Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of DSC- and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Preoperative Grading of Astrocytomas

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Law M,
   3. Yang S,
   4. Wang H, et al

   . Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1989–98

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Ellika SK,
   3. Jain R,
   4. Patel SC, et al

   . Role of perfusion CT in glioma grading and comparison with conventional MR imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1981–87

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Fan GG,
   3. Deng QL,
   4. Wu ZH, et al

   . Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in patients with non-enhancing supratentorial brain gliomas: a valuable tool to predict tumour grading? Br J Radiol 2006;79:652–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Liu X,
   3. Tian W,
   4. Kolar B, et al

   . MR diffusion tensor and perfusion-weighted imaging in preoperative grading of supratentorial nonenhancing gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:447–55

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Boxerman JL,
   3. Schmainda KM,
   4. Weisskoff RM

   . Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:859–67

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Boxerman JL,
   3. Prah DE,
   4. Paulson ES, et al

   . The role of preload and leakage correction in gadolinium-based cerebral blood volume estimation determined by comparison with MION as a criterion standard. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1081–87

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Sourbron S,
   3. Ingrisch M,
   4. Siefert A, et al

   . Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:205–17

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Patankar TF,
   3. Haroon HA,
   4. Mills SJ, et al

   . Is volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans) related to histologic grade in human gliomas? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2455–65

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. de Rochefort L,
   3. Nguyen T,
   4. Brown R, et al

   . In vivo quantification of contrast agent concentration using the induced magnetic field for time-resolved arterial input function measurement with MRI. Med Phys 2008;35:5328–39

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Foottit C,
    3. Cron GO,
    4. Hogan MJ, et al

    . Determination of the venous output function from MR signal phase: feasibility for quantitative DCE-MRI in human brain. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:772–81

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Bleeker EJ,
    3. van Buchem MA,
    4. Webb AG, et al

    . Phase-based arterial input function measurements for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:358–68

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Garpebring A,
    3. Wirestam R,
    4. Yu J, et al

    . Phase-based arterial input functions in humans applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: potential usefulness and limitations. MAGMA 2011;24:233–45

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Nguyen TB,
    3. Cron GO,
    4. Mercier JF, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging using a phase-derived vascular input function in the preoperative grading of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1539–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Cron GO,
    3. Kelcz F,
    4. Santyr GE

    . Improvement in breast lesion characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using pharmacokinetic modeling and bookend T(1) measurements. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:1066–70

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Haroon HA,
    3. Patankar TF,
    4. Zhu XP, et al

    . Comparison of cerebral blood volume maps generated from T2* and T1 weighted MRI data in intra-axial cerebral tumours. Br J Radiol 2007;80:161–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Lüdemann L,
    3. Warmuth C,
    4. Plotkin M, et al

    . Brain tumor perfusion: comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using T1, T2 and T2* contrast, pulsed arterial spin labeling, and H₂(15)O positron emission tomography. Eur J Radiol 2009;70:465–74

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Asari S,
    3. Makabe T,
    4. Katayama S, et al

    . Assessment of the pathological grade of astrocytic gliomas using an MRI score. Neuroradiology 1994;36:308–10

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Jung SC,
    3. Yeom JA,
    4. Kim JH, et al

    . Glioma: application of histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to tumor grading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1103–10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Emblem KE,
    3. Nedregaard B,
    4. Nome T, et al

    . Glioma grading by using histogram analysis of blood volume heterogeneity from MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps. Radiology 2008;247:808–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Saito T,
    3. Yamasaki F,
    4. Kajiwara Y, et al

    . Role of perfusion-weighted imaging at 3T in the histopathological differentiation between astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1863–69

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Cha S,
    3. Tihan T,
    4. Crawford F, et al

    . Differentiation of low-grade oligodendrogliomas from low-grade astrocytomas by using quantitative blood-volume measurements derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:266–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Mauz N,
    3. Krainik A,
    4. Tropres I, et al

    . Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of semiologic characteristics in first-pass perfusion of brain tumors at 1.5 and 3 Tesla. J Neuroradiol 2012;39:308–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Giesel FL,
    3. Mehndiratta A,
    4. Risse F, et al

    . Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobutrol for magnetic resonance perfusion in normal brain and intracranial tumors at 3 Tesla. Acta Radiol 2009;50:521–30

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Zanette B,
    3. Cron GO,
    4. Nguyen TB, et al

    . Accuracy of quantitative 3D DCE-MRI using variable flip angle T1 mapping, B1 correction, and the bookend method. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. April 20–26, 2013.