Small Pipes: Preliminary Experience with 3-mm or Smaller Pipeline Flow-Diverting Stents for Aneurysm Repair prior to Regulatory Approval

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Pistocchi S,
   3. Blanc R,
   4. Bartolini B, et al

   . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   Health Canada. Summary of basis of decision: Pipeline embolization device. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/sbd-smd/md-im/sbd_smd_2010_pipeline_embolization_148227-eng.php. Accessed March 24, 2014.
3. 3.↵
   US Food and Drug Administration. Pipeline embolization device approval letter. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/p100018a.pdf. Accessed March 24, 2014.
4. 4.↵
   2. Yavuz K,
   3. Geyik S,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:529–35

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Fiorella D,
   3. Woo HH,
   4. Albuquerque FC, et al

   . Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008:62:1115–20; discussion 1120–21

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Kulcsár Z,
   3. Wetzel SG,
   4. Augsburger L, et al

   . Effect of flow diversion treatment on very small ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2010;67:789–93

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Deutschmann HA,
   3. Wehrschuetz M,
   4. Augustin M, et al

   . Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: results from a single center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:481–86

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. McAuliffe W,
   3. Wenderoth JD

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:487–93

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Murad MH,
   4. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Arrese I,
    3. Sarabia R,
    4. Pintado R, et al

    . Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2013;73:193–99; discussion 199–200

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Saatci I,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Ozer C, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Liou TM,
    3. Li YC

    . Effects of stent porosity on hemodynamics in a sidewall aneurysm model. J Biomech 2008;41:1174–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Martin AR,
    3. Cruz JP,
    4. Matouk CC, et al

    . The Pipeline flow-diverting stent for exclusion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with difficult morphologies. Neurosurgery 2012;70(1 suppl operative):21–28; discussion 28

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. O'Kelly C,
    4. Kelly M, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:271–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Dai D,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Kadirvel R, et al

    . Patency of branches after coverage with multiple telescoping flow-diverter devices: an in vivo study in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:171–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text