89.↵
    1. Sidhu GS,
    2. Asgarian N,
    3. Greiner R,
    4. et al

    . Kernel principal component analysis for dimensionality reduction in fMRI-based diagnosis of ADHD. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:74

    PubMed
90. 90.↵
    1. Tang Y,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Cao F,
    4. et al

    . Identify schizophrenia using resting-state functional connectivity: an exploratory research and analysis. Biomed Eng Online 2012;11:50

    CrossRefPubMed
91. 91.↵
    1. Venkataraman A,
    2. Whitford TJ,
    3. Westin CF,
    4. et al

    . Whole brain resting state functional connectivity abnormalities in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2012;139:7–12

    CrossRefPubMed
92. 92.↵
    1. Wee CY,
    2. Yap PT,
    3. Zhang D,
    4. et al

    . Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks. Neuroimage 2012;59:2045–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
93. 93.↵
    1. Zeng LL,
    2. Shen H,
    3. Liu L,
    4. et al

    . Identifying major depression using whole-brain functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis. Brain 2012;135:1498–507

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
94. 94.↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Jiang T,
    4. et al

    . Altered spontaneous activity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment revealed by regional homogeneity. Neuroimage 2012;59:1429–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
95. 95.↵
    1. Fair DA,
    2. Nigg JT,
    3. Iyer S,
    4. et al

    . Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data. Front Syst Neurosci 2012;6:80

    CrossRefPubMed
96. 96.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Shen H,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. et al

    . Functional connectivity-based signatures of schizophrenia revealed by multiclass pattern analysis of resting-state fMRI from schizophrenic patients and their healthy siblings. Biomed Eng Online 2013;12:10

    CrossRefPubMed
97. 97.↵
    1. Zhang D,
    2. Liu B,
    3. Chen J,
    4. et al

    . Determination of vascular dementia brain in distinct frequency bands with whole brain functional connectivity patterns. PLoS One 2013;8:e54512

    CrossRefPubMed
98. 98.↵
    1. van den Heuvel MP,
    2. Hulshoff Pol HE

    . Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2010;20:519–34

    CrossRefPubMed
99. 99.↵
    1. Lee MH,
    2. Smyser CD,
    3. Shimony JS

    . Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1866–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
100. 100.↵
     1. Fan J,
     2. Xu P,
     3. Van Dam NT,
     4. et al

     . Spontaneous brain activity relates to autonomic arousal. J Neurosci 2012;32:11176–86

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
101. 101.↵
     1. De Havas JA,
     2. Parimal S,
     3. Soon CS,
     4. et al

     . Sleep deprivation reduces default mode network connectivity and anti-correlation during rest and task performance. Neuroimage 2012;59:1745–51

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
102. 102.↵
     1. Van Dijk KR,
     2. Hedden T,
     3. Venkataraman A,
     4. et al

     . Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J Neurophysiol 2010;103:297–321

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
103. 103.↵
     1. Anderson JS,
     2. Ferguson MA,
     3. Lopez-Larson M,
     4. et al

     . Reproducibility of single-subject functional connectivity measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:548–55

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
104. 104.↵
     1. Margulies DS,
     2. Bottger J,
     3. Long X,
     4. et al

     . Resting developments: a review of fMRI post-processing methodologies for spontaneous brain activity. MAGMA 2010;23:289–307

     CrossRefPubMed
105. 105.↵
     1. Adler RH

     . Engel's biopsychosocial model is still relevant today. J Psychosom Res 2009;67:607–11

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
106. 106.↵
     1. Engel GL

     . The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129–36

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
107. 107.↵
     1. Smith RC,
     2. Fortin AH,
     3. Dwamena F,
     4. et al

     . An evidence-based patient-centered method makes the biopsychosocial model scientific. Patient Educ Couns 2013;91:265–70

     CrossRefPubMed
108. 108.↵
     1. Fuchs T

     . Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in psychiatric diagnosis. Psychopathology 2010;43:268–74

     CrossRefPubMed
109. 109.↵
     1. Büchi S,
     2. Sensky T,
     3. Sharpe L,
     4. et al

     . Graphic representation of illness: a novel method of measuring patients' perceptions of the impact of illness. Psychother Psychosom 1998;67:222–25

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
110. 110.↵
     1. Marquand AF,
     2. De Simoni S,
     3. O'Daly OG,
     4. et al

     . Pattern classification of working memory networks reveals differential effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and placebo in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011;36:1237–47

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
111. 111.↵
     1. Biswal BB,
     2. Mennes M,
     3. Zuo XN,
     4. et al

     . Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:4734–39

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
112. 112.↵
     1. Gong G,
     2. He Y,
     3. Evans AC

     . Brain connectivity: gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist 2011;17:575–91

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
113. 113.↵
     1. Friedman L,
     2. Glover GH,
     3. Krenz D,
     4. et al

     . Reducing inter-scanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: role of smoothness equalization. Neuroimage 2006;32:1656–68

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
114. 114.↵
     1. Ioannidis JP

     . Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005;2:e124

     CrossRefPubMed