Prediction of Infarction and Reperfusion in Stroke by Flow- and Volume-Weighted Collateral Signal in MR Angiography

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Miteff F,
   3. Levi CR,
   4. Bateman GA, et al

   . The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2009;132:2231–38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Christoforidis GA,
   3. Mohammad Y,
   4. Kehagias D, et al

   . Angiographic assessment of pial collaterals as a prognostic indicator following intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1789–97

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Bang OY,
   3. Saver JL,
   4. Buck BH, et al

   . Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:625–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Bang OY,
   3. Saver JL,
   4. Kim SJ, et al

   . Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:693–99

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Fiehler J,
   3. Remmele C,
   4. Kucinski T, et al

   . Reperfusion after severe local perfusion deficit precedes hemorrhagic transformation: an MRI study in acute stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;19:117–24

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Kim JJ,
   3. Fischbein NJ,
   4. Lu Y, et al

   . Regional angiographic grading system for collateral flow: correlation with cerebral infarction in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2004;35:1340–44

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Ishimaru H,
   3. Ochi M,
   4. Morikawa M, et al

   . Accuracy of pre- and postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke: correlation with catheter angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:923–26

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Maas MB,
   3. Lev MH,
   4. Ay H, et al

   . Collateral vessels on CT angiography predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009;40:3001–05

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Souza LC,
   3. Yoo AJ,
   4. Chaudhry ZA, et al

   . Malignant CTA collateral profile is highly specific for large admission DWI infarct core and poor outcome in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1331–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Yang JJ,
    3. Hill MD,
    4. Morrish WF, et al

    . Comparison of pre- and postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography for the evaluation of distal intracranial branch occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:557–67

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Alfke K,
    3. Jensen U,
    4. Pool C, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in stroke diagnostics: additional information compared with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography? Clin Neuroradiol 2011;21:5–10

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Schellinger PD,
    3. Jansen O,
    4. Fiebach JB, et al

    . Feasibility and practicality of MR imaging of stroke in the management of hyperacute cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1184–89

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. McVerry F,
    3. Liebeskind DS,
    4. Muir KW

    . Systematic review of methods for assessing leptomeningeal collateral flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:576–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Bash S,
    3. Villablanca JP,
    4. Jahan R, et al

    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1012–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Broderick JP,
    3. Palesch YY,
    4. Demchuk AM, et al

    . Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Forkert ND,
    3. Cheng B,
    4. Kemmling A, et al

    . ANTONIA perfusion and stroke: a software tool for the multi-purpose analysis of MR perfusion-weighted datasets and quantitative ischemic stroke assessment. Methods Inf Med 2014;53:469–81

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Forkert ND,
    3. Fiehler J,
    4. Suniaga S, et al

    . A statistical cerebroarterial atlas derived from 700 MRA datasets. Methods Inf Med 2013;52:467–74

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Davis SM,
    3. Donnan GA,
    4. Parsons MW, et al

    . Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:299–309

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Albers GW,
    3. Thijs VN,
    4. Wechsler L, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006;60:508–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Wheeler HM,
    3. Mlynash M,
    4. Inoue M, et al

    . Early diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion-weighted imaging lesion volumes forecast final infarct size in DEFUSE 2. Stroke 2013;44:681–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Christensen S,
    4. Levi CR, et al

    . Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43:2648–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Olivot JM,
    3. Mlynash M,
    4. Thijs VN, et al

    . Optimal Tmax threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute stroke. Stroke 2009;40:469–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Chaudhry ZA,
    4. Nogueira RG, et al

    . Infarct volume is a pivotal biomarker after intra-arterial stroke therapy. Stroke 2012;43:1323–30

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Lansberg MG,
    3. Straka M,
    4. Kemp S, et al

    . MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. König IR,
    3. Ziegler A,
    4. Bluhmki E, et al

    . Predicting long-term outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a simple index works in patients from controlled clinical trials. Stroke 2008;39:1821–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Barak ER,
    4. Copen WA, et al

    . Combining acute diffusion-weighted imaging and mean transmit time lesion volumes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score improves the prediction of acute stroke outcome. Stroke 2010;41:1728–35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Jung S,
    3. Gilgen M,
    4. Slotboom J, et al

    . Factors that determine penumbral tissue loss in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2013;136:3554–60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Jauch EC,
    3. Saver JL,
    4. Adams HP Jr., et al

    . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:870–947

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Kucinski T,
    3. Koch C,
    4. Eckert B, et al

    . Collateral circulation is an independent radiological predictor of outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2003;45:11–18

    PubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Liebeskind DS,
    3. Tomsick T,
    4. Foster LD, et al

    . Collaterals at angiography and outcomes in the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial. Stroke 2014;45:645–51

    FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Bivard A,
    3. Spratt N,
    4. Levi C, et al

    . Perfusion computer tomography: imaging and clinical validation in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2011;134:3408–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Tan IY,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. Hopyan J, et al

    . CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:525–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Heverhagen JT,
    3. Bourekas E,
    4. Sammet S, et al

    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 7 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008;43:568–73

    CrossRefPubMed