MRI Texture Analysis Reveals Bulbar Abnormalities in Friedreich Ataxia

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Hajek M,
   3. Dezortova M,
   4. Materka A, et al

   . Texture Analysis for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Prague: Med4Publishing; 2006
2. 2.↵
   2. Bonilha L,
   3. Kobayashi E,
   4. Castellano G, et al

   . Texture analysis of hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia 2003;44:1546–50 doi:10.1111/epi.2003.44.issue-12 pmid:14636326

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Coelho GR,
   3. Kobayashi E,
   4. Bonilha L, et al

   . Hippocampal texture analysis in patients with familial mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003;61(suppl 1):83–87 doi:10.1590/S0004-282X2003000100015 pmid:15104396

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. de Oliveira MS,
   3. Betting LE,
   4. Mory SB, et al

   . Texture analysis of magnetic resonance images of patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2013;27:22–28 doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.12.009 pmid:23357730

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. de Oliveira MS,
   3. D'Abreu A,
   4. França MC Jr., et al

   . MRI-texture analysis of corpus callosum, thalamus, putamen, and caudate in Machado-Joseph disease. J Neuroimaging 2012;22:46–52 doi:10.1111/jon.2012.22.issue-1 pmid:21122004

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Mahmound-Ghoneim D,
   3. Toussaint G,
   4. Constans JM, et al

   . Three dimensional texture analysis in MRI: a preliminary evaluation in gliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:983–87 doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00201-7 pmid:14684200

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Herlidou-Même S,
   3. Constans JM,
   4. Carsin B, et al

   . MRI texture analysis on texture test objects, normal brain and intracranial tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:989–93 doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00212-1 pmid:14684201

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Sasikala M,
   3. Kumaravel

   . A wavelet-based optimal texture feature set for classification of brain tumours. J Med Eng Technol 2008; 32:198–205 doi:10.1080/03091900701455524 pmid:18432467

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Haralick R,
   3. Shanmungam K,
   4. Dinstein I

   . Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973;3:610–12 doi:10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    2. Haralick R

    . Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 1979;67:786–804 doi:10.1109/PROC.1979.11328

    CrossRefWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Pandolfo M

    . Friedreich ataxia. Arch Neurol 2008;65:1296–303 doi:10.1001/archneur.65.10.1296 pmid:18852343

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Fogel BL,
    3. Perlman S

    . Clinical features and molecular genetics of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:245–57 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70054-6 pmid:17303531

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Campuzano V,
    3. Montermini L,
    4. Moltò MD, et al

    . Friedreich's ataxia: autosomal recessive disease caused by an intronic GAA triplet repeat expansion. Science 1996;271:1423–27 doi:10.1126/science.271.5254.1423 pmid:8596916

    Abstract
14. 14.↵
    2. Koeppen AH,
    3. Mazurkiewicz JE

    . Friedreich ataxia: neuropathology revised. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2013;72:78–90 doi:10.1097/NEN.0b013e31827e5762 pmid:23334592

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Della Nave R,
    3. Ginestroni A,
    4. Giannelli M, et al

    . Brain structural damage in Friedreich's ataxia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:82–85 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.124297 pmid:17634216

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Della Nave R,
    3. Ginestroni A,
    4. Diciotti S, et al

    . Axial diffusivity is increased in the degenerating superior cerebellar peduncles of Friedreich's ataxia. Neuroradiology 2011;53:367–72 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0807-1 pmid:21128070

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. França MC Jr.,
    3. D'Abreu A,
    4. Yassuda CL, et al

    . A combined voxel-based morphometry and 1H-MRS study in patients with Friedreich's ataxia. J Neurol 2009;256:1114–20 doi:10.1007/s00415-009-5079-5 pmid:19280106

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Silva CB,
    3. Yasuda CL,
    4. D'Abreu A, et al

    . Neuroanatomical correlates of depression in Friedreich's ataxia: a voxel-based morphometry study. Cerebellum 2013;12:429–36 doi:10.1007/s12311-012-0424-0 pmid:23090212

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Chevis CF,
    3. da Silva CB,
    4. D'Abreu A, et al

    . Spinal cord atrophy correlates with disability in Friedreich's ataxia. Cerebellum 2013;12:43–47 doi:10.1007/s12311-012-0390-6 pmid:22562714

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Rizzo G,
    3. Tonon C,
    4. Valentino ML, et al

    . Brain diffusion-weighted imaging in Friedreich's ataxia. Mov Disord 2011;26:705–12 doi:10.1002/mds.v26.4 pmid:21370259

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Pagani E,
    3. Ginestroni A,
    4. Della Nave R, et al

    . Assessment of brain white matter bundle atrophy in patients with Friedreich ataxia. Radiology 2010;255:882–87 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091742 pmid:20501725

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Akhlaghi H,
    3. Corben L,
    4. Georgiou-Karistianis N, et al

    . Superior cerebellar peduncle atrophy in Friedreich's ataxia correlates with disease symptoms. Cerebellum 2011;10:81–87 doi:10.1007/s12311-010-0232-3 pmid:21107777

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Subramony SH,
    3. May W,
    4. Lynch D, et al

    ; Cooperative Ataxia Group. Measuring Friedreich ataxia: interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale. Neurology 2005;64:1261–62 doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000156802.15466.79 pmid:15824358

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Materka A,
    3. Strzelecki M

    . Texture analysis methods: a review. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of COST B11: Technical University of Lodz, Poland, Brussels, Belgium. June 25–28, 1988
25. 25.↵
    2. Materka A

    . MaZda User's Manual. Version 3.30Accessed August 13, 2015. Lodz University of Technology; Institute of Electronics: 1998–2000. http://www.eletel.p.lodz.pl/programy/mazda/download/mazda_manual.pdf. Accessed August 13, 2015.
26. 26.↵
    2. De Certaines JD,
    3. Larcher T,
    4. Duda D, et al

    . Application of texture analysis to muscle MRI: 1-what kind of information should be expected from texture analysis? EPJ Nonlinear Biomedical Physics 2015;3:3 doi:10.1140/epjnbp/s40366-015-0017-1

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    2. de Albuquerque M,
    3. Anjos LG,
    4. Maia Tavares de Andrade H, et al

    . MRI texture analysis reveals deep gray nuclei damage in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2015 May 25. [Epub ahead of print]
28. 28.↵
    The GLCM Tutorial Home Page. http://www.fp.ucalgary.ca/mhallbey/tutorial.htm. Accessed March 29, 2015.
29. 29.↵
    2. van der Sanden JJ,
    3. Hoekman DH

    . Review of relationships between grey-tone co-occurrence, semivariance, and autocorrelation based image texture analysis approaches. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2005;31:207–13 doi:10.5589/m05-008

    CrossRef
30. 30.↵
    2. Shannon CE

    . A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 1948;27:379–423 doi:10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-3

    CrossRefWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Moore GR,
    4. Laule C, et al

    . Pathological correlates of magnetic resonance imaging texture heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2013;74:91–99 doi:10.1002/ana.v74.1 pmid:23939554

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Friedreich N

    . Ueber Ataxie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der hereditären Formen: Nachtrag. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med 1877;70:140–52

    CrossRef