Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Bioactive versus Bare Platinum Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: The MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial

C.G. McDougall, S. Claiborne Johnston, A. Gholkar, S.L. Barnwell, J.C. Vazquez Suarez, J. Massó Romero, J.C. Chaloupka, A. Bonafe, A.K. Wakhloo, D. Tampieri, C.F. Dowd, A.J. Fox, S.J. Imm, K. Carroll, A.S. Turk and for the MAPS Investigators
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2014, 35 (5) 935-942; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3857
C.G. McDougall
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (C.G.M.), Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Claiborne Johnston
bClinical and Translational Science Institute (S.C.J.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Gholkar
dDepartment of Neuroradiology (A.G.), Regional Neurosciences Center, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.L. Barnwell
eDepartments of Neurological Surgery and Diagnostic Radiology (S.L.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.C. Vazquez Suarez
fTherapeutic Neuroradiology Unit (J.C.V.S.), University General Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Massó Romero
gDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.M.R.), Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.C. Chaloupka
hDepartment of Neurosurgery and Radiology (J.C.C.), Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Bonafe
iService de Neuroradiologie (A.B.), Hôspital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.K. Wakhloo
jDivision of Neuroimaging and Intervention (A.K.W.), Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Tampieri
kDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (D.T.), Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.F. Dowd
cDepartment of Radiology (C.F.D.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.J. Fox
lDepartment of Neuroradiology (A.J.F.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.J. Imm
mStryker Corporation (S.J.I., K.C.), Fremont, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Carroll
mStryker Corporation (S.J.I., K.C.), Fremont, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.S. Turk
nDepartments of Neurointerventional Surgery, Radiology, and Neurosurgery (A.S.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Yu LM,
    4. et al
    . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Zabramski JM,
    4. et al
    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Birks J,
    4. et al
    . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kang HS,
    2. Han MH,
    3. Kwon BJ,
    4. et al
    . Short-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with polyglycolic acid/lactide copolymer-coated coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1921–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Taschner CA,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Rachdi H,
    4. et al
    . Matrix detachable coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: analysis of early angiographic and clinical outcomes. Stroke 2005;36:2176–80
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Gauvrit JY,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix coils: a preliminary study of immediate post-treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:373–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al
    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34: 1398–1403
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Heros RC,
    2. Zauner A
    . Early experience with Matrix detachable coils. J Neurosurg 2006;105:190–91, discussion 191
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Vinuela F,
    3. Ishii A,
    4. et al
    . Initial clinical experience with Matrix detachable coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2006;105:192–99
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque FC,
    3. McDougall CG
    . Durability of aneurysm embolization with Matrix detachable coils. Neurosurgery 2006;58:51–59
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Niimi Y,
    2. Song J,
    3. Madrid M,
    4. et al
    . Endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils: early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke 2006;37:1028–32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Katsaridis V,
    2. Papagiannaki C,
    3. Violaris C
    . Guglielmi detachable coils versus Matrix coils: a comparison of the immediate posttreatment results of the embolization of 364 cerebral aneurysms in 307 patients—a single-center, single-surgeon experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1841–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Bonafe A,
    3. Bracard S,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix detachable coils: immediate posttreatment results from a prospective multicenter registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1693–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rivet DJ,
    2. Moran CJ,
    3. Mazumdar A,
    4. et al
    . Single-institution experience with Matrix coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with same-center outcomes with the use of platinum coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1736–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Bonafe A,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils: short- and mid-term results in ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;63:850–57
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Bonafe A,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix detachable coils: midterm anatomic follow-up from a prospective multicenter registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:57–61
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ishii A,
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Nien YL,
    4. et al
    . Immediate and midterm outcomes of patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Matrix1 and Matrix2 coils: a comparative analysis based on a single-center experience in 250 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 2008;63:1071–77
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Smith MJ,
    2. Mascitelli J,
    3. Santillan A,
    4. et al
    . Bare platinum vs Matrix detachable coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a multivariate logistic regression analysis and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2011;69:557–64
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Ricolfi F,
    4. et al
    . Mid-term anatomic results after endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils and Matrix coils: analysis of the CLARITY series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:469–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Lewis SC,
    3. Gholkar A,
    4. et al
    . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Coley S,
    2. Sneade M,
    3. Clarke A,
    4. et al
    . Cerecyte Coil Trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474–80
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wiebers DO,
    2. Whisnant JP,
    3. Huston J III.,
    4. et al
    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Vitry F
    . Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497–504
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    The CARAT Investigators. Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke 2006;37:1437–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 5
1 May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bioactive versus Bare Platinum Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: The MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
C.G. McDougall, S. Claiborne Johnston, A. Gholkar, S.L. Barnwell, J.C. Vazquez Suarez, J. Massó Romero, J.C. Chaloupka, A. Bonafe, A.K. Wakhloo, D. Tampieri, C.F. Dowd, A.J. Fox, S.J. Imm, K. Carroll, A.S. Turk, for the MAPS Investigators
Bioactive versus Bare Platinum Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: The MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2014, 35 (5) 935-942; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3857

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Bioactive versus Bare Platinum Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: The MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) Trial
C.G. McDougall, S. Claiborne Johnston, A. Gholkar, S.L. Barnwell, J.C. Vazquez Suarez, J. Massó Romero, J.C. Chaloupka, A. Bonafe, A.K. Wakhloo, D. Tampieri, C.F. Dowd, A.J. Fox, S.J. Imm, K. Carroll, A.S. Turk, for the MAPS Investigators
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2014, 35 (5) 935-942; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3857
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • New Artisse intrasaccular device for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short term clinical and angiographic result from the prospective registry INSPIRE-A
  • Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the CorPath GRX robotic system in endovascular embolization procedures of cerebral aneurysms
  • Management of aneurysmal recurrence after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment
  • A novel self-expanding shape memory polymer coil for intracranial aneurysm embolization: 1 year follow-up in Chile
  • Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Time to recognize three classes of non-inferiority trial margins
  • Patient and aneurysm factors associated with aneurysm recanalization after coiling
  • Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Care Trial
  • Pivotal trial of the Neuroform Atlas stent for treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms: one-year outcomes
  • Five-year results of randomized bioactive versus bare metal coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the Matrix and Platinum Science (MAPS) Trial
  • Changing the Rules of the Game: The Problem of Surrogate Angiographic Outcomes in the Evaluation of Aneurysm Treatments
  • The Distribution and Role of M1 and M2 Macrophages in Aneurysm Healing after Platinum Coil Embolization
  • The LUNA aneurysm embolization system for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short-term, mid-term and long-term clinical and angiographic results
  • Indications for the Performance of Intracranial Endovascular Neurointerventional Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Factors Influencing Confidence in Diagnostic Ratings and Retreatment Recommendations in Coiled Aneurysms
  • Second-Generation Hydrogel Coils for the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • How safe and effective are existing treatments for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms? Literature-based objective performance criteria for safety and effectiveness
  • Surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a pragmatic randomised trial
  • Hydrogel versus Bare Platinum Coils in Patients with Large or Recurrent Aneurysms Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Geographic Differences in Endovascular Treatment and Retreatment of Cerebral Aneurysms
  • Fate of Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 6 Months: Rate of Progression to Further Recanalization and Related Risk Factors
  • Inter- and Intrarater Agreement on the Outcome of Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms Using MRA
  • From bench to bedside: utility of the rabbit elastase aneurysm model in preclinical studies of intracranial aneurysm treatment
  • Periprocedural safety of aneurysm embolization with the Medina Coil System: the early human experience
  • Technology developments in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms
  • Clinical and angiographic outcomes after stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with Enterprise and Neuroform stents: a comparative analysis of the literature
  • Mechanisms of Healing in Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: A Review of the Literature
  • Is Visual Evaluation of Aneurysm Coiling a Reliable Study End Point?: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • The Maze-Making and Solving Technique for Coil Embolization of Large and Giant Aneurysms
  • Counterpoint--Target Aneurysm Recurrence: Measuring What Matters
  • Point--TAR: A Useful Index to Follow-Up Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms?
  • Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: Periprocedural Results of the PRET Randomized Trial on Large and Recurrent Aneurysms
  • Counterpoint--Response to "In Memoriam: The Matrix Coil"
  • In Memoriam: The Matrix Coil
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Guided vs Conventional Angiography Systems
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire