Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleNeurointervention

Flow Diversion versus Traditional Endovascular Coiling Therapy: Design of the Prospective LARGE Aneurysm Randomized Trial

A.S. Turk, R.H. Martin, D. Fiorella, J. Mocco, A. Siddiqui and A. Bonafe
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2014, 35 (7) 1341-1345; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3968
A.S. Turk III
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.S.T., R.H.M.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.H. Martin
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.S.T., R.H.M.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Fiorella
bDepartment of Neurological Surgery (D.F.), Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Mocco
cDepartment of Neurological Surgery (J.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Siddiqui
dDepartment of Neurosurgery (A.S.), University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Bonafe
eDepartment of Neurosurgery (A.B.), Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Caranci F,
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Cirillo L,
    4. et al
    . Epidemiology and genetics of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1598–605
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Molyneux A,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Stratton I,
    4. et al
    . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Yu LM,
    4. et al
    . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Administration FaD
    FDA. Summary FE. P100018: Chestnut medical Pipeline embolization device. In: Administration FaD , ed. FDA, Washington, DC: Executive Summary; 2011:72
  5. 5.↵
    International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1725–33
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gonzalez N,
    2. Sedrak M,
    3. Martin N,
    4. et al
    . Impact of anatomic features in the endovascular embolization of 181 anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Stroke 2008;39:2776–82
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Byrne JV,
    2. Sohn MJ,
    3. Molyneux AJ,
    4. et al
    . Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999;90:656–63
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hayakawa M,
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Duckwiler GR,
    4. et al
    . Natural history of the neck remnant of a cerebral aneurysm treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil system. J Neurosurg 2000;93:561–68
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Clarencon F,
    2. Bonneville F,
    3. Boch AL,
    4. et al
    . Parent artery occlusion is not obsolete in giant aneurysms of the ICA. Experience with very-long-term follow-up. Neuroradiology 2011;53:973–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Higashida RT,
    2. Halbach VV,
    3. Dowd C,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular detachable balloon embolization therapy of cavernous carotid artery aneurysms: results in 87 cases. J Neurosurg 1990;72:857–63
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Linskey ME,
    2. Sekhar LN,
    3. Hirsch W Jr.,
    4. et al
    . Aneurysms of the intracavernous carotid artery: clinical presentation, radiographic features, and pathogenesis. Neurosurgery 1990;26:71–79
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Larson JJ,
    2. Tew JM Jr.,
    3. Tomsick TA,
    4. et al
    . Treatment of aneurysms of the internal carotid artery by intravascular balloon occlusion: long-term follow-up of 58 patients. Neurosurgery 1995;36:26–30
    PubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wong GK,
    2. Poon WS,
    3. Chun H,
    4. et al
    . Balloon test occlusion with hypotensive challenge for main trunk occlusion of internal carotid artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Br J Neurosurg 2010;24:648–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gallas S,
    2. Pasco A,
    3. Cottier JP,
    4. et al
    . A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1723–31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Nien YL,
    3. Duckwiler G,
    4. et al
    . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98:959–66
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Vinuela F,
    2. Duckwiler G,
    3. Mawad M
    . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997;86:475–82
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fernandez Zubillaga A,
    2. Guglielmi G,
    3. Vinuela F,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al
    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ortiz R,
    2. Song J,
    3. Niimi Y,
    4. et al
    . Rate of recanalization and safety of endovascular embolization of intracranial saccular aneurysms framed with GDC 360 coils. Interv Neuroradiol 2008;14:397–401
    PubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Hsu D,
    3. Woo HH,
    4. et al
    . Very late thrombosis of a Pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 2010;onsE313–314; discussion onsE314
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I,
    4. et al
    . Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:56–65
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Becske T,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Saatci I,
    4. et al
    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kawanabe Y,
    2. Sadato A,
    3. Taki W,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between coil packing density and coil compaction. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001;143:451–55
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Reul J,
    2. Spetzger U,
    3. Weis J,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular occlusion of experimental aneurysms with detachable coils: influence of packing density and perioperative anticoagulation. Neurosurgery 1997;41:1160–65; discussion 1165–68
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Tamatani S,
    2. Ito Y,
    3. Abe H,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:762–67
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. O'Brien PC,
    2. Fleming TR
    . A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549–56
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Pampallona STA,
    2. Kim KM
    . Interim monitoring of group sequential trials using spending functions for the Type I and Type II error probabilities. Drug Inf J 2001;35:1113–21
    CrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Pocock SJ
    . Statistical and ethical issues in monitoring clinical trials. Stat Med 1993;12:1459–69; discussion 1471–55
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 7
1 Jul 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Flow Diversion versus Traditional Endovascular Coiling Therapy: Design of the Prospective LARGE Aneurysm Randomized Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.S. Turk, R.H. Martin, D. Fiorella, J. Mocco, A. Siddiqui, A. Bonafe
Flow Diversion versus Traditional Endovascular Coiling Therapy: Design of the Prospective LARGE Aneurysm Randomized Trial
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2014, 35 (7) 1341-1345; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3968

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Flow Diversion versus Traditional Endovascular Coiling Therapy: Design of the Prospective LARGE Aneurysm Randomized Trial
A.S. Turk, R.H. Martin, D. Fiorella, J. Mocco, A. Siddiqui, A. Bonafe
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2014, 35 (7) 1341-1345; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3968
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Methods and Design
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Feasibility study for use of angiographic parametric imaging and deep neural networks for intracranial aneurysm occlusion prediction
  • Contemporary endovascular and open aneurysm treatment in the era of flow diversion
  • Hydrogel versus Bare Platinum Coils in Patients with Large or Recurrent Aneurysms Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic artery aneurysms: ophthalmic artery patency following flow diversion versus coil embolization
  • Technology developments in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms
  • Flow Diversion versus Standard Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Unruptured Carotid-Ophthalmic Aneurysms
  • Randomized controlled trials for everything?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire