Initial Experience with p64: A Novel Mechanically Detachable Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Saccular Sidewall Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Fischer S,
   3. Vajda Z,
   4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

   . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Briganti F,
   3. Napoli M,
   4. Tortora , et al

   . Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications: a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1145–52

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Berge J,
   3. Biondi A,
   4. Machi P, et al

   . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. De Vries J,
   3. Boogaarts J,
   4. Van Norden A, et al

   . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Mallik AS,
   3. Nuss K,
   4. Kronen PW, et al

   . A new-generation, low-permeability flow diverting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Eur Radiol 2014;24:12–18

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Anzai H,
   3. Falcone JL,
   4. Chopard B, et al

   . Optimization of strut placement in flow diverter stents for four different aneurysm configurations. J Biomech Eng 2014;136:061006
8. 8.↵
   2. O I,
   3. M O,
   4. A AS, et al

   . Evaluation of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in patients with acute coronary syndrome using Adenosine Diphosphate Test and Aspirin Test. Pak J Med Sci 2013;29:97–102

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Del Castillo-Carnevali H,
   3. Barrios Alonso V,
   4. Zamorano Gomez JL

   . Antiplatelet therapy: resistance to traditional antiaggregation drugs and role of new antiplatelet agents [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc) 2014;143:222–29

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Campi A,
    3. Ramzi N,
    4. Molyneux AJ, et al

    . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Miranda C,
    4. Ceratto R, et al

    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. D'Urso PI,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review. Stroke 2011;42:2363–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Yang PF,
    4. Fang YB, et al

    . A novel flow-diverting device (Tubridge) for the treatment of 28 large or giant intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2326–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Augsburger L,
    3. Fahrhat M,
    4. Reymond P, et al

    . Effect of flow diverter porosity an intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol 2009;19:204–14

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Seshadhri S,
    3. Janiga G,
    4. Beuing O, et al

    . Impact of stents and flow diverters on hemodynamics in idealized aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng 2011;133:071005
16. 16.↵
    2. Wagner A,
    3. Cortsen M,
    4. Hauerberg J, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms: reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:709–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Ernemann U,
    4. Wetzel SG, et al

    . High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010;41:1690–96

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Berentei Z,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris SI,
    4. Gonzalez LF, et al

    . Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the Pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2326–30

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Turowski B,
    3. Macht S,
    4. Kulcsàr Z, et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Kulcsàr Z,
    3. Szikora I

    . The ESMINT Retrospective Analysis of Delayed Aneurysm Ruptures after Flow Diversion (RADAR) study. The eJournal of the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy 2012;1244000088. http://www.ejmint.org/sites/default/files/pdf/original_article_1244000088.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2012.
22. 22.↵
    2. Hu YC,
    3. Deshmukh VR,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . Histopathological assessment of fatal ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhages after the treatment of supraclinoid aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurosurg 2014;120:365–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science