Intracranial Aneurysmal Pulsatility as a New Individual Criterion for Rupture Risk Evaluation: Biomechanical and Numeric Approach (IRRAs Project)

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Wardlaw J,
   2. White P

   . The detection and management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Brain 2000;123:205–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Horikoshi T,
   2. Sugita M,
   3. Yagishita T,
   4. et al

   . Size of cerebral aneurysms and related factors in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol 2002;61:239–45
3. 3.↵
   1. Nahed B,
   2. Diluna M,
   3. Morgan T,
   4. et al

   . Hypertension, age, and location predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2005;57:676–83

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Matsubara S,
   2. Hadeishir H,
   3. Suzukil A,
   4. et al

   . Incidence and risk factors for the growth of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: observation using serial computerized tomography angiography. J Neurosurg 2004;101:908–14

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Chung S,
   2. Vafai K

   . A coupling model for macromolecule transport in a stenosed arterial wall. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2012;45:371–81
6. 6.↵
   1. Nicoud F,
   2. Moreno R,
   3. Tayllamin B,
   4. et al

   . Computational hemodynamics in moving geometries without solving the fluid-structure interaction problem. Paper presented at: Conference on Modelling Fluid Flow 2009. The 14th International Conference on Fluid Flow Technologies. Budapest, Hungary. September 9–12, 2009
7. 7.↵
   1. Balocco S,
   2. Camara O,
   3. Vivas E,
   4. et al

   . Feasibility of estimating regional mechanical properties of cerebral aneurysms in vivo. Med Phys 2010;37:1689–706

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Rissland P,
   2. Alemu Y,
   3. Einav S,
   4. et al

   . Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:031001
9. 9.↵
   1. Torii R,
   2. Oshima M,
   3. Kobayashi T,
   4. et al

   . Fluid structure interaction modeling of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling. Comput Mech 2008;43:151–59

   CrossRefWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Vito R,
    2. Hickey J

    . The mechanical-properties of soft-tissues. 2. The elastic response of arterial segments. J Biomech 1980;13:951–57

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Vande Geest J,
    2. Schmidt E,
    3. Sacks M,
    4. et al

    . The effects of anisotropy on the stress analyses of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:921–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Vande Geest J,
    2. Sacks M,
    3. Vorp D

    . The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J Biomech 2006;39:1324–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Costalat V,
    2. Sanchez M,
    3. Ambard D,
    4. et al

    . Biomechanical wall properties of human intracranial aneurysms resected following surgical clipping. J Biomech 2011;44:2685–91

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Sanchez M,
    2. Ambard D,
    3. Costalat V,
    4. et al

    . Biomechanical assessment of the individual risk of rupture of cerebral aneurysms: a proof of concept. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:28–40

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Duprey A,
    2. Khanafer K,
    3. Sclicht M

    . In vitro characterisation of physiological and maximum elastic modulus of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms using uniaxial tensile testing. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010;39:700–07

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Ambard D,
    2. Cherblanc F

    . Mechanical behavior of annulus fibrosus: a microstructural model of fibers reorientation. Ann Biomed Eng 2009;37:2256–65

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Jourdan F,
    2. Samida A

    . An implicit numerical method for wear modeling applied to hip joint prothesis problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2009;198:2209–17
18. 18.↵
    1. Malachanne E,
    2. Dureisseix D,
    3. Jourdan F

    . Numerical model of bone remodeling sensitive to loading frequency through a poroelastic behavior and internal fluid movements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:849–57

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Swider P,
    2. Pedrono A,
    3. Ambard D,
    4. et al

    . Substructuring and poroelastic modelling of the intervertebral disc. J Biomech 2010;47:1287–91
20. 20.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Meng H,
    3. Woodward S,
    4. et al

    . Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Van de Vosse FN

    . Pulse wave propagation in the arterial tree. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 2011;43:467–99

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. Steiner L,
    2. Andrews J

    . Monitoring the injured brain: ICP and CBF. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:26–38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Ai L,
    2. Vafai K

    . A coupling model for macromolecule transport in a stenosed arterial wall. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2006;49:1568–91
24. 24.↵
    1. Watton P,
    2. Raberger N,
    3. Holzapfel G,
    4. et al

    . Blood flow dynamics and fluid-structure interaction in patient specific bifurcating cerebral aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:1–14
25. 25.↵
    1. Yang N,
    2. Vafai K

    . Modeling of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) transport in the artery-effects of hypertension. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2006;49:850–67

    CrossRefWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Valencia A,
    2. Ledermann D,
    3. Rivera R,
    4. et al

    . Blood flow dynamics and fluid-structure interaction in patient specific bifurcating cerebral aneurysm. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2009;58:1081–1100
27. 27.↵
    1. Alnaes M,
    2. Isaksen J,
    3. Mardal K,
    4. et al

    . Computation of hemodynamics in the circle of Willis. Stroke 2007;38:2500–05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Hayakawa M,
    2. Maeda S,
    3. Sadato A,
    4. et al

    . Detection of pulsation in ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms by electrocardiographically gated 3-dimensional computed tomographic angiography with a 320- row area detector computed tomography and evaluation of its clinical usefulness. Neurosurgery 2011;69:843–51

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Ishida F,
    2. Ogawa H,
    3. Simizu T,
    4. et al

    . Visualizing the dynamics of cerebral aneurysms with four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. Neurosurgery 2005;57:460–71

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Villa-Uriol M,
    3. Craene M,
    4. et al

    . Morphodynamic analysis of cerebral aneurysm pulsation from time-resolved rotational angiography. Med Imag 2009;28:1105–16
31. 31.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Diaz O,
    3. Grossman R,
    4. et al

    . In vivo quantification of wall motion in cerebral aneurysm from 2D cine phase contrast magnetic resonance images. Rofo 2010;182:140–51

    PubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. San Millan Ruiz D,
    2. Yilmaz H,
    3. Dehdashti A,
    4. et al

    . The perianeurysmal environment: influence on saccular aneurysm shape and rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:504–12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Seshaiyer P,
    2. Humphrey J

    . On the potentially protective role of contact constraints on saccular aneurysms. J Biomech 2001;34:607–12

    PubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. MacDonald D,
    2. Finlay H,
    3. Canham P

    . Directional wall strength in saccular brain aneurysms from polarized light microscopy. Ann Biomed Eng 2000;28:533–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Cebral J,
    2. Castro M,
    3. Putman C,
    4. et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2005;24:457–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Sforza D,
    2. Putman C,
    3. Cebral J

    . Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 2008;41:91–107