Toward Improving Fidelity of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations: Boundary Conditions Matter

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Jansen IG,
   2. Schneiders JJ,
   3. Potters WV,
   4. et al

   . Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1543–48

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Karmonik C,
   2. Yen C,
   3. Diaz O,
   4. et al

   . Temporal variations of wall shear stress parameters in intracranial aneurysms–importance of patient-specific inflow waveforms for CFD calculations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1391–98; discussion 1398

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Karmonik C,
   2. Yen C,
   3. Grossman RG,
   4. et al

   . Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:479–85; discussion 485

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Venugopal P,
   2. Valentino D,
   3. Schmitt H,
   4. et al

   . Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebal aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1051–60

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Marzo A,
   2. Singh P,
   3. Larrabide I,
   4. et al

   . Computational hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms: the effects of modeled versus measured boundary conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:884–96

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Burleson AC,
   2. Strother CM,
   3. Turitto VT

   . Computer modeling of intracranial saccular and lateral aneurysms for the study of their hemodynamics. Neurosurgery 1995;37:774–82; discussion 782–84

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Byrne G,
   2. Mut F,
   3. Cebral J

   . Quantifying the large-scale hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:333–38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Mut F,
   3. Weir J,
   4. et al

   . Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:264–70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Jou LD,
   2. Lee DH,
   3. Morsi H,
   4. et al

   . Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1761–67

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Jiang J,
    2. Strother C

    . Computational fluid dynamics simulations of intracranial aneurysms at varying heart rates: a “patient-specific” study. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:091001
11. 11.↵
    1. Ford MD,
    2. Stuhne GR,
    3. Nikolov HN,
    4. et al

    . Virtual angiography for visualization and validation of computational models of aneurysm hemodynamics. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2005;24:1586–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Endres J,
    2. Kowarschik M,
    3. Redel T,
    4. et al

    . A workflow for patient-individualized virtual angiogram generation based on CFD simulation. Comput Math Methods Med 2012;2012:306765

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Sun Q,
    2. Groth A,
    3. Bertram M,
    4. et al

    . Phantom-based experimental validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations on cerebral aneurysms. Med Phys 2010;37:5054–65

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Sun Q,
    2. Groth A,
    3. Aach T

    . Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Med Phys 2012;39:742–54

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Klucznik R,
    3. Benndorf G

    . Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics–preliminary experience. Rofo 2008;180:209–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Klucznik R,
    3. Benndorf G

    . Comparison of velocity patterns in an AComA aneurysm measured with 2D phase contrast MRI and simulated with CFD. Technol Health Care 2008;16:119–28

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Boussel L,
    2. Rayz V,
    3. Martin A,
    4. et al

    . Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:409–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Rayz VL,
    2. Boussel L,
    3. Acevedo-Bolton G,
    4. et al

    . Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements. J Biomed Eng 2008;130:051011
19. 19.↵
    1. Berg P,
    2. Stucht D,
    3. Janiga G,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral blood flow in a healthy circle of Willis and two intracranial aneurysms: computational fluid dynamics versus 4D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomed Eng 2014;136:041003
20. 20.↵
    1. Jiang J,
    2. Johnson K,
    3. Valen-Sendstad K,
    4. et al

    . Flow characteristics in a canine aneurysm model: a comparison of 4D accelerated phase-contrast MR measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations. Med Phys 2011;38:6300–12

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Meng H

    . Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics–closing the gap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:396–98

    FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Kallmes DF

    . Point: CFD–computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:395–96

    FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Strother CM,
    2. Jiang J

    . Intracranial aneurysms, cancer, x-rays, and computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:991–92

    FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Hentschel S,
    2. Mardal KA,
    3. Lovgren AE,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of cyclic CSF flow in the foramen magnum and upper cervical spinal canal with MR flow imaging and computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:997–1002

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Linge SO,
    2. Mardal KA,
    3. Haughton V,
    4. et al

    . Simulating CSF flow dynamics in the normal and the Chiari I subarachnoid space during rest and exertion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:41–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Chintalapani G,
    3. Redel T,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamics at the ostium of cerebral aneurysms with relation to post-treatment changes by a virtual flow diverter: a computational fluid dynamics study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013;2013:1895–98

    PubMed