Impact of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Machida H,
   3. Takeuchi H,
   4. Tanaka I, et al

   . Improved delineation of arteries in the posterior fossa of the brain by model-based iterative reconstruction in volume-rendered 3D CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:971–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Yasaka K,
   3. Katsura M,
   4. Akahane M, et al

   . Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Springerplus 2013;2:209

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Shuman WP,
   3. Green DE,
   4. Busey JM, et al

   . Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:1071–76

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Thibault JB,
   3. Sauer KD,
   4. Bouman CA, et al

   . A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 2007;34:4526–44

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Volders D,
   3. Bols A,
   4. Haspeslagh M, et al

   . Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Radiology 2013;269:469–74

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Miéville FA,
   3. Berteloot L,
   4. Grandjean A, et al

   . Model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric chest CT: assessment of image quality in a prospective study of children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:558–67

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Kanal KM,
   3. Stewart BK,
   4. Kolokythas O, et al

   . Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:219–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Gunn ML,
   3. Kanal KM,
   4. Kolokythas O, et al

   . Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:987–90

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Bodelle B,
   3. Bauer RW,
   4. Holthaus L, et al

   . Dose and image quality of high-pitch dual source computed tomography for the evaluation of cervical lymph node status: comparison to regular 128-slice single source computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e281–285

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Kalra MK,
    3. Maher MM,
    4. Toth TL, et al

    . Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Wiest PW,
    3. Locken JA,
    4. Heintz PH, et al

    . CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2002;23:402–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Imhof H,
    3. Schibany N,
    4. Ba-Ssalamah A, et al

    . Spiral CT and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 2003;47:29–37

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Linton OW,
    3. Mettler FA Jr.

    . National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:321–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Brenner D,
    3. Elliston C,
    4. Hall E, et al

    . Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Sodickson A,
    3. Baeyens PF,
    4. Andriole KP, et al

    . Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009;251:175–84

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Katsura M,
    3. Matsuda I,
    4. Akahane M, et al

    . Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1613–23

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Greess H,
    3. Wolf H,
    4. Baum U, et al

    . Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions. Eur Radiol 2000;10:391–94

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Mulkens TH,
    3. Bellinck P,
    4. Baeyaert M, et al

    . Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 2005;237:213–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. McCollough CH,
    3. Primak AN,
    4. Braun N, et al

    . Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47:27–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Hara AK,
    3. Paden RG,
    4. Silva AC, et al

    . Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR J Roentgenol 2009;193:764–71

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    2. Vachha B,
    3. Brodoefel H,
    4. Wilcox C, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR). Eur J Radiol 2013;82:2222–26

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Nuyts J,
    3. De Man B,
    4. Dupont P, et al

    . Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol 1998;43:729–37

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Geleijns J,
    3. Salvado Artells M,
    4. Veldkamp WJ, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2334–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Hamberg LM,
    3. Rhea JT,
    4. Hunter GJ, et al

    . Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 2003;226:762–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Fleischmann D,
    3. Boas FE

    . Computed tomography: old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 2011;21:510–17

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Silva AC,
    3. Lawder HJ,
    4. Hara A, et al

    . Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR J Roentgenol 2010;194:191–99

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    2. Yu Z,
    3. Thibault JB,
    4. Bouman CA,
    5. Sauer KD, et al

    . Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process 2011;20:161–75

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Gramer BM,
    3. Muenzel D,
    4. Leber V, et al

    . Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2654–61

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Kilic K,
    3. Erbas G,
    4. Guryildirim M, et al

    . Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1578–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Niu Y,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Liu Y, et al

    . Radiation dose to the lens using different temporal bone CT scanning protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:226–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Singh S,
    3. Kalra MK,
    4. Hsieh J, et al

    . Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010;257:373–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science