MRI Findings of Disc Degeneration are More Prevalent in Adults with Low Back Pain than in Asymptomatic Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Jarvik JG,
   3. Deyo RA

   . Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:586–97 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00010 pmid:12353946

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Deyo RA,
   3. Cherkin D,
   4. Conrad D, et al

   . Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 1991;12:141–56 doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.001041 pmid:1828670

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Li AL,
   3. Yen D

   . Effect of increased MRI and CT scan utilization on clinical decision-making in patients referred to a surgical clinic for back pain. Can J Surg 2011;54:128–32 doi:10.1503/cjs.001510 pmid:21443829

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Carragee E,
   3. Alamin T,
   4. Cheng I, et al

   . Are first-time episodes of serious LBP associated with new MRI findings? Spine J 2006;6:624–35 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.005 pmid:17088193

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Boden SD,
   3. Davis DO,
   4. Dina TS, et al

   . Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:403–08 pmid:2312537

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Kalichman L,
   3. Kim DH,
   4. Li L, et al

   . Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain. Spine J 2010;10:200–08 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.018 pmid:20006557

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Wiesel SW,
   3. Tsourmas N,
   4. Feffer HL, et al

   . A study of computer-assisted tomography, I: the incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:549–51 doi:10.1097/00007632-198409000-00003 pmid:6495024

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Fardon DF,
   3. Williams AL,
   4. Dohring EJ, et al

   . Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0—recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J 2014;14:2525–45 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.022 pmid:24768732

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Deeks JJ,
   3. Dinnes J,
   4. D'Amico R, et al

   ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:iii–x, 1–173 doi:10.3310/hta7270 pmid:14499048

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. DerSimonian R,
    3. Laird N

    . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88 doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 pmid:3802833

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Higgins JP,
    3. Thompson SG,
    4. Deeks JJ, et al

    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 pmid:12958120

    FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Boos N,
    3. Dreier D,
    4. Hilfiker E, et al

    . Tissue characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic disc herniations by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Res 1997;15:141–49 doi:10.1002/jor.1100150121 pmid:9066539

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Capel A,
    3. Medina FS,
    4. Medina D, et al

    . Magnetic resonance study of lumbar disks in female dancers. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:1208–13 doi:10.1177/0363546508330128 pmid:19417120

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Danielson B,
    3. Willén J

    . Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2601–06 doi:10.1097/00007632-200112010-00015 pmid:11725242

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Dora C,
    3. Wälchli B,
    4. Elfering A, et al

    . The significance of spinal canal dimensions in discriminating symptomatic from asymptomatic disc herniations. Eur Spine J 2002;11:575–81 doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0448-0 pmid:12522716

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Edmondston SJ,
    3. Song S,
    4. Bricknell RV, et al

    . MRI evaluation of lumbar spine flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals. Man Ther 2000;5:158–64 doi:10.1054/math.2000.0356 pmid:11034886

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Feng T,
    3. Zhao P,
    4. Liang G

    . Clinical significance on protruded nucleus pulposus: a comparative study of 44 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and 73 asymptomatic control in tridimensional computed tomography [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2000;20:347–49 pmid:11789245

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Gibson MJ,
    3. Szypryt EP,
    4. Buckley JH, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of adolescent disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:699–703 pmid:3680327

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Jensen MC,
    3. Brant-Zawadzki MN,
    4. Obuchowski N, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994;331:69–73 doi:10.1056/NEJM199407143310201 pmid:8208267

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Matsumoto M,
    3. Okada E,
    4. Toyama Y, et al

    . Tandem age-related lumbar and cervical intervertebral disc changes in asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 2013;22:708–13 doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2500-z pmid:22990606

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Al-Saeed O,
    3. Al-Jarallah K,
    4. Raeess M, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in young Arabs with low back pain. Asian Spine J 2012;6:249–56 doi:10.4184/asj.2012.6.4.249 pmid:23275808

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Bennett DL,
    3. Nassar L,
    4. DeLano MC

    . Lumbar spine MRI in the elite-level female gymnast with low back pain. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:503–09 doi:10.1007/s00256-006-0083-7 pmid:16520993

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Boos N,
    3. Rieder R,
    4. Schade V, et al

    . 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences: the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:2613–25 doi:10.1097/00007632-199512150-00002 pmid:8747239

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Takatalo J,
    3. Karppinen J,
    4. Niinimäki J, et al

    . Association of Modic changes, Schmorl's nodes, spondylolytic defects, high-intensity zone lesions, disc herniations, and radial tears with low back symptom severity among young Finnish adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1231–39 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182443855 pmid:22166927

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Boden SD,
    3. McCowin PR,
    4. Davis DO, et al

    . Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1178–84 pmid:2398088

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Greenberg JO,
    3. Schnell RG

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic adults: cooperative study—American Society of Neuroimaging. J Neuroimaging 1991;1:2–7 pmid:10148429

    PubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Healy JF,
    3. Healy BB,
    4. Wong WH, et al

    . Cervical and lumbar MRI in asymptomatic older male lifelong athletes: frequency of degenerative findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:107–12 doi:10.1097/00004728-199601000-00019 pmid:8576458

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Savage RA,
    3. Whitehouse GH,
    4. Roberts N

    . The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males. Eur Spine J 1997;6:106–14 doi:10.1007/BF01358742 pmid:9209878

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Silcox DH 3rd.,
    3. Horton WC,
    4. Silverstein AM

    . MRI of lumbar intervertebral discs: diurnal variations in signal intensities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:807–11; discussion 811–12 doi:10.1097/00007632-199504000-00013 pmid:7701395

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Weinreb JC,
    3. Wolbarsht LB,
    4. Cohen JM, et al

    . Prevalence of lumbosacral intervertebral disc abnormalities on MR images in pregnant and asymptomatic nonpregnant women. Radiology 1989;170:125–28 doi:10.1148/radiology.170.1.2521192 pmid:2521192

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Visuri T,
    3. Ulaska J,
    4. Eskelin M, et al

    . Narrowing of lumbar spinal canal predicts chronic low back pain more accurately than intervertebral disc degeneration: a magnetic resonance imaging study in young Finnish male conscripts. Mil Med 2005;170:926–30 doi:10.7205/MILMED.170.11.926 pmid:16450819

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Luetmer PH,
    4. Comstock B, et al

    . Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:811–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4173 pmid:25430861

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Karakida O,
    3. Ueda H,
    4. Ueda M, et al

    . Diurnal T2 value changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs. Clin Radiol 2003;58:389–92 doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(02)00583-4 pmid:12727168

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Kjaer P,
    3. Leboeuf-Yde C,
    4. Korsholm L, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1173–80 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000162396.97739.76 pmid:15897832

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Ranson CA,
    3. Kerslake RW,
    4. Burnett AF, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic professional fast bowlers in cricket. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1111–16 doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B8.16405 pmid:16049249

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Zobel BB,
    3. Vadalà G,
    4. Del Vescovo R, et al

    . T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging quantification of early lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in healthy young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1224–30 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b2450 pmid:22281486

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Jarvik JG,
    3. Hollingworth W,
    4. Heagerty PJ, et al

    . Three-year incidence of low back pain in an initially asymptomatic cohort: clinical and imaging risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1541–48; discussion 1549 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000167536.60002.87 pmid:15990670

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Jarvik JJ,
    3. Hollingworth W,
    4. Heagerty P, et al

    . The Longitudinal Assessment of Imaging and Disability of the Back (LAIDBack) study: baseline data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1158–66 doi:10.1097/00007632-200105150-00014 pmid:11413431

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Jensen TS,
    3. Karppinen J,
    4. Sorensen JS, et al

    . Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008;17:1407–22 doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0770-2 pmid:18787845

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Jensen RK,
    3. Leboeuf-Yde C,
    4. Wedderkopp N, et al

    . Is the development of Modic changes associated with clinical symptoms? A 14-month cohort study with MRI. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2271–79 doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2309-9 pmid:22526703

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Snyder LA,
    3. Shufflebarger H,
    4. O'Brien MF, et al

    . Spondylolysis outcomes in adolescents after direct screw repair of the pars interarticularis. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:329–33 doi:10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13772 pmid:24949906

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Fardon DF,
    3. Milette PC

    . Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:E93–E113 doi:10.1097/00007632-200103010-00006 pmid:11242399

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Kuisma M,
    3. Karppinen J,
    4. Niinimäki J J, et al

    . Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies: prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1116–22 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000261561.12944.ff pmid:17471095

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.
    2. Carragee EJ,
    3. Paragioudakis SJ,
    4. Khurana S

    . 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2987–92 doi:10.1097/00007632-200012010-00005 pmid:11145809

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.
    2. Kovacs FM,
    3. Arana E,
    4. Royuela A, et al

    . Disc degeneration and chronic low back pain: an association which becomes nonsignificant when endplate changes and disc contour are taken into account. Neuroradiology 2014;56:25–33 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1294-y pmid:24190653

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.
    2. Paajanen H,
    3. Erkintalo M,
    4. Parkkola R, et al

    . Age-dependent correlation of low-back pain and lumbar disc regeneration. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997;116:106–07 doi:10.1007/BF00434112 pmid:9006777

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.
    2. Koyama K,
    3. Nakazato K,
    4. Min S, et al

    . Radiological abnormalities and low back pain in gymnasts. Int J Sports Med 2013;34:218–22 doi:10.1055/s-0032-1316366 pmid:22972241

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.
    2. Hancock M,
    3. Maher C,
    4. Macaskill P, et al

    . MRI findings are more common in selected patients with acute low back pain than controls? Eur Spine J 2012;21:240–46 doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1955-7 pmid:21822662

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.
    2. Kaneoka K,
    3. Shimizu K,
    4. Hangai M, et al

    . Lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration in elite competitive swimmers: a case control study. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:1341–45 doi:10.1177/0363546507300259 pmid:17405885

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
50. 50.
    2. Tertti MO,
    3. Salminen JJ,
    4. Paajanen HE, et al

    . Low-back pain and disk degeneration in children: a case-control MR imaging study. Radiology 1991;180:503–07 doi:10.1148/radiology.180.2.1829844 pmid:1829844

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.
    2. Takatalo J,
    3. Karppinen J,
    4. Niinimäki J, et al

    . Does lumbar disc degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging associate with low back symptom severity in young Finnish adults? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:2180–89 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182077122 pmid:21358475

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.
    2. Paajanen H,
    3. Erkintalo M,
    4. Kuusela T, et al

    . Magnetic resonance study of disc degeneration in young low-back pain patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:982–85. pmid:2528827

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science