Accuracy of Parenchymal Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements Using Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin-Labeling in Healthy Volunteers

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Williams DS,
   3. Detre JA,
   4. Leigh JS, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:212–16 doi:10.1073/pnas.89.1.212 pmid:1729691

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Alsop DC,
   3. Detre JA,
   4. Golay X, et al

   . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2014 Apr 8. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Dai W,
   3. Garcia D,
   4. de Bazelaire C, et al

   . Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1488–97 doi:10.1002/mrm.21790 pmid:19025913

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Heijtel DF,
   3. Mutsaerts HJ,
   4. Bakker E, et al

   . Accuracy and precision of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion during baseline and hypercapnia: a head-to-head comparison with ¹⁵O H₂O positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 2014;92:182–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.011 pmid:24531046

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Parkes LM,
   3. Rashid W,
   4. Chard DT, et al

   . Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:736–43 doi:10.1002/mrm.20023 pmid:15065246

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Asllani I,
   3. Habeck C,
   4. Borogovac A, et al

   . Separating function from structure in perfusion imaging of the aging brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:2927–35 doi:10.1002/hbm.20719 pmid:19172645

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Biagi L,
   3. Abbruzzese A,
   4. Bianchi MC, et al

   . Age dependence of cerebral perfusion assessed by magnetic resonance continuous arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:696–702 doi:10.1002/jmri.20839 pmid:17279531

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Chen JJ,
   3. Rosas HD,
   4. Salat DH

   . Age-associated reductions in cerebral blood flow are independent from regional atrophy. Neuroimage 2011;55:468–78 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.032 pmid:21167947

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Leenders KL,
   3. Perani D,
   4. Lammertsma AA, et al

   . Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization. Normal values and effect of age. Brain 1990;113:27–47 doi:10.1093/brain/113.1.27 pmid:2302536

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Slosman DO,
    3. Chicherio C,
    4. Ludwig C, et al

    . (133)Xe SPECT cerebral blood flow study in a healthy population: determination of T-scores. J Nucl Med 2001;42:864–70 pmid:11390549

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Meltzer CC,
    3. Cantwell MN,
    4. Greer PJ, et al

    . Does cerebral blood flow decline in healthy aging? A PET study with partial-volume correction. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1842–48 pmid:11079492

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Aanerud J,
    3. Borghammer P,
    4. Chakravarty MM, et al

    . Brain energy metabolism and blood flow differences in healthy aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012;32:1177–87 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.18 pmid:22373642

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Aslan S,
    3. Xu F,
    4. Wang PL, et al

    . Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:765–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.22245 pmid:20187183

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Wåhlin A,
    3. Ambarki K,
    4. Hauksson J, et al

    . Phase contrast MRI quantification of pulsatile volumes of brain arteries, veins, and cerebrospinal fluids compartments: repeatability and physiological interactions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:1055–62 doi:10.1002/jmri.23527 pmid:22170792

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Valverde S,
    3. Oliver A,
    4. Cabezas M, et al

    . Comparison of 10 brain tissue segmentation methods using revisited IBSR annotations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:93–101 doi:10.1002/jmri.24517 pmid:24459099

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Folstein MF,
    3. Folstein SE,
    4. McHugh PR

    . “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98 doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 pmid:1202204

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Pienaar R,
    3. Paldino MJ,
    4. Madan N, et al

    . A quantitative method for correlating observations of decreased apparent diffusion coefficient with elevated cerebral blood perfusion in newborns presenting cerebral ischemic insults. Neuroimage 2012;63:1510–18 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.062 pmid:22892333

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Järnum H,
    3. Steffensen EG,
    4. Knutsson L, et al

    . Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010;52:307–17 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0616-6 pmid:19841916

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Mutsaerts HJ,
    3. Steketee RM,
    4. Heijtel DF, et al

    . Inter-vendor reproducibility of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at 3 Tesla. PLoS One 2014;9:e104108 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104108 pmid:25090654

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Melzer TR,
    3. Watts R,
    4. MacAskill MR, et al

    . Arterial spin labelling reveals an abnormal cerebral perfusion pattern in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2011;134:845–55 doi:10.1093/brain/awq377 pmid:21310726

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Rajapakse JC,
    3. Giedd JN,
    4. Rapoport JL

    . Statistical approach to segmentation of single-channel cerebral MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:176–86 doi:10.1109/42.563663 pmid:9101327

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Buxton RB,
    3. Frank LR,
    4. Wong EC, et al

    . A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:383–96 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400308 pmid:9727941

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Torack RM,
    3. Alcala H,
    4. Gado M, et al

    . Correlative assay of computerized cranial tomography CCT, water content and specific gravity in normal and pathological postmortem brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1976;35:385–92 doi:10.1097/00005072-197607000-00001 pmid:932786

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Bland JM,
    3. Altman DG

    . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10 pmid:2868172

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Bron EE,
    3. Steketee RM,
    4. Houston GC, et al

    ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Diagnostic classification of arterial spin labeling and structural MRI in presenile early stage dementia. Hum Brain Mapp 2014;35:4916–31 doi:10.1002/hbm.22522 pmid:24700485

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Jain V,
    3. Duda J,
    4. Avants B, et al

    . Longitudinal reproducibility and accuracy of pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MR imaging in typically developing children. Radiology 2012;263:527–36 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111509 pmid:22517961

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. van Golen LW,
    3. Kuijer JP,
    4. Huisman MC, et al

    . Quantification of cerebral blood flow in healthy volunteers and type 1 diabetic patients: comparison of MRI arterial spin labeling and [(15)O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET). J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:1300–09 doi:10.1002/jmri.24484 pmid:24214919

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Zhang K,
    3. Herzog H,
    4. Mauler J, et al

    . Comparison of cerebral blood flow acquired by simultaneous [15O]water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014;34:1373–80 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.92 pmid:24849665

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Henriksen OM,
    3. Larsson HB,
    4. Hansen AE, et al

    . Estimation of intersubject variability of cerebral blood flow measurements using MRI and positron emission tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:1290–99 doi:10.1002/jmri.23579 pmid:22246715

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Kety SS

    . Human cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption as related to aging. J Chronic Dis 1956;3:478–86 doi:10.1016/0021-9681(56)90146-1 pmid:13306754

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Good CD,
    3. Johnsrude IS,
    4. Ashburner J, et al

    . A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:21–36 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 pmid:11525331

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Scheel P,
    3. Ruge C,
    4. Schöning M

    . Flow velocity and flow volume measurements in the extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries in healthy adults: reference data and the effects of age. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26:1261–66 doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00293-3 pmid:11120363

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Cho S,
    3. Jones D,
    4. Reddick WE, et al

    . Establishing norms for age-related changes in proton T1 of human brain tissue in vivo. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:1133–43 doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(97)00202-6 pmid:9408134

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Breger RK,
    3. Yetkin FZ,
    4. Fischer ME, et al

    . T1 and T2 in the cerebrum: correlation with age, gender, and demographic factors. Radiology 1991;181:545–47 doi:10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924802 pmid:1924802

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Herscovitch P,
    3. Raichle ME

    . What is the correct value for the brain–blood partition coefficient for water? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5:65–69 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1985.9 pmid:3871783

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Esposito G,
    3. Van Horn JD,
    4. Weinberger DR, et al

    . Gender differences in cerebral blood flow as a function of cognitive state with PET. J Nucl Med 1996;37:559–64 pmid:8691239

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Varela M,
    3. Hajnal JV,
    4. Petersen ET, et al

    . A method for rapid in vivo measurement of blood T1. NMR Biomed 2011;24:80–88 doi:10.1002/nbm.1559 pmid:20669148

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Wu WC,
    3. Jain V,
    4. Li C, et al

    . In vivo venous blood T1 measurement using inversion recovery true-FISP in children and adults. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:1140–47 doi:10.1002/mrm.22484 pmid:20564586

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Qin Q,
    3. Strouse JJ,
    4. van Zijl PC

    . Fast measurement of blood T1 in the human jugular vein at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1297–304 doi:10.1002/mrm.22723 pmid:21500258

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Piechnik SK,
    3. Ferreira VM,
    4. Lewandowski AJ, et al

    . Normal variation of magnetic resonance T1 relaxation times in the human population at 1.5 T using ShMOLLI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:13 doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-13 pmid:23331520

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Bullitt E,
    3. Zeng D,
    4. Mortamet B, et al

    . The effects of healthy aging on intracerebral blood vessels visualized by magnetic resonance angiography. Neurobiol Aging 2010;31:290–300 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.022 pmid:18471935

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Zhao M,
    3. Charbel FT,
    4. Alperin N, et al

    . Improved phase-contrast flow quantification by three-dimensional vessel localization. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:697–706 doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(00)00157-0 pmid:10930779

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    2. Sheehy NP,
    3. Boyle GE,
    4. Meaney JF

    . Normal anterior spinal arteries within the cervical region: high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 2005;236:637–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.2362040804 pmid:15972334

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    2. Ambarki K,
    3. Hallberg P,
    4. Jóhannesson G, et al

    . Blood flow of ophthalmic artery in healthy individuals determined by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:2738–45 doi:10.1167/iovs.13-11737 pmid:23518769

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    2. van Osch MJ,
    3. Teeuwisse WM,
    4. van Walderveen MA, et al

    . Can arterial spin labeling detect white matter perfusion signal? Magn Reson Med 2009;62:165–73 doi:10.1002/mrm.22002 pmid:19365865

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Pohmann R

    . Accurate, localized quantification of white matter perfusion with single-voxel ASL. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:1109–13 doi:10.1002/mrm.22476 pmid:20535809

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Lu K,
    3. Liu T,
    4. Wong EC, et al

    . Regional white matter perfusion measurement using an optimized pseudo-continuous ASL MRI. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine [abstract 4401]. Honolulu, Hawaii. April 18–24, 2009
48. 48.↵
    2. Garcia DM,
    3. Duhamel G,
    4. Alsop DC

    . Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:366–72 doi:10.1002/mrm.20556 pmid:16032674

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science